: resource copy selection. Basically here what it would be
an interesting workflow:
1) git clone a branch on a repo in ${repo}
2) copy folder F or ${repo} in target/classes (copying the whole repo will
make the scripting JSR - aka JSR223 - not found the scripts in general)
wdyt?
*Romain Manni-Bucau
looks close yes, didn't know it, then playing with some file operation can
work
thanks
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.c
Awesome! Thanks again, still need to go a bit deeper but it works:
https://github.com/rmannibucau/landslide-maven-plugin/blob/master/pom.xml
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.word
scm plugin is what i was looking for, exec plugin was not portable enough
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu
Hi
Got the exact same issue with another plugin.
Le 18 juil. 2013 06:43, "Brett Porter" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've got a regression here using the Swagger Maven Plugin [1] that looks
> different to the Aether one. Before I go poking around further, I was
> wondering if anyone can tell me if it's a
I don't have it anymore on my computer (i was testing several plugins and i
removed a lot of them) but looking at the code it was using
ClassRealmConverter too. Hacking the plugin to remove this usage made it
working in my case.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog:
When i tested on tomee gain was ridiculous too so maybe not the first place
to hack on to make maven fast ;)
Le 9 août 2013 18:36, "Jason van Zyl" a écrit :
> And what's the net difference then before after trying to parallelize the
> classloading? I'll read up on the Java7 classloading this week
d" a
écrit :
> 2013/8/9 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > When i tested on tomee gain was ridiculous too so maybe not the first
> place
> > to hack on to make maven fast ;)
>
>
> > Le 9 août 2013 18:36, "Jason van Zyl" a écrit :
> >> And what's
much more important) dynamic dependencies
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
Isnt the question: is there still someone needing j5? Almost all apache
projects and others moved to j6 at least
Le 11 nov. 2013 23:53, "John Patrick" a écrit :
> i guess it's the only way to definitely ensure backwards compatibility
>
> open potential solution would be to use vagrant, I use it t
Hello
Not sure the question was about test classes - you got answers for that ;)
- or maven and plugins themselves. If the last one, just replace "mvn" by
"mvnDebug" in any command and remote debug on port 8000 in your IDE.
Side note: if you check mvn script you will see maven has a main class so
ll so
it just fails and breaks a lot of mojo. One lib using that feature is jaxb
>= 2.3.0 so any mojo relying on jaxb 2.3 is broken.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpre
ader which is not the case for standard simple
tasks mojos.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <ht
Hi Lewis
You can debug using mvnDebug but i think it is cause there is already a
property handler -
https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-model-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/model/profile/activation/PropertyProfileActivator.java
- so depending the scanning order you take one o
@Andreas: no, the bug is in plexus as explained before, jaxb is provided
but plexus classloader is not java11 compatible
@Hervé: i'll try to send a PR on plexus soon, will probably be faster than
mail exchanges ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
FYI https://github.com/sonatype/plexus-classworlds/pull/16
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <
6, J. Lewis Muir a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 3:31 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > You can debug using mvnDebug but i think it is cause there is already a
> > property handler -
> >
> https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-model-builder/src
Le ven. 16 nov. 2018 20:36, J. Lewis Muir a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > For the marker i was thinking about "property" so your activation would
> be
> > "el:name" or anything else - idea just being n
Le sam. 17 nov. 2018 00:10, J. Lewis Muir a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 3:35 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > I didnt find in the code where the hint matches, just saw a chain so
> should
> > work if i didnt miss a later filtering.
>
> Where in the code is tha
Le sam. 17 nov. 2018 17:06, J. Lewis Muir a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 1:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > > > Not instead but also. Instead of 3 impl you will get 4.
> > >
> > > I see. I guess I don't know where to hook into the model,
Time to push your code and an example on github to encourage help/people to
run it ;)
Le lun. 19 nov. 2018 22:28, J. Lewis Muir a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:32 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > Le sam. 17 nov. 2018 17:06, J. Lewis Muir a écrit
> :
> > &
ktpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 à 05:56, J. Lewis Muir a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:16 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > Time to push your code and an example on github to encourage help/people
> to
> >
Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 19:23, J. Lewis Muir a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 2:30 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > 1. you have to use lib/ext folder and not extensions.xml cause it is
> loaded
> > too late
>
> Unfortunately, that's a deal breaker. Using M
Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 22:24, J. Lewis Muir a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:01 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 19:23, J. Lewis Muir a écrit
> :
> > > There's no way I can get the developers of the
> > > software I'm plann
+1 (non binding)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in
Hey guys,
any way we move that topic forward beginning of next year?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
retty much useless (it is
just about making implicit these dependencies) and it makes the whole build
parallelizable and not just modules which will often find some bottleneck
modules in projects building a distribution.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
Mojos already have the ability to say if they are threadsafe, what do you
see missing?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm
depending on SCM changes, feel free to bring it to our
> mailing list. The same with tests where the set of tests is changed
> depending on SCM changes.
