Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?

2013-06-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I think it's time to step back a little. This whole vote was started without any proper initial discussion, so to the extent there will be any majority for a policy change, this will not be the vote where this happens. But these votes tend to be great kickstarters for good discussions, so instead o

Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?

2013-06-03 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
If you add apache staging to your corp proxy and expose that to everyone you are mixing test and production. /me dislikes the concept. The way I usually solve this is to have an additional corp repo-url that exposes the regular internal repo *and* staging. This url is used to test staging. (I hav

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.15

2013-06-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Kristian 2013/6/7 Andreas Gudian : > Hi, > > This is my first release, so please check carefully what I may have missed > :). > > We solved 16 issues: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=19174 > > This is the first release that does not support JVM vers

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.15

2013-06-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
2 years ago, a bump to 1.5 might have been worth a 3.0. Now it's hardly worth a yawn. That's my 0.02 NOK. I've been cooking on a "3.0" scope including: - Finalization of provider API's including several minor changes. - Adding extension points and the possibility to pick these up from test-classp

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin 2.9.1 (take 2)

2013-06-24 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Sources at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-066/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/2.9.1/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.9.1-sources.jar, based on r1496317 Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns

Re: Maven 3.1.0-beta-1

2013-06-26 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Funny in a sort of ironic way, permgen is noticeably better in 3.1 for my usecases :) The simplest way to get (my) attention to this issue is to create 2 heap dumps of your maven process, one after "some time" and the other just before it runs out of permgen. ("some time" is supposed to be well i

Re: Maven 3.1.0-beta-1

2013-06-26 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Oops. It appears the standard heap dump toosl don't really dump permgen, so that's not going to get us anywhere. I usually do this in jprofiler, maybe someone else has a suggestion :) Kristian 2013/6/26 Kristian Rosenvold : > Funny in a sort of ironic way, permgen is noticeably

Re: Release process updates

2013-06-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
This suggestion is much like what we came up with the last time we discussed this - about 3 weeks ago. This behaviour is simple to achieve without a single line of change; the release plugin already asks for a SCM tag name distinct from the version number. (we *could* add some kind of support for

Re: Release process updates

2013-06-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
IK in URLs. > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragment_identifier > Regards Mirko > -- > http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ > https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Kristian Rosenvold >

Re: Release process updates

2013-06-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
ages which has >>> no special semantics AFAIK in URLs. >>> >>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragment_identifier >>> Regards Mirko >>> -- >>> http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ >>> https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ &g

Re: Java version usage survey

2013-07-16 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I tucked away the last public debs of 1.5 and can release 1.5 indefinitely. In the release of the last security patch, it seems like Oracle have released approx 10 nonpublic jdk 5 versions. Shame we can't have it. Kristian Den 16. juli 2013 14:14 skrev "Lennart Jörelid" følgende: > I rum mainl

Re: Java version usage survey

2013-07-16 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Look you chickens; until quite recently I kept a 1.3 JVM running on windows to do the occasional test of surefire on jdk 1.3. (I kept a vmware image since installing 1.3 on linux required surrendering your first born to Sauron) All your complaining about not being able to run 1.5 sounds like c

Re: Java version usage survey

2013-07-16 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
16. juli 2013 kl. 07:35 skrev Stephen Connolly : > - have we good test coverage with toolchains? No. Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache

Re: [VOTE] All new (non-patch) releases of Maven Core after 30th Sep 2013 to require Java 6+

2013-07-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2013/7/23 Stephen Connolly : > This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core. > > Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as > compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their baseline will still > require to stick to the minimum Java

Re: [2/2] git commit: o change the scope of org.eclipse.sisu to test in the maven-aether-provider to prevent it from leaking out to clients.

2013-07-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
It's ok if not pushed, but I think it should be made a lot clearer in the guide. We could install commit hooks into the repo that enforce specific patterns on commits, like [\d].* *or* starts with an "o ". But then again the "o " seems to be under attack too :) Kristian 2013/7/27 Hervé BOUTEMY

Re: [2/2] git commit: o change the scope of org.eclipse.sisu to test in the maven-aether-provider to prevent it from leaking out to clients.

