Re: Change Similarity in Solr MoreLikeThis

Hi Emmanuel, Sure, go for it! Cheers, Tommaso 2012/5/23 Emmanuel Espina > LUCENE-896 added support for changing the Similarity class of More > Like This but this functionality has not been exposed to Solr. I would > like to create a jira and submit a patch for this. > > Do you agree? > > Thanks

Re: branch_4x created

Nice step towards 4.0 :-) Tommaso 2012/5/29 Robert Muir > Here's the location: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x > > this is the branch for stable changes to go into 4.x releases. trunk > now targets 5.0. so this works just like trunk/3.x did a few months > ago, ex

Re: remove "via"

2012/6/6 Robert Muir > Hello, > > Currently we do this in CHANGES.txt: > > LUCENE-: > Fixed a horrible nasty bug. (Joe Contributor via John Doe Committer) > > I propose we remove "via " from CHANGES.txt. I don't > think any users care about who committed changes and I think it > de-emphasize

Re: Welcome Adrien Grand as a new Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome onboard Adrien! Cheers, Tommaso 2012/6/7 Michael McCandless > I'm pleased to announce that Adrien Grand has joined our ranks as a > committer. > > He has been contributing various patches to Lucene/Solr, recently to > Lucene's packed ints implementation, giving a nice performance gain in

Re: Welcome Greg Bowyer

Welcome onboard Greg! Cheers, Tommaso 2012/6/21 Erick Erickson > I'm pleased to announce that Greg Bowyer has been added as a > Lucene/Solr committer. > > Greg: > It's a tradition that you reply with a brief bio. > > Your SVN access should be set up and ready to go. > > Congratulations! > > Eric

Re: VOTE: 4.0-BETA

SmokeTestRelease checks passed, switching from 4-alpha to this for my applications was ok as well. +1 Tommaso 2012/8/7 Robert Muir > Artifacts here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.0bRC0-rev1370099/ > > The list of changes since 4.0-ALPHA is pretty large: lots of

Re: [jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3700) Create a Classification component

* reader.docFreq(c); // avg # of > unique terms per doc * # docs with c > this may be good (and much more performant), I'll give it a try, thanks :-) The NB classifier there is very simplistic and could much be improved (or at least provided with parameters / options) Apart from that

Re: Solr UIMA Notes

Hi Eric, 2012/8/10 Eric Pugh > Hi all, > > I've been working through the SolrUIMA demo, and have some changes to > propose based on going through it to make the UIMA stuff more accessible to > a new user. Since JIRA is down, I thought I would email my notes to the > list and see if anyone can c

Re: svn commit: r1384293 - in /lucene/dev/trunk: dev-tools/eclipse/dot.classpath dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py lucene/build.xml lucene/classification/src/java/org/apache/lucene/classification/

thanks Robert :) 2012/9/13 > Author: rmuir > Date: Thu Sep 13 12:12:10 2012 > New Revision: 1384293 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1384293&view=rev > Log: > LUCENE-4345: javadocs-lint, eclipse, smokeTester > > Added: > > lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/classification/src/java/org/apache/lucen

Re: 4.0 planning

2012/9/14 Robert Muir > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Michael McCandless > wrote: > > +1 to get 4.0 out soon. > > > > Looks like there are still 49 Solr issues marked for 4.0: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+SOLR+AND+resolut

Re: 4.0 planning

2012/9/14 Robert Muir > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:13 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) > wrote: > > Hi Rob. > > I think it's fairly critical that at least some of the Solr spatial > adapters > > get committed SOLR-3304. I've been working on it and related issues like > > LUCENE-4208. > > ~ David >

Re: 4.0 planning

2012/9/14 Robert Muir > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > > > > I see your point, second option sounds much better. > > We could perhaps make a shortly due roadmap like: > > - fix whatever you want by date x (2/3/4 weeks) > > - cod

Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)

Smoke test succeeded on MacOSX 10.7, plus tested in various running projects and everything seems fine. one thing I noticed is : "no package description (missing package.html in src?)" for most of the Solr source code therefore we should add those package(-info).html for the javadoc. However I don'