>
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 2:21 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
&
Any hope https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6543 is included?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
g cause it asks the question of phases which would be
less useful in that context.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://githu
écrit :
> phases are about the user calling out how far they want to go, not about
> sequencing... at least once we get a propper execution graph
>
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 13:54, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Currently maven can't but I expect a way to do it, eithe
Hi,
Im not quite sure of what had been said but please take into account that:
1. Slack is not only for committers
2. Slack is now administrated by our infra
3. Slack is for asf - IMO better to not split the communities accross
various IM solutions
So not binding but I'd prefer maven to stay on
mentioned to
> > > propagate Gitter.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 12:07 PM Olivier Lamy
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > agree with what Romain said.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 24 Mar 2019 at 21:06, Romain Manni-Bucau
with asf slack but most of the active contributors
> are not committers so we switched to gitter.im
We also have the opposite, projects using their own IM and moving over
slack to be with the ASF instead of in their own unmaintained solution.
>
>
> Enrico
>
> Il dom 24 mar 2019, 1
+1 (non-binding)
Le lun. 29 avr. 2019 à 06:11, Francois Papon
a écrit :
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks!
>
> regards,
>
> François Papon
> fpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 27/04/2019 à 20:03, Enrico Olivelli a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 1 issue:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNo
Not really Tibor I think, for two reasons:
1. If it is true then the end of your sentence is "and dont use maven but
use gradle". Both IDE have pro and cons, depends who and for what,
2. Vscode uses eclipse as backend of a LSP so as a mvn dev you care of
eclipse whatever you think of the UI since
Hi
Did you have a look to org.apache.maven.settings.crypto.SettingsDecrypter?
It can be injected as a component then you can call decrypt on it passing a
request to the method. You get a new null server if it is not encrypted or
the new server with everything in clear.
Would that work better for
yptionRequest(credentials)))
.map(SettingsDecryptionResult::getServer) // can be null if it does not
need decryption
.orElse(credentials);
}
}
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rma
files - and
fail if two are already merged.
Wdyt?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-322
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &
elman/gradle/plugins/shadow/transformers/Transformer.groovy#L26
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn
Hello Lennart,
Do you have an example where transformer abstraction can be messing for
existing transformers?
Goal here is not to abstract the build system but the user extensions for
two particular plugins.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
t) should be the adapter artifact/project, and
> his speed of development and release matters how fast he reacts on changes
> from both.
>
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:13 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Lennart,
> >
> > Do y
A PoC being always better than a mail, here is the demo of what I am
talking about: https://github.com/rmannibucau/portable-transformer
Both integrations have an IT with should help to see how it works if the
readme is not enough
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
+1
Le dim. 28 juil. 2019 à 23:14, Graham Leggett a écrit :
> On 28 Jul 2019, at 22:16, Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
>
> +1.
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> —
>
>
Hi Peter
Did you run this command to launch them:
mvn verify -Prun-its
?
It is based on the invoker plugin:
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin/. At the end of the
page there is a link about the verify script and the contextual variables
available to check, post build, the
Hi everyone,
I'd like to make https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/24 passing
on our CI to ensure it is the issue we see on master, however I don't
manage to create a job, I pushed a branch with the jira name on asf repo
but nothing pops up on jenkins.
What do I miss?
Ro
Thanks Robert.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in
Hello Paul,
Did you check maven extensions? You can rewrite the pom programmatically -
and respect maven rules whatever initial state is in the pom - without
patching maven core implementing a AbstractMavenLifecycleParticipant.
See
https://maven.apache.org/ref/3.5.0/apidocs/org/apache/maven/Abst
+1 (non binding)
Le jeu. 22 août 2019 à 20:18, Tibor Digana a
écrit :
> Thx Tamas and Olivier but I will keep the Vote open because we are still
> only 3.
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 4:39 PM Tamás Cservenák
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 22:50 Tibor Digana wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
Hi Martin,
Here it is fully unrelated but more a setup issue, see previous Tibor's
answer.