2013-07-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Is there a problem you're trying to fix or have you just been taking too many vitamin pills ? Kristian 2013/7/27 Fred Cooke : > :-) Tui, yeah right. [1][2] > > Or work on branches, pushed publicly with meaningful names like > attempt-fix-of-site-behaviour or whatever and seek peer review before

Latest modello breaks maven core unit test

2013-08-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Hervé/Simone: The latest version of modello breaks a unit test in m3 core, DefaultModelValidatorTest#testEmptyModule. I've tracked the problem down to commit 1284d155417209d2e1a063606a2c692f89e32152 in modello, and I was wondering if any of you could take a look at it ? I would like to push mode

Re: Latest modello breaks maven core unit test

2013-08-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
e Treloar > : > > >> On 5 August 2013 17:54, Kristian Rosenvold >> wrote: >>> >>> the next core release; I did some pretty significant >>> performance improvements to maven core that I'd like to have in the >>> n

Re: Latest modello breaks maven core unit test

2013-08-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
s DirectoryScanner (not relevant for core, but good for plugins. p-u version 3.0.13); will implement in m-s-u soon. Kristian 2013/8/5 Barrie Treloar : > On 5 August 2013 17:54, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: >> the next core release; I did some pretty significant >> performance im

Re: Latest modello breaks maven core unit test

2013-08-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
5 August 2013 21:15, Barrie Treloar wrote: >> On 5 August 2013 20:55, Kristian Rosenvold >> wrote: >>> "no" :) >>> >>> I used m3 core as a case for trying out some new & interesting >>> strategies for using a profiler, which I'll

Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I just committed an update to plexus-classworlds that permits concurrent classloading under jdk7. I would really appreciate it if anyone would care to review this patch, especially regarding thread safety (esp the use of guards to access the protected methods of the base classes, which is where th

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
mance improvements in core we'd have to go for higher-level optimizations, which are harder to find ;) Kristian 2013/8/8 Jason van Zyl : > What the performance difference in loading classes in your stand-alone tests? > > On Aug 8, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: > >>

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
for running 12km off-piste in the woods; the tempo is generally sufficiently low to let the crazy ideas creep in... Kristian 2013/8/8 Kristian Rosenvold : > Not much :) In the test builds I'm measuring (entire builds, not just > core), class loading is 2-4% of > the build

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
filer skew" for these methods - hence the execution time for these methods might be closer to *real* time...?) Kristian 2013/8/8 Kristian Rosenvold : > Not much :) In the test builds I'm measuring (entire builds, not just > core), class loading is 2-4% of > the build CPU time (

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I just did some manual instrumentation to classworlds since I'm not trusting the profiler due to native code. For my 2 test projects, classloading is pretty close to 10% of the total build time (with -DskipTests). As I suspected yesterday, this confirms that at least YJP reports classloading time

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
surefire and maven core itself. I run with -DskipTests since I dont want to measure "that" right now :) Kristian 2013/8/9 Stuart McCulloch : > On 9 Aug 2013, at 17:21, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > >> I just did some manual instrumentation to classworlds since I'm not &

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
2013/8/9 Romain Manni-Bucau : > When i tested on tomee gain was ridiculous too so maybe not the first place > to hack on to make maven fast ;) > Le 9 août 2013 18:36, "Jason van Zyl" a écrit : >> And what's the net difference then before after trying to parallelize the >> classloading? I'll read

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
parallized (didnt find a free solution to > this one) > 3) you need to load independent classes > > So generally gain is not as impressive as parallelization sounds > Le 9 août 2013 19:52, "Kristian Rosenvold" a > écrit : > >> 2013/8/9 Romain Manni-Bucau : >&

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
2013/8/9 Andreas Gudian : > But now you need a JDK 7 to build that project, right? I didn't see that in > the pom. Is it defined somewhere else? That's because you're not looking at the latest commit I did :) Kristian - To unsub

Re: Parallel classloading, need review...