Re: missing javadocs/package.html

thanks Robert and Chris for coming back to this, I do agree with Robert those javadoc comments are very important and often just the first thing one dev would look into. Also it'd be nice to have the mentioned check in the build. Thanks, Tommaso 2012/9/28 Robert Muir > I will do this! > > On Fr

Re: 3.6 branching

+1, much easier. Tommaso 2012/3/22 Robert Muir > Hello, > > I propose for 3.6 that we don't create a release branch but just use > our branch_3x as the release branch. We can 'svn mv' it to > 'lucene_solr_3_6' when the release is ready. > > Normally we would branch and open up branch_3x as 3.7 f

Re: trunk javadoc failures?

having a quick look the problem may be in he classpath entry which doesn't get resolved correctly for some reason. I'm however giving a deeper look now. Tommaso 2012/3/22 Dawid Weiss > Run with ant -verbose and see what parameters get passed as classpath? > > Dawid > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8

Re: [JENKINS] branch-3x Build # 1333013101 - Failure

this is fixed in r1306768 (prefix parameter is no longer null), I assume it takes some time to sync. Tommaso 2012/3/29 Charlie Cron > Build failure running tests > > You can see the entire build log at > http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/1333013101.log > > Summary of tests that failed... > > > .

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6

+1 for the release and I agree with Mark and Robert's points. Tommaso 2012/4/6 Mark Miller > > On Apr 5, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > > > Its too late to discuss this issue for 3.6 > > +1. We don't even know *what* will end up happening on trunk until 4 is > released. Let's not get all

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)

+1 (tested on 2 different machines, Mac OSX 10.6/10.7) Tommaso 2012/4/6 Robert Muir > Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 > > I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my > +1. > Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) > >

Re: Solr-trunk - Build # 1387 - Failure

Hi Uwe, I think that is due to the patch being prepared before Steve committed the new Maven tooling, I'd be able to arrange time to work on fixing it before tomorrow. Regards, Tommaso 2011/1/24 Uwe Schindler > Same problem with UIMA. > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bre

Re: Solr-3.x - Build # 238 - Failure

Hi Steve, please let me know if I can help you any way. Cheers, Tommaso 2011/1/24 Steven A Rowe > I'm working on it now. - Steve > > > -Original Message- > > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] > > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 2:59 AM > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject

Re: Problems with Solr UIMA contrib maven dependencies [was: RE: Solr-3.x - Build # 238 - Failure]

l repo via the > “bootstrap” profile in the top-level POM. > > > > Steve > > > > *From:* Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu] > *Sent:* Monday, January 24, 2011 9:38 AM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: Solr-3.x - Build # 238 - Failure >

Re: Facet search

+1 (I've just crossed path with a Lucene faceting requirement) Tommaso 2011/2/23 Uwe Schindler > Strong +1!!! > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > -Original Message- > > From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:sim

Re: Solr Exception

Did you double check the element in your solrconfig.xml which points to the Tika jar you're using? 2011/3/9 Deepak Singh > > downloaded apache-solr-3.1 still it giving TIKA Exception > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Deepak Singh wrote: > >> oh, thanks for the better solution. >> >> >> On W

Re: termInfosIndexDivisor typo in the Solr-UIMA config?

Hi Otis, you're right, that can be safely changed to setTermIndexDivisor (note that line's commented so it's just for the matter of consistency I think). Tommaso 2011/4/11 Otis Gospodnetic > Hi, > > I was looking at term index divisor and spotted this: > > .../lucene-solr-3.1$ ffxg -i IndexDivis

Re: PipeLine for Solr

Hello Roland, I think a nice option would be using UIMA [1] which supports a pipeline architecture to analyze unstructured information. With that you can use CollectionReaders to get documents from various sources, Annotators to eventually extract metadata from documents [2] and then a Solr CAS Co

Re: Highlighting in fields other than content

I think your issue may depend on the keyword field having stored="false" or the field type not defining a Tokenizer. You may find the following useful: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase My 2 cents, Tommaso 2011/4/29 Pavel Kukačka > Hello, > >I've got a (probably trivial)

Re: Related project link to ManifoldCF from Solr site?