@Tibor: topic was changed do your mailbox didnt see the trick but thread is
available at
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201908.mbox/browser
Le ven. 23 août 2019 à 00:45, Tibor Digana
+1 (non binding)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in
My 2cts would be that maybe we are mixing things (all points "IMHO" but
trying to make them short):
1. Changelog: jira+github driven, must be exhaustive about changes and stay
forever with a permalink on the website
2. Release notes: some highlights from the changelog, likely user impacts
mainly a
+1 (non binding)
Le dim. 1 sept. 2019 à 12:50, Michael Osipov a écrit :
> Am 2019-08-28 um 21:17 schrieb Enrico Olivelli:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have solved 52 issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12345234
> >
> > There are issues left in JI
Agree, +1 for a single list (see last paragraph for a note on this)
@Tibor: we dont really have a contibutor section in the pom :p. Joke apart,
it cant be used at all here because it ignores the time slice the report
requires and does not scale well in time. Jira and git are reliable and
easily sc
There are multiple possible incremental support:
1. Scm related: do a status and rebuild downstream reactor
2. Full and module build graph: seems it is the one you target, ie bypass
modules without change. Note that it only works if upstream graph is taken
into account.
3. Full build: each mojo ha
o go.
Now if a guice bean in core can help to write your extension, it can surely
be reviewed more easily IMHO.
Hope it helps.
> Thanks in advance, Aleks
>
> On 2019/09/13 21:37:15, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > There are multiple possible incremental support:
> >
> >
care of responsibilities of CI
> (project cache mgmt), that's not our task I would say and we as Maven would
> never know all about the miscellaneous CI specifics and therefore we would
> not cope with CI related troubles.
>
> Cheers
> Tibor17
>
>
>
> On Sat,
w entrypoint.
> >>
> >> But I do not hink that Maven has to take care of responsibilities of CI
> >> (project cache mgmt), that's not our task I would say and we as Maven
> >> would
> >> never know all about the miscellaneous CI specifics and theref
ry" within a project.
>
Well, for you I trust you, but not as a generic core maven feature so if it
stays like that it can't exit extension state IMHO.
> -Original Message-
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 20
t clear).
> -----Original Message-
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2019 7:42 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven incremental build for BIG-sized projects with
> local and remote caching
>
> Ho
opic.
> Thank you
>
> On 2019/09/14 08:48:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Le sam. 14 sept. 2019 à 08:00, Alexander Ashitkin <
> ashitkin.a...@gmail.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > Indeed we have a kind of the option 2 with variations. Current
> &g
-overlapping-tasks-td5922723.html
- https://github.com/sudhanwadindorkar/incremental-maven-builder (which is
likely incomplete too but has some overall good idea around a potential
extension impl)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.met
> no go for this change
It is likely the easiest way to interpret (and reduce the short term
investment) it but I don't read it this way, more as "it needs more
investment to work and be a core feature usable by everyone so let step the
inclusion with intermediate deliveries" (but it is still a "g
le since we already have JarOutputStream impl at
apache which can host it IMHO.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau&g
y jib uses epoch+1s to enforce reproducibility.
that said once you have the timestamp the code is the same so let's not
block on that, worse case we would enable to plug a value resolver with a
few default strategy.
this is not the central part of the feature IMHO.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rma
While default stays not reproducible (keep in mind we enrich with dated
timestamp or build user metadata in jar quite commonly and i dont think we
want to sed/drop it) and reproducible mode gets an explicit flag in plugins
it sounds very promishing to me, in particular for containers case.
Le dim.
+1 for java 8
Java 7 dev will likely stick to already published versions since the
ecosystem is already EOL anyway so no reason to not make maven java 8 based
IMHO
Le lun. 30 sept. 2019 à 22:16, Mickael Istria a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 5:37 PM Mickael Istria wrote:
>
> > I believe thi
Le jeu. 3 oct. 2019 à 20:22, Tibor Digana a écrit :
> The topic related to TLS is only related to runtime, means JDK, which is
> under the control of the particular user or CI.
> I guess the user can easily find the answer:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50824789/why-am-i-getting-receive
worry at
all of that.
Not proactive but supporting works for backports.
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:08 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Le jeu. 3 oct. 2019 à 20:22, Tibor Digana a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > The topic related to TLS is only related to runt
Hi Marco,
I have 2 thoughts reading your post:
1. Should be enforced by an extension (sonatype plugin if target is
central?)
2. It likely misses a few phases compared to maven release plugin which
validates the release can be done (including tests) and runs the tests on
the tag as well
Now if 20
kip tests for the release
but it is at your own risk, can be fine or not - and "skip the deploy" -
here again you can configure maven to do it if you need but maven must
respect the build attached artifact.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
n. A lot of things ar imaginable.
>
> In future more lifecycles or workflows could be possible. For example a
> deploy
> lifecycle and so on. And then maven transform from a plugin execution
> framework
> to a process management framework, like Jason van Zyl described in his book
&g
weekend to all
> > . marco
> >
> > Sent from Outlook Mobile<https://aka.ms/blhgte>
> >
> >
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2019 2:06:27 AM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Cc: users
Small reminder: if you want to be reproducible you must fix the timestamp
so whatever zone, whatever format works. It is common to use new Date(1000)
in utc but not important at the end.
Side note: same applies for most of the env though (locale for ex.).