2013-08-10 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Just did the quick POC (without red wine!!) at https://github.com/krosenvold/plexus-classworlds/commit/f1059c904788eb96e22a9a6a1ead6b3febe57948 By recording the classloading and re-running in reverse order in a (single) separate thread on subsequent reloads, it would appear I almost cut the class

Re: [perf] Maven classloading performance improvements: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-467

2013-08-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
zOMG; what an interesting piece of code ! If you want to take a shot at improving this you can make a patch and a pull request. I can guarantee a quick & efficient review of such a patch. Kristian 2013/8/13 Martin Kočí : > Hi, > > I read the whole interesting discussion about maven parallel clas

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.16

2013-08-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 3 days pass so quickly Kristian 2013/8/14 Andreas Gudian : > Anyone? > > If I can't collect the results today, I won't be able to do it for another > week or so. > > Am Sonntag, 11. August 2013 schrieb Andreas Gudian : > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 13 issues: >> >> https://jira.codehaus.org/secu

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin 1.5

2013-08-15 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 (Yeah, the vote) Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Use modello 1.8.1, not 1.8

2013-08-15 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
There was a compatibility break with generated code for maven 2.2.1. Fixed in 1.8.1 Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Maven Core ITs and releasable state

2013-08-20 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The jobs you suggested are a minimum (and "OK"). I really think we should have a functioning windows build too... (I suspect we even have 1 or 2 committers that actually use windows now!) I have no idea of what is actually wrong with the windows build. I have a Mac Mini running windows functioning

Re: Maven Core ITs and releasable state

2013-08-21 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Maybe you can knit something for my mac mini flowerpot stand, the one that runs windows ? Kristian 2013/8/21 Jason van Zyl : > I agree that it would be nice to have Windows and OSX builds. But looking at > our grid and that those builds are either disabled or haven't passed in > months I don'

IT failure on Maven-doap plugin with maven >3.0.3

2013-08-29 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I see on Jenkins, that the IT's on the DOAP plugin fail once we pass maven 3.0.3. I extracted the following from the build.log file. Anyone know what issue this is, and what workaround/fix might be applied ? Kristian -- GroupId: org.apache.maven.its.doap ArtifactId:

Re: IT failure on Maven-doap plugin with maven >3.0.3

2013-08-31 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Great stuff. I looked around a bit and there does not seem to be a workaround (like a System property that can be set)... Kristian 2013/8/31, Robert Scholte : > Nice :D > > Case closed > > Op Sat, 31 Aug 2013 23:39:31 +0200 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY > : > >> yeah, I just tested m-doap-p ITs with *MN

Why is wagon shaded in core ?

2013-09-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I understand that the deps of wagon need to be shaded, but why does the actual wagon code itself need to be shaded ? Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ma

Wagon & PRoxy auth ??

2013-09-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
While looking at the access denied problem for wagon, I ran into this code line: https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/blob/master/wagon-providers/wagon-http/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/wagon/providers/http/AbstractHttpClientWagon.java#L740 The call uses a deprecated version of "authenticated"

Re: Why is wagon shaded in core ?

2013-09-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
e? > > On 2 September 2013 18:28, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: >> I understand that the deps of wagon need to be shaded, but why does >> the actual wagon code itself need to be shaded ? >> >> Kristian >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-10 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Den 8. sep. 2013 15:08 skrev "Jason van Zyl" følgende: > Hi, > > Here is a link to Jira with 6 issues resolved: > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18968 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-016/ > > The distribu

Parallel build scheduling explanation

2013-09-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Jason sent me some questions about the parallel build that included a real nice figure. Since I'm a sucker for nice figures (especially those that others make!), I quickly updated the wiki page with this, and added some docs to describe his figure. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN

Re: Parallel build scheduling explanation

2013-09-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
gt; I suppose each circle is a module > but I don't understand what the levels are, and how modules are dispatched > into levels > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 19 septembre 2013 18:36:49 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit : >> Jason sent me some questions about the pa