I think also Tika (tika.apache.org) and UIMA (uima.apache.org) could be added. Tommaso 2011/6/16 Mark Miller > > On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > > > a link in the related projects section seems possible, what do other > think? > > Seems fine to me - for open source projects

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

+1 Tommaso 2011/6/23 Robert Muir > Artifacts here: > > http://s.apache.org/lusolr33rc0 > > working release notes here: > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33 > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33 > > I ran the automated release test script in > trunk/dev-tools/scripts/smokeT

Re: [VOTE] Drop Java 5 support for trunk (Lucene 4.0)

+1 Tommaso 2011/6/27 Simon Willnauer > This issue has been discussed on various occasions and lately on > LUCENE-3239 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3239) > > The main reasons for this have been discussed on the issue but let me > put them out here too: > > - Lack of testing on J

Re: Welcome Tommaso Teofili as Lucene/Solr committer

Uwe, all 2012/1/26 Uwe Schindler > Hi, > > I'm happy to announce that the Lucene/Solr PMC has voted in Tommaso Teofili > as our newest committer. this makes me very very happy, I'll do my best to help this already great project and community grow and improve. > He

Re: Welcome Tommaso Teofili as Lucene/Solr committer

Thank you all guys for this warm welcome. Cheers, Tommaso p.s. I did update http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/whoweare.html but I didn't have the permission to change the /lucene/cms/trunk/content/whoweare.mdtext for the (yet unreleased) CMS based Lucene website 2012/1/28 Martijn v Groningen >

Re: Welcome Tommaso Teofili as Lucene/Solr committer

lr > checkout directly. The root webpage for both projects currently only > contains the PMC, no change needed. > > ** ** > > Uwe > > ** ** > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaph

Re: Welcome Tommaso Teofili as Lucene/Solr committer

; > > Uwe > > > > > > > > - > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > From: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012/1/31 Robert Muir > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller > wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > > >> I'd like to switch to the new sites over this weekend or early next > week at the latest > > > > +1 - Thanks for all of you effort on this! > > > >

Re: Welcome David Smiley

Welcome David! Cheers, Tommaso 2012/2/5 Grant Ingersoll > I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has elected to add David > Smiley as a committer to the Lucene/Solr project in recognition of his > ongoing contributions. > > David, custom is to say a little bit about yourself, so feel free

Re: svn commit: r1240035 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/src: java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/TypeTokenFilter.java test/org/apache/lucene/analysis/TestTypeTokenFilter.java

Thanks Uwe for noticing, I'll fix that. Tommaso 2012/2/4 Uwe Schindler > One more thing: > Please merge changes from trunk to 3.x, not only apply patch twice. More > info about the sometimes complicated merging (because of move to modules of > some code parts): http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java

Re: svn commit: r1240035 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/src: java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/TypeTokenFilter.java test/org/apache/lucene/analysis/TestTypeTokenFilter.java

Actually you just made the needed fixes, lesson learned, thanks again. Tommaso 2012/2/7 Tommaso Teofili > Thanks Uwe for noticing, I'll fix that. > Tommaso > > > 2012/2/4 Uwe Schindler > >> One more thing: >> Please merge changes from trunk to 3.x, not o

Re: Welcome James Dyer

Welcome James! Tommaso 2012/2/10 Grant Ingersoll > I'm pleased to announce the PMC has elected James Dyer to be a committer > on the project and he has agreed to join. > > Welcome aboard, James! > > -Grant > - > To unsubscribe,

Re: Welcome Christian Moen as committer

Welcome Christian! Tommaso 2012/2/14 Robert Muir > I'm pleased to announce that Christian Moen has joined our ranks as a > committer. > > He has been contributing to our language capabilities, especially > filling the gap for the Japanese language. > > Christian, its tradition that you introduce

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 1738 - Still Failing

Hi Robert, 2012/2/15 Robert Muir > I think these are thread-safety problems related to using the same > analysis engine instance? > > See prototype patch on > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731, this is also > causing some performance issues I think. > > Currently I think because

Re: [important] Refactoring of tests infrastructure.