Le dim. 6 oct. 2019 à 22:57, Tibor Digana
Anything user facing preventing to let it be a final?
Anyway +1 to let fixes get out.
Le jeu. 10 oct. 2019 à 02:53, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Hi,
> It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed.
> Maybe time for a new release?
> Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5?
>
> cheers
Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 so can be
upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release IMHOj13
and j14 are still not adopted too so all good.
Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana a
écrit :
> We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on
ance our asm integration layer later.
Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:42, Tibor Digana a
écrit :
> all bad, see the stackoverflow. It happens that the users argue that they
> have to update our dependencies which is our responsibility!
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Romain Ma
ob/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/junit5-snapshots/
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:10 PM Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> > Here is the pull request
> > https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-languages/pull/29
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Romain
, 2019 at 12:44 PM Romain Manni-Bucau >
> wrote:
>
> > They work on it with some rate limiting until it gets resolved.
> > They had some abnormal load.
> >
> > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 12:24, Tibor Digana a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Romain, I have en
Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte a
écrit :
> As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that requires
> ASM.
> It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need to
> read the module descriptors.
>
> Maven Shade is a different case: it must parse the
ged because of the bytecode
> compatibility. We always had to upgrade plexus-java in the past; otherwise
> the users reported a bug directly or in the Stackoverflow.
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:45 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte
:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 13:44:48 +0200, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that
> >> requires
> >> ASM.
> >
Guess it just comes from guice or friends and since they dont support
recent API it was not upgraded.
We can upgrade it or just isolate it IMO - but requires some careness since
custom components can use it so needs an evolution to toggle it probably.
Le lun. 14 oct. 2019 à 03:43, Tibor Digana a
t the best of both worlds, no?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.c
these API.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Bo
+1
Le sam. 19 oct. 2019 à 20:31, Karl Heinz Marbaise a
écrit :
> Hi Hervé,
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
> On 19.10.19 19:40, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 6 issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=
Hi Stephen,
I like the priority a lot and shortcut syntax - not having -
sounds a good compromise on user side (inline is always appreciated) and
impl side (no model change).
Romain
Le ven. 25 oct. 2019 à 21:02, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> https://cwiki.apac
nyway) and
we can even just delegate the scanning to the underlying engine in a lot of
cases.
The gain is to drop code in surefire but also expose something more user
friendly (aligned on the used engine).
Any rational I'm missing to still have an abstraction there?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rma
g any convention
by default - since we only speak about defaults here.
I have no blocker or urgent need but that is something we should put on the
4.x (5.x?) list since we should clearly simplify testing integrations IMHO.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
+1, the risk is more or less 0 since we can still use branches for
potential fixes for "old" projects using frozen java and maven versions
anyway
Guess we can even be very precautionous doing 1. an upgrade to bytecode
version without any code change (to change the major version in bytecode),
2. a
@Tibor: the design comes from a time functional programming was not
mainstream and quite cumbersome with java, let's embrace current way of
doing and move forward otherwise we can go to attic ;).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
major
> > > version
> > > > >> would
> > > > >> > affect the JREs that Maven can run on. Basically following a one
> > > and one
> > > > >> > back for Oracle supported JDKs, thus 3.7.0 per that policy woul
issue with current toolchain you mean?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:11 AM Stephen Connolly <>
> > >> > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
+1 (non binding)
Le mar. 29 oct. 2019 à 21:12, Karl Heinz Marbaise a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> On 29.10.19 21:11, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > based on the discusion this is the formal VOTE to lift the minimum of
> > Maven Core
Hi Karl
Not sure id do a MavenIT annotation - test is enough probably - but i like
jupiter style.
Im less exited by assertj but it is probably a habit thing.
Wonder if you evaluated to run in a fake filesystem like jimfs or so and
enable the pom+files to be defined on the test method? Goal would
Le mar. 29 oct. 2019 à 22:24, Tibor Digana a
écrit :
> Karl, I am not happy with this short text because you did not say that we
> will turn the code to J8.
> There is a plugin automating this transformation.
> One man can do it in his private and that's it.
> Of course somebody has to execute pe
Le mar. 29 oct. 2019 à 22:58, Karl Heinz Marbaise a
écrit :
> Hi Romain,
>
> On 29.10.19 22:40, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi Karl
> >
> > Not sure id do a MavenIT annotation - test is enough probably - but i
> > like jupiter style.
>
> MavenIT[1] an
Hi Tibor,
It has two issues:
1. It will not be the right plugin versions in 90% of the cases (except
demo ;))
2. It will miss all custom plugins
Now question is: what happens if you mount your local repo when running
docker? It works as expected. Means we could use a custom entrypoint
printing a
cache anything.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
1 - 100 of 1061 matches
Mail list logo