Re: Parallel build scheduling explanation

2013-09-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
can be built simultaneously without any side-effects. > > On Sep 19, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > >> I suppose each circle is a module >> but I don't understand what the levels are, and how modules are dispatched >> into levels >> >> Re

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-25 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Den 25. sep. 2013 17:23 skrev "Jason van Zyl" følgende: > Anyone else going to give the release a whirl? > > On Sep 17, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Maven Core ITs are good, and the license/notice issue has been resolved > so I'm rolling 3.1.1 again. > > > > Here i

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

2013-09-26 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Did you/can you check the contents of the bad jars ? Kristian 2013/9/26 jieryn : > Greetings, > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> Does 3.1.0 not display this behaviour? >> >> On Sep 25, 2013, at 6:41 PM, jieryn wrote: >>> Archive for required library: >>> '$HOME/.m2/re

Welcome Tibor Digana as a Maven Committer !

2013-09-26 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Somewhat delayed I'd like to welcome Tibor Digana as our latest committer! Tibor has been doing extensive work on improving the parallel running capabilities of surefire, and I look forward to seeing more good stuff from him ! Welcome ! Kristian -

To shell or not ?

2013-09-26 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXUTILS-161 had to come up; and we need a little collective digging down memory lane. (Tha same issue is present in m-s-u) Do we rely on shell expansion capabilities in our code ? Can we switch to Runtime.exec safely ? The mind boggles Kristian -

Re: To shell or not ?

2013-09-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
u have > to explicitly define which of these variables you want to use in the shell. > For the maven-release-plugin I'd like to keep its current behavior, and I > guess you want that for the surefire project as well. > > Robert > > Op Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:02:56 +0200 schreef K

Re: Maven Core moving to 1.6

2013-10-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 (i think 3.2 is the obvious v) 5. okt. 2013 13:23 skrev "Anders Hammar" følgende: > +1 for 3.2 (or greater) > -1 for 3.1.x > > /Anders > > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: St

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
If we were to deprecate one or more documentation formats, wouldn't it make sense to make a plugin to automate the conversion ? After all, there's a few thousand sites out there that might want such a modernization ? Kristian 2013/10/5 Tamás Cservenák : > +10 for markdown and getting rid of old

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
2013/10/6 Stephen Connolly : >> IMHO >> >> Betamax == AsciiDoc >> VHS == MarkDown Being a bunch of old geezers, we all know which was technically superior. I had to teach my oldest kid how to operate a non-mobile phone the other day (she dialled number before lifting the handset) Kristian -

Re: Surefire Providers and the tests are classes assumption

2013-10-20 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The interface org.apache.maven.surefire.providerapi.SurefireProvider generally leaves it ut to the provider to determine what kind of object describes a test. Up until fairly recently, most of the providers used arbitrary strings, which *could* map 1:1 to a class, or could be something totally diff

Re: Surefire Providers and the tests are classes assumption

2013-10-21 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
have been part of > the "let people run tests from .jar files also" effort (which is a big +1 > from my PoV) though I do not see why this needs to leak the assumption that > tests are contained in .class files. > > > On 21 October 2013 07:26, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Finding this kind of leaks with my graciously provided OSS license of YJP is like stealing candy from children export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xms512m -Xmx2084m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -agentpath:C:/java/yjp-12.0.6/bin/win64/yjpagent.dll=onexit=snapshot" c:/java/apache-maven-3.1.1/bin/mvn $@ Run test with forkM

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9

2013-10-28 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
> Also having failing tests for one platform isn't very likely to > attract new developers from that platform. Turning it into a > never-ending downward spiral. > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: >> Finding this kind of leaks with my grac

Re: Fixed: Unable to upload release artifacts to Apache's nexus

2013-11-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I agree totally that the focus of the output on error is just so /wrong/. Do we know if anyone actually depends on the order/format of these things ? Kristian 2013/11/1 Martijn Dashorst : > My biggest gripes with Maven in this situation are two fold: > > 1. an error message that can be much more