Nice improvements! +1 Tommaso 2012/2/17 Dawid Weiss > Hi everyone, > > as part of this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785 > > I've been working on moving away from ant-macros to a custom ANT task; > potential benefits are mentioned as part of the issue's description. > > There

Re: Welcome Sami Siren as committer

Welcome Sami! Tommaso 2012/2/19 Robert Muir > I'm pleased to announce that Sami Siren has joined our ranks as a > committer. > > He has been contributing various patches to Lucene/Solr, especially to > Solr's distributed indexing capabilities. > > Sami, its tradition that you introduce yourself

Re: Welcome Stefan Matheis

Welcome Stefan! Tommaso 2012/2/29 Ryan McKinley > I'm pleased to announce that Stefan Matheis has joined our ranks as a > committer. > > He has given the solr admin UI some much needed love. It now looks > like it belongs in 2012! > > Stefan, it is tradition that you introduce yourself with a b

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 12568 - Still Failing

Hi Uwe, I just checked in the fix for that, should be ok now. Tommaso 2012/3/1 Uwe Schindler > Hi Tommaso: > > Can you check the javadocs-warnings? We have now 15 of them and this fails > the Jenkins builds...: > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12568/console > > Uwe >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 1846 - Still Failing

I removed too many lines inside its build.xml in r1295508 commit, I'm working to fix it. Tommaso 2012/3/1 Steven A Rowe > Tomasso, it looks like the solr/contrib/uima/ build is broken? > > -Original Message- > From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk...@builds.apache.org] > Sent: Thursda

Re: The two non-deterministic solr tests (BasicZkTest, BasicDistributedZkTest)

Hi Dawid, I'll have a look at those tests and see if I can figure out what the problem is. Tommaso 2012/3/3 Dawid Weiss > Guys, are these tests broken or is it something with the timing > (races)? They do fail for me pretty consistently although they are not > reproducible for any particular see

Re: The two non-deterministic solr tests (BasicZkTest, BasicDistributedZkTest)

As far as I can see from Jenkins build reports it seems they're only failing during the Maven job, not for ant, is that something that is true for you as well Dawid?. I think at leaste the BasicZkTest failure depends (also?) on the amount of load on the machine during the tests which makes the time

Re: ideas for alphas/betas?

2012/3/7 Robert Muir > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > > I agree. > > > > Maybe we should also tag issues as 4.0-alpha, 4.0-beta in JIRA? For > > 4.0-alpha we'll tag all the issues that are expected to change the index > > format, and 4.0-beta all the issues that require API

maxFieldLength clarifications

Hi all, I am using Solr 3.4 and I am indexing 10KB to 10MB size documents and I've realized some of them hit the maxFieldLength settings in solrconfig. I see from previous threads [1] some people solve this issue splitting the document in smaller chunks and "rebuilding" it at query time with field

Re: svn commit: r1361819 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/analysis/uima/src/test/org/apache/lucene/analysis /uima/UIMABaseAnalyzerTest.java

even if it resolves to the same value I agree it's more consistent to use the TEST_VERSION_CURRENT, thanks Hoss. Tommaso 2012/7/16 Chris Hostetter > > : URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1361819&view=rev > : Log: > : [LUCENE-4207] - updated LuceneVersion to 5.0 > > Isn't this what LuceneTest

Re: Small error in IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException javadocs

thanks Alan, I'll change that. Tommaso 2012/7/24 Alan Woodward > The example code for IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(E extends > Exception, Closeable…) in its javadoc comment refers to closeSafely(), > rather than closeWhileHandlingException(). > > Sufficiently trivial that I didn't think o

Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)

+1 smoke tests are ok. Tommaso 2012/10/6 Michael McCandless > +1 > > Smoke tester is happy in my env (Ubuntu 12.04, Javas 1.6.0_32 / 1.7.0_04). > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > > artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 4.0 released.

2012/10/12 Uwe Schindler > Thanks Robert for doing the hard work of managing this release! > > I am happy that the release finally came out, after a long time of > development, code refactoring, and lots of non-finite beer-automatons! > yes, great job guys! :-) Tommaso > > Uwe > - > Uwe S

Re: Ant command for installing Lucene and Solr Maven dependencies locally?

'ant run-maven-build' should do the trick. Tommaso 2012/10/29 Jason Rutherglen > I have used 'ant generate-maven-artifacts' to generate the Maven > artifacts. Is there a target to install them locally? > > - > To unsubscribe, e

Re: Ant command for installing Lucene and Solr Maven dependencies locally?

try "ant run-maven-build -DskipTests=true", hope this helps, Tommaso 2012/10/29 Jason Rutherglen > Any way to make it skip tests? > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > > 'ant run-maven-build' should do the trick. > >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/ibm-j9-jdk7) - Build # 6692 - Failure!

I could reproduce it, with ant test -Dtestcase=UIMABaseAnalyzerTest -Dtests.seed=BE68034CE6D929B8 -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=ca -Dtests.timezone=Pacific/Rarotonga -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 I'll look into it. Tommaso 2013/7/23 Policeman Jenkins Server > Build: ht

Re: Welcome Cassandra Targett as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome onboard Cassandra! Tommaso 2013/8/1 Robert Muir > I'm pleased to announce that Cassandra Targett has accepted to join our > ranks as a committer. > > Cassandra worked on the donation of the new Solr Reference Guide [1] and > getting things in order for its first official release [2]. >

Re: Solr faceting vs. Lucene faceting

2012/12/11 Robert Muir > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Yonik Seeley > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > >> The taxonomy manages the global ordinals for categories. > > > > I wonder if there's a way to do global ordinals w/ a codec instead of > > a sidecar index

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

+1 Tommaso 2012/12/21 Simon Willnauer > same here +1 > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen > wrote: > > Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1

+1 Tommaso 2013/1/17 Steve Rowe > Please vote to release Lucene and Solr 4.1. > > Unless respinning becomes necessary, I plan to keep the vote open until > Monday, since the 72 hour VOTE period extends into the weekend. > > RC1 artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr41rc1 > > The smoke

[DISCUSS] Enable javadoc check on Solr too

Hi all, What do you think about (re) enabling javadoc check for Solr build too? At start it may be a little annoying (since a lot of Solr code misses proper javadoc thus we may have lots of failing builds) but that should turn in being a very useful thing for devs once that's fixed and we keep add

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable javadoc check on Solr too

> support that. I personally don't refer to javadoc (by itself) during > development - so normal comments work just as well. Documentation of > methods should be on an as-needed basis, not mandated everywhere. > > -Yonik > http://lucidworks.com > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable javadoc check on Solr too

...and surely working in a branch as suggested by Alan would be a good idea :-) Thanks Alan, Tommaso 2013/1/18 Tommaso Teofili > I see Yonik and Jack's points which look reasonable, but, at least for my > experience, even if Solr is meant to be a "server" it often happ

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0

+1 Tommaso 2013/9/19 Kranti Parisa > +1 > > Thanks, > Kranti K. Parisa > http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Jack Krupansky > wrote: > >> +1 for my quick test. Even tried the UI on IE10. >> >> -- Jack Krupansky >> >> -Original Message- From

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC5

+1 Tommaso 2013/9/29 Mark Miller > +1 > > - Mark > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Please vote to release the following artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC5-rev1527178/ >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> -- >> Adrien >> >

Re: Welcome Joel Bernstein

Welcome Joel ! Tommaso 2013/10/3 Grant Ingersoll > Hi, > > The Lucene PMC is happy to welcome Joel Bernstein as a committer on the > Lucene and Solr project. Joel has been working on a number of issues on > the project and we look forward to his continued contributions going > forward. > > We

Re: Welcome Ryan Ernst as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ryan! Tommaso 2013/10/14 Adrien Grand > I'm pleased to announce that Ryan Ernst has accepted to join our ranks > as a committer. > > Ryan has been working on a number of Lucene and Solr issues and > recently contributed the new expressions module[1] which allows for > compiling javascr

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.1 RC1

+1 Tommaso 2013/10/21 Adrien Grand > +1 > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > +1 > > > > -Yonik > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Mark Miller > wrote: > >> Please vote to release the following artifacts: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_so

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.6.0) - Build # 237 - Failure!

that's probably due to another unsupported-by-codec operation which unexpectedly returns -1 (see LUCENE-4782), now inspecting. Tommaso 2013/2/21 Policeman Jenkins Server > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX/237/ > Java: 64bit/jdk1.6.0 -XX:+UseParallelGC > > 1 tests fa

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b78) - Build # 4514 - Failure!

any idea about the cause? 2013/3/2 Uwe Schindler > JDK 8 b78 seems to hang 30% of the runs in this UIMA test. The JVM is > completely irresponsible and can only be killed with "kill -9". > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 4.2

+1 smoke tests passed, tests in my own applications were good too. Tommaso 2013/3/7 Robert Muir > URL: > http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_2_r1453694/ > > Thanks for testing. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-

Re: Welcome Stefan Matheis to the PMC

Congrats Stefan! Tommaso 2013/3/10 David Smiley (@MITRE.org) > Congrats Stefan! And terrific work on Solr's admin UI -- its both useful > and > a pleasure to use. > ~ David > > > > - > Author: > http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book > -- > View this message

Re: JVM hanging when using G1GC on JDK8 b78 or b79 (Linux 32 bit)

thanks Uwe! 2013/3/12 Robert Muir > Uwe: Thanks for working with them to get all these issues fixed. > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > FYI, Oracle has a fix for the G1GC hang in UIMA waiting for review: > > > > Issue: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.6.0"

+1 >> SUCCESS! [2:50:09.253204] () however we have the usual >> ***WARNING***: javadocs want to fail! for Solr (which IMHO we should fix) Regards, Tommaso 2013/11/14 Shai Erera > Smoke tester passes for me. +1! > > Shai > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Simon Willnauer < > simon

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.6.0 Take 3

+1 Tommaso 2013/11/20 Jan Høydahl > +1 > Happy smoketester on Mac > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > 19. nov. 2013 kl. 15:11 skrev Simon Willnauer : > > > Please vote for the third Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.6.0 > > (don't be irritat

Re: Welcome Han Jiang as a new Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Han! Tommaso 2013/6/8 Adrien Grand > I'm pleased to announce that Han Jiang has accepted to join our ranks > as a committer. > > Han participated to last year's summer of code and contributed a new > block postings format which became the default one in Lucene/Solr 4.1, > bringing spee

Re: Welcome Tommaso Teofili to the PMC

thank you all! Tommaso 2013/3/17 Shalin Shekhar Mangar > Congratulations Tommaso! > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Tommaso Teofili has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to join.

Re: Welcome David Smiley to the PMC

Welcome David! Tommaso 2013/3/18 Smiley, David W. > Thanks Steve, and to the rest of the PMC members! I hope to see many of > you at Lucene/Solr Revolution in May. > > ~ David > > On 3/18/13 10:13 AM, "Steve Rowe" wrote: > > >I'm pleased to announce that David Smiley has accepted the PMC's >

Re: Welcome Shawn Heisey as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Shawn! Tommaso 2013/3/19 Steve Rowe > I'm pleased to announce that Shawn Heisey has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer. > > Shawn, it's tradition that you introduce yourself with a brief bio. > > Once your account has been created - could take a few days - you'll be

Re: GSoC 2013

Hello Raimon, depending on what focus your master thesis should be Lucene / Solr may or not be the right project. Basically if your sentiment analysis topic is tight to information retrieval (very dummy example: making a search engine which scores documents boosting "positive" ones) then it could

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.2.1 RC2

+1 Tommaso 2013/3/26 Mark Miller > Is that a +1 ? :) > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > smokeTestRelease ran successfully on my machine. > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: de

Re: Welcome Adrien Grand to the PMC

Welcome Adrien! Tommaso 2013/3/29 Steve Rowe > I'm pleased to announce that Adrien Grand has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > Welcome Adrien! > > - Steve > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.

Re: Welcome Shalin Shekhar Mangar to the PMC

Welcome Shalin! Tommaso 2013/4/4 Steve Rowe > I'm pleased to announce that Shalin Shekhar Mangar has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > Welcome Shalin! > > - Steve > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.

Re: [VOTE] Lucene Solr 4.3.0 RC3

+1, smoke tests pass. Tommaso 2013/4/23 Simon Willnauer > Here is a new RC candidate... > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC3-rev1470846/ > > here is my +1 > > thanks for voting... > > simon > > ---

Re: Welcome Atri Sharma as Lucene/Solr committer

Congrats and welcome Atri! Regards, Tommaso On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 08:55, Atri Sharma wrote: > Thank you so much! > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 23:05, Furkan KAMACI > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Congrats Atri! >> >> Kind Regards, >> Furkan KAMACI >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:47 PM Atri Sharma wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.3.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:30:05.298235] On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 16:20, MUNENDRA S N wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:28:14.138771] > > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 8:12 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:52:34.599842] >> >> I still think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13977 is >> impo

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.4.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:33:40.587556] On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 11:37, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:50:00.981792] > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:53 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.4.0 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.4.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:28:25.980994] Regards, Tommaso On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 04:34, Nhat Nguyen wrote: > +1 > SUCCESS! [0:57:57.529512] > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 6:04 PM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > >> SUCCESS! [1:21:34.167550] >> >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 2:56 PM Anshum Gupta >> wrote:

Re: Welcome Alessandro Benedetti as a Lucene/Solr committer

welcome on board Alessandro, well deserved! I still remember when we were sitting together in the same room having fun with Lucene/Solr a few years ago, keep up the good job ! Regards, Tommaso On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 14:01, David Smiley wrote: > Hi all, > > Please join me in welcoming Alessandro

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

+1 (binding) Tommaso On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Dear Lucene and Solr developers! > > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr devel

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:30:49.112899] Regards, Tommaso On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 14:47, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:44:04.877619] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:41 AM Andras Salamon > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> SUCCESS! [1:50:12.408588

Re: Welcome Tim Allison as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Tim!!! Tommaso Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018 alle ore 22:30 Steve Rowe ha scritto: > > Welcome Tim! > > Steve > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 12:20 PM Erick Erickson > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Tim Allison as the latest Lucene/Solr committer! >> >> Congratulations and

Re: Welcome Gus Heck as Lucene/Solr committer

welcome Gus! Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mar 6 nov 2018 alle ore 01:24 Christian Moen ha scritto: > > Congrats, Gus! > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:11 AM Otis Gospodnetić > wrote: >> >> Another welcome, Gus! >> >> Otis >> -- >> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection >> Solr & E

Re: Welcome Mayya Sharipova as Lucene/Solr committer

congrats and welcome onboard Mayya! Regards, Tommaso On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 19:27, Trey Grainger wrote: > Woohoo - awesome news! Congrats, Mayya! > > Trey Grainger > Founder, Searchkernel > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:58 PM jim ferenczi wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Pleas

Re: Welcome Atri Sharma to the PMC

Welcome Atri! Tommaso On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 11:47, Namgyu Kim wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Atri! :D > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:11 PM Noble Paul wrote: > >> Welcome Atri! >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:08 PM Dawid Weiss >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Congratulations and welcome, Atri.

Re: LSH/MinHash

Hi Andy, It would be very nice if you could do that and I'd be very interested in reviewing and helping out with the patch. I have been using that filter for a while with my own query bits; a full fledged query parser would surely be a very useful contribution. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 15 o

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0

I'd like to backport https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8659 (upgrade to OpenNLP 1.9.1) to 8x branch, if there's still time. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 28 gen 2019 alle ore 07:59 Adrien Grand ha scritto: > > Hi Noble, > > No it hasn't created yet. > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:55 A

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0

ker issues that are still open this leaves another week to work on a > patch and we can update the status at the end of the week in order to decide > if we can start the first build candidate > early next week. Would that work for you ? > > Le lun. 28 janv. 2019 à 10:19, Tommaso T

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:23:18.214164] Il giorno mer 19 set 2018 alle ore 14:39 Adrien Grand ha scritto: > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:30:09.416660] > > Le mer. 19 sept. 2018 à 12:21, Andrzej Białecki a écrit : >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:42:09.201482] >> >> >> On 19 Sep 2018, at 03:56, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >> wro

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >