Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> - ALv2 is not compatible with GPLv2 due to the patent terms, making that >> situation a bit weird. BSD would make that simpler, but I'm not sure it >> actually matters. AFAIK, that "not compatible" means, that ALv2 code cannot be used

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-02 Thread Benson Margulies
Brett, OK, I follow. I wanted to just add the two cents that, since this is a tool and not a library, the complex licensing is very unlikely to cause anyone any practical problems. Ironically, your analysis of the history of the thing indicates that the cobertura team cannot really grant the lice

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-02 Thread Benson Margulies
Brett, Larry On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote: 's > > On 02/04/2011, at 7:08 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> Brett will have to write for himself. From my point of view, either a >> proper Codehaus / Apache notice (one that claims copyright for >> Codehaus and then grants the licen

[mojo-dev] [jira] Closed: (MOJO-1450) Sonar mojo: remove the scope "provided" of all Maven dependencies

2011-04-02 Thread Simon Brandhof (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Brandhof closed MOJO-1450. Resolution: Won't Fix > Sonar mojo: remove the scope "provided" of all Maven dependencies > --