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I just added a .gitattributes file to the repo, which fixes the problem permanently. All our git repos now have that file. Come to think of it, maybe we should do another round of migrations ? Kristian 23. nov. 2013 07:23 skrev "Hervé BOUTEMY" følgende: > uh! > > with svn, we have svn-eol-s

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Your local settings dont matter now that I added .gitattributes K

Re: Model Version 5.0.0

2013-11-24 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
IMO publishing to central/acrhiva would involve publishing the "richest" format available. Based on use-agent identification (or lack of a given request param indicating old-style client) the repository should be able to down-transform a v5 pom to a v4 pom "on the fly" ? We're not going to be losin

Re: New logo?

2013-12-17 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I'm speechless. Kristian 2013/12/17 Stephen Connolly > the anteater sucking down the interwebs from apache using Tamás's text > > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven.png > > And a screenshot with it > > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/screenshot.p

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven JXR version 2.4

2013-12-17 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 10. des. 2013 22:41 skrev "Michael-O" <1983-01...@gmx.net> følgende: > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > version=17492&styleName=Html&projectId=11085 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavi

Re: New logo?

2013-12-18 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
think the picture of an AntEater can feed into the "which is > > >>> better: > > >>> > ant > > >>> > > vs maven?" debate. I would opt not to possibly offend the Ant > team. > > >>> > > > > >&

Re: New logo?

2013-12-18 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
What's the 75px requirement ? Is it an apache requirement that the logo must be sinfully ugly ? Kristian 2013/12/18 Stephen Connolly > More emphasis on the glasses... > > https://twitter.com/connolly_s/status/413346357487730688/photo/1 > > > On 18 December 2013 16:28, Stephen Connolly < > ste

Java 8 update status

2013-12-18 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I just created https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+8+Upgrade to track the status of java 8 migration "problems". This includes the bug number for the bugs.sun.com bug report I just filed yesterday that makes verifier break. Kristian

Re: Java 8 update status

2013-12-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
n in jira. jMNG-5551 is good for keeping tabs on what's actually known :) Kristian 2013/12/19 Kristian Rosenvold > I just created > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+8+Upgrade to track > the status of java 8 migration "problems". This includes the bug n

Re: Java 8 update status

2013-12-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
.2 to minimize diff up to 5.0. Do you know anything about the differences between asm 4.2 and 5.0 are significant in terms of api breakage ? Kristian 2013/12/19 Stuart McCulloch > On 19 Dec 2013, at 08:08, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: > > > I figured we could use the wiki page to eve

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I think all the crap/trolling in the release threads has gone way too far, it's just not fun any more. I can only request that PMC members chip in *before* the the vote to /improve/ technical problems with a release rather than spending a ton of energy documenting their -1 *after* the release is s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2013-12-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
#x27;t always get it right. Kristian 2013/12/20 Stephen Connolly > On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > > > I think all the crap/trolling in the release threads has gone way too > far, > > it's just not fun any more. > > > > I can only

Heads up on forthcoming releases:

2013-12-22 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Shortly after the 2014/01/23 JDK8 final release candidate is made available I will release: Maven Dependency Plugin Maven Shade Plugin maven-depency-analyzer (maven shared) All of them will be released with asm4.2, opposed to the current 3.X asm. It should be possibly to drop in asm 5.x for jdk 8

Re: JDK 8 Build 121 & JDK 7 Update 60 build 02 are available on java.net

2013-12-31 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Been meaning to answer this mail for a few days, but I've been far too busy skiing in the norwegian mountains :) We have some fairly extensive tests and integration tests that would, to a large extent, also function as a verification of jdk8 compatibility. Unfortunately most of them get stuck at s

Re: New logo?

2014-01-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Am I reading this correctly if it's aboput $130 for a full logo contest including the rights for use ? If we can formulate some decent requirement specification, coughing up the money should be the least of our problems. Does the feather have to stay in its original shape/form? Is the logo requir

Re: JDK 8 Build 121 & JDK 7 Update 60 build 02 are available on java.net

2014-01-03 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
//bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030781> gets released into a nightly. Kristian 2014/1/3 Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland > Hi Kristian, > > I am following sun bug 9009028, > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030781 > > Rgds,Rory > > &

Re: Cleaning out @deprecated methods in MavenSession

2014-01-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I think we should remove any deprecations that do not break trunk of maven-plugins and mojo-trunk, and call it 3.2; at least do this as an initial move. Then we can determine the scope of /use/ of deprecations. I am very skeptical to removing stuff wholesale "just because" we deprecated it 4 years

Re: Cleaning out @deprecated methods in MavenSession

2014-01-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
's removed and it breaks code then that code needs to change IMO. > If they are plugins those plugins can update their code along with prereq. > The authors can push out a final version for the 3.x line and then move > forward with working with 4.0. > > On Jan 5, 2014, at 10:41 A

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)

2014-01-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
If you're in europe you should probably set the us svn server in your hosts file; someone here will give you the magic settings :) I tend to cross my fingers and let site publication run overnight. All the different site publication strategies have been flawed in one way or another, this latest st

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 3)

2014-01-07 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2014/1/7 domi > Hi, > > We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit). > Details: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=18783 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-009/ > > Staged s

Inject from multiple interfaces in plexus ?

2014-01-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
With spring, you can say: @Component class X implements Y,Z And at call site: @Inject private Y y; @Inject private Z z; And expect (scope dependent) to get the same instance of X in both y and z. Can I achieve this in m3.2 core ? Kristian

Re: Change request procedure that spans multiple projects

2014-01-08 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Create one jira ticket for each project and create a 'depends on' link between the issues. K 8. jan. 2014 22:14 skrev "Jeffrey E Care" følgende: > Today I created an enhancement request for the assembly plugin ( > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-680). > > I would like to submit a patch

Re: Change request procedure that spans multiple projects

2014-01-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
munity components, and we have > done so in the past... just a question of the release manager deciding that > they are fine coupling the releases of multiple components in one vote. > > > On 9 January 2014 10:27, Barrie Treloar wrote: > > > On 9 January 2014 17:37, Kristian Rose

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven JVM Runtime requirements

2014-01-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
https://github.com/orfjackal/retrolambda 2014/1/13 Stephen Connolly > We are gearing up for the release of Maven 3.2.0... wherein we will drop > support for Java 1.5 as the runtime that Maven requires (we will still > support compiling and running tests with older JVMs via toolchains though) >

Re: JDK 8 Build 124 & JDK 7 Update 60 build 03 are available on java.net

2014-01-22 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Thanks, we saw that already. Preliminary checks seem to indicate things are much better ! I'll be running through our tests on windows, linux and OSX to see if there's anything else interesting to be found, I'll post a summary in couple of days time. Kristian 2014/1/22 Rory O'Donnell Oracle,

Re: Releasing 3.2.0

2014-01-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I had a solution for this problem using @Named, but i had trouble getting it to work, I probably did something wrong. I'll give it one more shot. Just move the issue along if I don't fix it by the time you cut the release. Kristian 2014-01-28 Jason van Zyl > There are only a few issues left w

Re: Further cleanup of Builders (extension of MNG-5575)

2014-02-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I can fremover weave mode entirely this weekend. It wasnt worth it. K 6. feb. 2014 16:06 skrev "Jason van Zyl" følgende: > Hi, > > I made a first pass at coalescing the logic for a specific way to build > (single threaded, multi threaded, weave) into its own implementation but > there is still m

Linkage error

2014-02-12 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Stuart, We're seeing java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: loader (instance of org/codehaus/plexus/classworlds/realm/ClassRealm) previously initiated loading for a different type with name "javax/enterprise/util/TypeLiteral" using the maven-jetty-plugin on 3.1. I can't really see th

Re: Linkage error

2014-02-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
It still breaks with 3.1.1; bugger :) 2014-02-13 10:23 GMT+01:00 Tamás Cservenák : > Maybe related to https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5513 ? > > As cdi-api is now also in core? > > > Thanks, > ~t~ > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Kristian Rosenvold &l

Re: Linkage error

2014-02-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
ve it a shot tonight. Kristian 2014-02-13 11:56 GMT+01:00 Stuart McCulloch : > On 13 Feb 2014, at 07:28, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: > > > Stuart, > > > > We're seeing java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: loader > > (instance of org/codehaus/ple

Re: Linkage error

2014-02-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
cross over like like the jetty/tomcat/wildfly-maven-plugin >> I think we should just tell people the best thing to do is fork once and do >> what you like. >> >> The CDI API is at least standardised (one of the reasons why the >>> container respects @Typed

Re: Linkage error

2014-02-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Well we'll always have the cutoff problem once we start leaking classes we don't really have any control over. Given a fairly marginal use case with probably just 1 user, I think my point is valid. These classes are in the javax.enterprise package space. That's "ee" to me. Even the modern ee stuff

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I think the main problem with especially maven-plugins is the sheer amount of work required to convert these to individual repositories, especially due to the somewhat not-good structure of the current clone. The others should be fairly straight forward, splitting maven-shared included. Kristian

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
somewhat cumbersome. > > ... and it therefore becomes important to migrate big repos piece by piece. > > > 2014-02-14 9:23 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold >: > > > I think the main problem with especially maven-plugins is the sheer > amount > > of work required to

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life

2014-02-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2014-02-14 10:17 GMT+01:00 Arnaud Héritier : > +1 > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 14 February 2014 02:14, Stephen Connolly > > wrote: > > > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August > > 2009. > > > > > > During that p

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-16 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Linking to podcasts and articles is intertresting, especially for those who haven't done it before. What this needs i a volunteer to do the task. K 16. feb. 2014 04:07 skrev "Mark Derricutt" følgende: > A really good podcast on the subject of migration a large project, and > large team from

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life

2014-02-16 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 14. feb. 2014 01:32 skrev "Olivier Lamy" følgende: > +1 > > On 14 February 2014 02:14, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August > 2009. > > > > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release. > > > > I would argu

Re: Release assembly plugin?

2014-02-24 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I'll spin through archiver issues hopefully tomorrow and by the looks of the pull requests I'll push 2.4.5. Kristian 2014-02-24 13:12 GMT+01:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi Brett, > > i have started to work on cleaning up the JIRA closing some issues which > are not up-to-date anymore etc. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release ASF Parent POM version 14

2014-03-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 2014-03-06 22:18 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY : > Hi, > > Changes since the last release: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-14/pom.xml?r1=HEAD&r2=1434717&diff_format=h > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-1000/ > > https://repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.17

2014-03-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 Just in time for jdk8 ga :) K 14. Mars 2014 00:44 skrev "Olivier Lamy" følgende: > +1 > Tested on few projects. > > Thanks! > Olivier > > > On 13 March 2014 08:52, Andreas Gudian wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > long ago since we released the last Surefire version. It's about time we > > change tha

Re: maven-jar-plugin:2.4 taking 15 minutes

2014-03-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Usually this means pc'er running out of entropy. Try installing randomsound K 14. Mars 2014 09:04 skrev "Vishal Kumar Gupta" følgende: > Hi Team, > OS - Ubuntu 12.04 TLS > > Issue:- > 1) maven version - 3.2.1 - when i run plugin maven-jar-plugin:2.4 it > completes in ~15 Minutes. > 2) maven vers

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Reactor Plugin

2014-03-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 22. Mars 2014 22:52 skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" følgende: > Hi, > > based on the decision we have made on the 18. february 2014 to define End > Of Life of Maven 2 http://maven.apache.org/maven-2.x-eol.html > > I would suggest to retire the Maven Reactor Plugin. > The last release has been made

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >