Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0

2013-07-04 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > 2013/7/1 sebb > > > On 1 July 2013 03:56, Barrie Treloar wrote: > > > On 1 July 2013 06:52, sebb wrote: > > >> Another problem: the NOTICE file contains the following spurious text: > > >> > > >> > > > =

Re: [VOTE] All new (non-patch) releases of Maven Core after 30th Sep 2013 to require Java 6+

2013-07-23 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 nb On Jul 23, 2013 4:00 PM, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: > This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core. > > Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as > compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their baseline will still > require to

Eclipse Aether is not filtered out from Plugin Class Realm

2013-09-11 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi, it seems in 3.1.x, since Aether was swapped from Sonatype one to Eclipse one, the filtering was not updated, and Eclipse Aether is getting into plugin Class Realms... See https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/892b464683645bcdc1d28febf0bf3cc1c3181350/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/De

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon version 2.5

2013-09-12 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10335&version=19092 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WAGON%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC Staging repo: h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon version 2.5

2013-09-17 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Vote closed. Results: +3 binding (Olivier, Robert and Hervé). Will continue with release. Thanks, ~t~ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > tested with Maven core and ITs > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 12 septembre 2013 13:29:32 Tamás

[ANN] Apache Maven Wagon 2.5 Released

2013-09-17 Thread Tamás Cservenák
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Wagon, version 2.5 Maven Wagon is a transport abstraction that is used in Maven's artifact and repository handling code. Site http://maven.apache.org/wagon/ To make use of it, you may override the Wagon version with ext

Re: Webdav wagon 2.5

2013-09-17 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi Arnaud, I could not reproduce this, but instead DAV Wagon threw CNFEx... (but it did kick in). Actually, this is in line with maven 3.0.4, as it behaves the same. In both cases commons logging LogFactory class was missing, but I have no clue from where it should come, as from wagon-webdav POM

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-26 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 tried on Nexus builds (with modded nx plugin in build, that updates Aether to Eclipse one). On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Wayne Fay wrote: > +1 binding > Finally gave it a shot last night after your reminder email, works > well on various projects I tested it with. > > Wayne > > On Wed, S

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-05 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+10 for markdown and getting rid of old formats. Markdown is really easy, and as Jason says, tooling for editing it is really superb. Thanks, ~t~ (mobile) On Oct 5, 2013 5:19 PM, "Jason van Zyl" wrote: > We current have multiple formats for our site documentation and two of > them no one else in

Maven Indexer plans

2013-11-07 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi there, I am toying with some thoughts to make a bigger leap with MI. I plan to start 6.0 of it, with following changes: Changes would be along these lines: - Collapse indexer-artifact into indexer-core (this modularization had a historical reason, coming from Sonatype Nexus) - Remove Maven1 su

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Verifier version 1.5

2013-12-04 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 downloaded the staged release zip, checksum matches, is buildable to me. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 5 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=11761&version=19029 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIR

Re: New logo?

2013-12-17 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Don't want to stir too much here, but the http://oi41.tinypic.com/33bctw2.jpg is typographically incorrect (odd kerning and odd/different typeface). Long time ago I made vector based Maven logo (for Proximity site) that I thought I donated to Maven project... That one could serve as a great start

Re: New logo?

2013-12-17 Thread Tamás Cservenák
down the interwebs from apache using Tamás's > > text > > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven.png > > > > > > > > > > And a screenshot with it > > > > > > > > > > > http:/

Re: Plugin phase awareness...

2013-12-23 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Here is an example, same as proposed by Igor https://github.com/sonatype/nexus-maven-plugins/blob/master/staging/maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/sonatype/nexus/maven/staging/AbstractStagingMojo.java#L72 Still, you need to be careful if you want maven 2.x, maven 3.0.x and maven 3.1.x compatibility,

Re: Any impediment to a wagon release?

2013-12-29 Thread Tamás Cservenák
I did the last 2.5 one, that had two major problems: 2G file limit and httpclient 4.x pool pollution problem As I see, there are 3 issues solved http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WAGON%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.6%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20ORDER%20BY%20priority

Re: Cleaning out @deprecated methods in MavenSession

2014-01-05 Thread Tamás Cservenák
As i mentioned in referenced thread, i would really like to see maven at java7. We talk about release to happen in near future, that would be used in a bit further future by users, but even _today_ there is no other java than 7 that is not eol-d. For those locked in, there are still 3.0, 3.1 relea

Re: Cleaning out @deprecated methods in MavenSession

2014-01-05 Thread Tamás Cservenák
I missed jvz's question: yes for removal of deprecations eagerly. If anything, we should start doing that eagerly (4 years?), and declare this step as transitioning one toward 4.0? thanks, ~t~ (mobile) On Jan 5, 2014 11:29 AM, "Tamás Cservenák" wrote: > As i mentioned in re

Re: Further cleanup of Builders (extension of MNG-5575)

2014-02-06 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Jason, a bit off topic, but you mention that "if last reactorProject" type logic breaks badly in parallel mode. Any pointers how to fix/replace it? Thanks, ~t~ On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > I made a first pass at coalescing the logic for a specific way to b

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.0

2014-02-11 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > +1 > > --- > > Analyzer... > > stagingUrl: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1005 > groupId: org.apache.maven > artifactId: apache-maven > version: 3.2.0 > > Source ZIP url exists. > > https://repository.apache.or

Re: Linkage error

2014-02-13 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Maybe related to https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5513 ? As cdi-api is now also in core? Thanks, ~t~ On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Kristian Rosenvold < kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Stuart, > > We're seeing java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: loader > (instanc

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life

2014-02-13 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Anders Hammar wrote: > +1 > > /Anders > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August > 2009. > > > > During that period no release

Re: maven-plugin with own lifecylce - not workign with maven-install / maven-deploy plugin deployAtEnd / installAtEnd

2014-02-28 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Install at end of m-install-p has problems related to aggregator POMs for example, here is an example plugin that will NOT install anything than the aggregator POM (attached). If you have such set up, it will fail. Simply put, the m-install-p install mojo blindly expects it will get invoked for _e

Re: maven-plugin with own lifecylce - not workign with maven-install / maven-deploy plugin deployAtEnd / installAtEnd

2014-02-28 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Yeah, I just wanted to show one example. The point is that install mojo is not invoked for all projects in the build, as expected, and will never kick in to install the accumulated projects: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/blob/8678f791e717c14f6b91b80fade0a376ac87625a/src/main/java/org/ap

Re: Mixins as an aspect-oriented DRY tool

2014-04-01 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Re MNG issue links... they are in codehaus Jira. Just prepend the " http://jira.codehaus.org/browse"; to them. Like http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5102 On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Alexander Kriegisch < alexan...@kriegisch.name> wrote: > Thanks Anders, > > so part of my question is ans

Re: maven-project artifact version

2014-04-01 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, module "maven-project" was removed as part of Maven3 changes/refactoring (but as you noted, was still present in some early alphas). Just compare the two diagrams, and you will see that "project" module is gone: http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/ http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.2.1/ It's mo

Re: Maven Indexer code to git?

2014-04-15 Thread Tamás Cservenák
go for it On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > > Someone with a strong opposition to move maven-indexer code to git? > If no one complains within 72H, I will ask migration to infra. > > Cheers, > -- > Olivier Lamy > Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au > http://twitter.com/ola

Re: Create a dedicated ML for commits related to websites updates

2014-04-29 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there someone against the idea to create a dedicated ML to receive > commit notifications for website updates ? > I'm tired to receive this SPAM that are filling my inbox each time we > release a project and it's not

Re: Anyone else having issues reaching https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+4.0.0 ?

2014-05-23 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Seems fine to me (true, I have no karma to edit, but logged in and pageload is quite fast). Thanks, ~t~ On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > For the last few days the instance seems to be in distress. Anyone else > having issues? > > Thanks, > > Jason > > --

Re: Apachecon in budapest ?

2014-06-11 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 thanks, ~t~ (mobile) On Jun 11, 2014 7:54 AM, "Kristian Rosenvold" wrote: > I've been considering attending apachecon in Budapest, and I would be > really interested in creating a meet up to discuss "future maven" (for > one or more days). It would be interesting to see if we'd be capable > o

Re: Evolving the POM format

2014-06-19 Thread Tamás Cservenák
I could not make it for hangout, and got a message by google that hangout was canceled? Where is a link of the recording, if any? Thanks, ~t~ On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > We had the hangout yesterday. I pushed the initial bit of information > about evolving the POM

Re: Evolving the POM format

2014-06-19 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Ah, both localhost and recording problem solved. The proper link is http://takari.io/2014/06/19/hangout-pom-format.html On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > I could not make it for hangout, and got a message by google that hangout > was canceled? > > Where

Topics for "Maven Development Hangout"

2014-06-19 Thread Tamás Cservenák
I did not make it for the first one, but watched the recording. One topic I'd like to propose is about thing mentioned at very last minutes of the recording: repository tags in POM, "smarter protocol" between Maven and MRM, etc Should we have some wiki with topic proposals maybe? Thanks, ~t

Re: Q: Thread Safety - Parallel Builds

2014-06-20 Thread Tamás Cservenák
In Plexus, you can make the plexus component "prototype" (as opposite of current singleton) by adding instantiationStrategy="per-lookup" in that case, Plexus container will create new instance of the component for every injection/lookup. On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise w

Maven Indexer is Java7

2014-06-28 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi there, finally got to sort out some changes, among other is Lucene bump. Due to that change, MI6 (heh) on master is now Java7... I'd like to ask someone with enough power to update the Jenkins job. Currently it consistently fails as it uses Java6. https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-indexer/

Re: Maven Indexer is Java7

2014-06-28 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Thanks Robert! Thanks, ~t~ On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Done, > > Robert > > Op Sat, 28 Jun 2014 17:32:45 +0200 schreef Tamás Cservenák < > ta...@cservenak.net>: > > > Hi there, >> >> finally got to sort out some change

RE: Maven Developer Hangout

2014-07-05 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Yes. But repo IDs are meaningless imo, urls are a bit better (as Igor mentioned, could be used as uris, sorta). Nx even today stores all the urls a cached artifact was downloaded in its own attributes (you can check it with ?describe request). The only problem currently is that if you access repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M1

2018-11-02 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 (binding) works OK on system/openjdk that initially made me report SUREFIRE-1588 in the first place. On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12342871 > > There are st

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M1 - TAKE 2

2018-11-05 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Sun, Nov 4, 2018, 11:48 Tibor Digana Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12342871 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+stat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.2.1

2018-11-10 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, 23:50 Olivier Lamy My +1 > > @Tibor https://markmail.org/message/u465ivo46osuskhi > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 at 02:48, Tibor Digana wrote: > > > +1 > > I do not see the previous history in this vote. > > > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 2:34 PM Robert Scholte > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Retired Maven Artifact Resolution API (Maven2)

2019-05-08 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 T

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Runtime library

2019-05-15 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Wed, May 15, 2019, 22:33 Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Maven project consist of about 100 (sub)projects. Due to the > small number of volunteers and the huge amount of code to maintain we're > missing enough space to make real progress on all these projects, including > our am

Re: proposal for maven-archetype to switch to dom4j 2.1.1 (and Java 8)

2019-06-04 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Just wondering: what stops you developing on more modern java, and targeting older java? Or in other words, why is using target java a must on development? Just curious. Ps: sry for jumping the thread On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, 16:48 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > I know there are plenty of places at

Re: proposal for maven-archetype to switch to dom4j 2.1.1 (and Java 8)

2019-06-04 Thread Tamás Cservenák
te: > Java 8 uses a different major version number in the .class file than > Java 7. Generally a Java 8 .class file can't be loaded into a Java 7 > VM. In this case, I think dom4j would have to compile for Java 7 for > the dom4j.jar to load into Java 7. > > On Tue, Jun 4

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MNG-6691) Maven protocol specification

2019-07-06 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Just fyi, am aware of 3+2 oss solutions out there (the +2 are the trimmed ones) On Sat, Jul 6, 2019, 00:26 dzikoysk (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16879546#comment-168

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Repository Builder

2019-08-07 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 21:13 Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Maven project consist of about 90 (sub)projects. Due to the > small number of volunteers and the huge amount of code to maintain we're > missing enough space to make real progress on all these projects, > including our ambi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Resolver version 1.4.1

2019-08-15 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 1 issue: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12345950 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+MRE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Archetype version 3.1.2

2019-08-22 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 22:50 Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 9 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317122&version=12345957 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ARCH

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven OSGi

2019-08-23 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:17 PM Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Maven project consist of about 90 (sub)projects. Due to the > small number of volunteers and the huge amount of code to maintain we're > missing enough space to make real progress on all these projects, > including our

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.2

2019-08-30 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:18 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > > We have solved 52 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12345234 > > There are issues left in JIRA for Maven core: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20

Fwd: maven download broken on all mirrors

2019-09-03 Thread Tamás Cservenák
FYI, And just to confirm, HU mirror lost 3.6.1 as well. T -- Forwarded message - From: 'Jörg Hohwiller' via mojohaus-dev Date: Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:13 PM Subject: maven download broken on all mirrors To: mojohaus-dev Hi there, may be wrong here but I unsubsribed from maven-d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Invoker Plugin version 3.2.1

2019-09-12 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Mon, Sep 9, 2019, 04:01 Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi > I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker Plugin version 3.2.1. > We solved 6 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12344863&styleName=Text&projectId=12317525&Create=Create > > Staged repository: > https

Re: [VOTE] Maven incremental build for BIG-sized projects with local and remote caching

2019-09-13 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi there, just a shot in a dark: Have you tried any of the existing stuff, like Takari Lifecycle before modding Maven itself? ( http://takari.io/book/40-lifecycle.html) Thanks, T On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46 PM Maximilian Novikov < maximilian.novi...@db.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > > > *We want t

Re: Dynamic phases proposal

2019-10-25 Thread Tamás Cservenák
The fixed phases were one of the main strengths of Maven, and with this automatism it could really be enhanced. My dislike: the `before:goal` invocation is being "projected" to non existent plugin invocation. This sounds like a hack. Could we clear that part up? T On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:23 P

Re: Dynamic phases proposal

2019-10-25 Thread Tamás Cservenák
lugin". On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:13 PM Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri 25 Oct 2019 at 21:41, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > > The fixed phases were one of the main strengths of Maven, and with this > > automatism it could really be

Re: [VOTE] JDK 8 Minimum Requirement for Maven 3.7.0

2019-10-29 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 21:11 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi to all, > > based on the discusion this is the formal VOTE to lift the minimum of > Maven Core with version 3.7.0 to JDK 8 minimum. > > Vote open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Mar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.6.3

2019-11-21 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 9:06 PM Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > This will be a regression release based on some critical issues discovered > in Maven 3.6.2 > > We solved 10 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12346152&styleName=Text >

Re: Maven GroupID authority

2020-02-15 Thread Tamás Cservenák
There are traces of it in resolver provider: https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/716cc1fe02661897232a7cc3e4c1bb3b3df3b832/maven-resolver-provider/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/internal/DefaultArtifactDescriptorReader.java#L316 And AFAIK, it _does_ obeys it... T On Sat, Feb 15, 2020

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.9.2

2020-02-22 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 08:13 Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 5 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12345961&styleName=Text > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1552/ > > https://repositor

Re: Maven Minify - Add already minified during merge

2020-04-29 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi Bakary, this is the wrong list for question like these: this list is about core Maven development, and it's core plugins, which minify maven plugin certainly is not. Look around and ask here for help: https://samaxes.github.io/minify-maven-plugin/ HTH, T On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:54 PM Bakar

Re: Plexus Logging API

2020-05-31 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 to rip out plexus logging On Sun, May 31, 2020, 17:58 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Moved from slack per suggestion: > > The documentation on logging for Maven seems of two minds: > > "Maven uses [Plexus logging API][6] with basic Maven implementation > writing to stdout. > We have reached t

Re: Artifact installation and versions

2020-07-07 Thread Tamás Cservenák
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-4059 maybe? On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:58 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Thank you. That's exactly what I needed to know. The behavior did > indeed change from 3.0 to 3.1 so I should not be surprised that my PR > that updates the dependency plugin to 3.

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

2020-11-19 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi Bjorn and Emmanuel, Without starting any flame wars, am really curious: why are you repackaging Maven? I'd understand for OS/distro native packages, but why do you rebuild JVM bytecode as well? Again, am not to start any flame war, am just curious! Am Linux user since 98 (first worked on S.u

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

2020-11-20 Thread Tamás Cservenák
is "dance" once, but from now on, all this work can be scraped, right? Thanks Tamas On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:49 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 19/11/2020 09:51, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > > Without starting any flame wars, am really curious: why are you > > repacka

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

2020-11-20 Thread Tamás Cservenák
no need to redo all this for EVERY maven version, right? T On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:06 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Thanks for the answers! > > AFAIK, we in Apache as well "vote for source", while we provide binaries > as well. > > Given the video mentions that Maven

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

2020-11-20 Thread Tamás Cservenák
the same, if not deeper dependency hierarchy as with deb/rpm or whatever other package system has as well. (Another joke) By the way, what do you do with npm packages? ;) Thanks Tamas T On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:13 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Maybe it was not clear from my last statement: so

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.4.2

2020-11-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2020-11-25 um 21:47 schrieb Michael Osipov: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 3 issues: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12348348 > > > > > > There are still a couple of issues left in JI

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Allow attributes shorthand in pom.xml

2020-12-12 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Agree with Robert here: this issue is really about "hard to author/write POMs as they are chatty". Then use polyglot, and let's Maven itself (or Maven + polyglot) sort out things, but modding POM modello is something not we'd like to do... (as many others noted, existing tooling etc). My 5 cents.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Transfer version 0.13.1

2020-12-25 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Fri, Dec 25, 2020, 22:20 Michael Osipov wrote: > I need one more binding vote... > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >

Re: Maven deploy logic .. that does upload of pom, jar, sha1, md5 ?

2021-01-09 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, well, it's not so simple, is buried under layer and layers of abstraction... you did start on good place, but it is actually something like m-deploy-p -> m-artifact-transfer -> maven-resolver -> maven-resolver-connector (usually wagon) -> HTTP wagon So if you are literally after code "whe

Re: Maven deploy logic .. that does upload of pom, jar, sha1, md5 ?

2021-01-10 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Simplest is to clone (in gh) these reposes to your user https://github.com/apache/maven https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon Then clone them from there to your machine (git clone). I usually add "upstream" remote (git remote add upstream ...) that points

Re: JSR330 in extensions and plugins, Singleton or not Singleton

2021-02-05 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Just add few cents to Stuart superb answer: the singleton scope depends on the "realm" (no idea how to call it better) where it is singleton, as the "lifespan" of realm may not be same/aligned. Core and Core Extension lifespan vs Mojo/Plugin lifespan is clearly not the same... Also, take a peek at

Re: JSR330 in extensions and plugins, Singleton or not Singleton

2021-02-05 Thread Tamás Cservenák
When I read "jsr330" (in maven context), I always "replace it" with SISU in my head, as Maven is SISU powered. So there is nothing undefined for me, as SISU defines all the "blind spots" IMO. Maven, while it may look so, will NOT work with any other JSR330 implementation, just SISU. Maven 3 was ma

Re: [DISCUSS] MNG-7020 Remove Maven 2 WagonExcluder backward compat code

2021-02-06 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 fot option 3: we drag so much of legacy, that m4 really should accept maven 3.1+ plugins only (covers 14 years?). T On Sat, Feb 6, 2021, 14:32 Robert Scholte wrote: > (I'm not sure if this has already been discussed on the dev-list, but I > can't find any related thread) > > Plugins that dep

Re: maven-site-plugin and sisu-inject-plexus

2021-02-09 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, my 5 cents: Something is stale, very stale in there, as plexus-container-default was abandoned about 10 (maybe 12?) years ago, and sisu "shim" (sisu-inject-plexus) was created as the direct replacement (as functional and as API). If your project has Plexus "the old container" (plexus-cont

Re: maven-site-plugin and sisu-inject-plexus

2021-02-09 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Sorry, but I have to clarify this "Plexus et al is one of the reasons..." misleading statement: It is not Plexus per se THE reason, but the "neglected and stale" dependencies, or better "dependencies like these"... T On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:38 PM Tamás Cservenák w

Plugin dependency resolution

2021-02-10 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, Some time ago I stumbled upon Robert S. remark in "[DISCUSS] MNG-7020 Remove Maven 2 WagonExcluder backward compat code" thread: "Why download, if they are being removed from the classpath afterwards due to classworld config". Similarly, there is a thread "maven-site-plugin and sisu-inject-

Re: Plugin dependency resolution

2021-02-10 Thread Tamás Cservenák
plexus-container-default count is SAME as with Maven build, so it is most probably some "common" plugin(s) pulling it in... Again, around 1.1k unnecessary downloads prevented, which surprises me... So, to me the "gain" looks constant so maybe not really worth the effort? T

Re: Plugin dependency resolution

2021-02-10 Thread Tamás Cservenák
3.6.3? > > AFAIK there's no ticket for it yet, these were just the ideas I could > think of regarding the WagonExcluder issue. > Looks like it is time to create it. > > thanks, > Robert > > On 10-2-2021 09:50:24, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Howdy, > > Some time

Re: Plugin dependency resolution

2021-02-11 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7097 On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:41 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I agree with you: is a really small change. > Re non-exported packages: will take a look into those a bit more, my POC > was just at "artifact

Re: Plugin dependency resolution

2021-02-11 Thread Tamás Cservenák
ice, > which > will take longer time... > need to test also... > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 11 février 2021, 08:41:21 CET Tamás Cservenák a écrit : > > Hi Robert, > > > > I agree with you: is a really small change. > > Re non-exported packa

Re: Plugin dependency resolution

2021-02-11 Thread Tamás Cservenák
<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://ww

Re: Parent pom or BOM not resolved using DefaultProjectBuildingRequest

2021-02-13 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, take a peek at resolver "demo" snippets here: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/blob/master/maven-resolver-demos/maven-resolver-demo-snippets/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/resolver/examples/ResolveTransitiveDependencies.java Word of warning: do not "mix" ServiceLocator and DI (Guic

Re: Releasing Wagon

2021-02-18 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 go for it On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 2:48 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hello, > there are issues on GitHub Actions that could be mitigated/fixed with a new > release of Wagon Wheel. > > There is only this fix, about upgrading Http Client dependencies > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WAGO

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.4.3

2021-02-19 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:32 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 3 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12349719 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Invoker Plugin version 3.2.2

2021-02-20 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Sat, Feb 20, 2021, 10:33 Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote: > Kindly reminder, need one more pmc votes > > niedz., 14 lut 2021, 01:40 użytkownik Sylwester Lachiewicz < > slachiew...@apache.org> napisał: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 17 issues: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Relea

Maven Assembly Plugin resolves extensions of dependencies -- is this intentional?

2021-03-11 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, just a quick question, I thought someone may enlighten me... Noticed, that Maven _resolves_ and _creates extension realms_ for things I did not opt to at all. Typical example is nexus-staging-maven-plugin, that maven 3.6.3 resolves at one moment in my build, despite not using it. So, what

Re: Maven Assembly Plugin resolves extensions of dependencies -- is this intentional?

2021-03-11 Thread Tamás Cservenák
t some > of the artifacts being downloaded when invoking certain plugins. Thanks for > looking into this and trying to improve the situation. > > - Eric L > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:19 PM Tamás Cservenák > wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > just a quick question,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.2

2021-03-16 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 23:53 Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=1235 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MRESOLVER/issues?filt

Re: maven-site-plugin and sisu-inject-plexus

2021-04-17 Thread Tamás Cservenák
l without trying to extend it to a general purpose > framework. YAGNI. > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:39 PM Tamás Cservenák > wrote: > > > > Howdy, > > > > my 5 cents: > > > > Something is stale, very stale in there, as plexus-container-default was > > aban

Re: maven-site-plugin and sisu-inject-plexus

2021-04-17 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Plexus-container-default is NOT (and SHOULD NOT) be used anywhere, but the > drop in sisu-plexus drop replacement should be used instead. > > If we use p-c-d anywhere (even in UTs), that's bad, as maven uses s-p > instead. > > p-c-d is not use

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Project Info Reports Plugin version 3.1.2

2021-04-26 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Sun, Apr 25, 2021, 21:46 Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 3 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317821&version=12349521 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MPIR/issues > > Staging

plexus-sec-dispatcher

2021-05-04 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, plexus-sec-dispatcher is a really widely used dependency, is used in maven itself, but also in many shared components and plugins (nb: there are even some org.sonatype.plexus:plexus-sec-dispatcher among shared deps!). Given this module is really maven specific, I see no reason to keep it "

Re: plexus-sec-dispatcher

2021-05-04 Thread Tamás Cservenák
> > > would makes sense with changing groupId/artifactId and packages > > but cons: release this if needed will take ages because of ASF procedures > > So, understood re ID/package But forgot about the ASF process... but it would be weird if I want to "de-plexus" plexus-sec-dispatcher in codehaus-

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.3

2021-05-05 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 6:31 PM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > build successfully reproduced: reference is JDK 8 on Windows > > Le mardi 4 mai 2021, 15:32:08 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > we solved 4 issues: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.7.0

2021-05-09 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 Tamás On Sat, May 8, 2021, 11:36 Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > we solved 23 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12349416 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.1.0

2021-05-12 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Sun, May 9, 2021, 20:15 Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 5 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322&version=12349726&styleName=Text > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1647/ > > https://repository

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver Ant Tasks version 1.3.1

2021-05-13 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Thu, May 13, 2021, 20:18 Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2021-05-13 um 20:17 schrieb Michael Osipov: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 2 issues: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12350159 > > > > > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: @Parameter on a NIO Path

2021-05-29 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, Something is wrong here... You want to _extend_ sisu-plexus-shim, codebase that is here to buy out (functionally) old Plexus Containers? The one meant to be a drop-in replacement for legacy Plexus containers? Given we have STILL mixed use of sisu-plexus-shim and "original" plexus-container,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Dependency Plugin version 3.2.0

2021-06-07 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 14:29 Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 9 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12348705&styleName=Html&projectId=12317227 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MDEP/issu

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.7.1

2021-06-14 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:45 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12350167 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >