Re: Ant command for installing Lucene and Solr Maven dependencies locally?

Jason, See dev-tools/README.maven for how run the Maven build. In short, to install all Lucene/Solr artifacts without running tests: ant get-maven-poms cd maven-build mvn -DskipTests install Steve On Oct 29, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Any way to mak

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #153: POMs out of sync

I committed a fix to the Maven configuration: Derby is now a DIH test dependency On Nov 13, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x/153/ > > 9 tests failed. > FAILED: > org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.TestSqlEntityProcesso

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #157: POMs out of sync

On Nov 17, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Dawid Weiss wrote: >> Curious that Maven is seeing these failures while the Ant build isn't. > > I think it does. Or it did. It's been eerily quiet -- I agree -- but I > haven't been in sync with the latest changes so I don't know what you > guys did to shut jenkins

Re: Trying out the commit bot tagger at a larger scale

+1 On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > If nobody objects, I'm ready to try extending the commit bot jira > tagger to the whole dev group. > > -- > - Mark > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.ap

Re: ant precommit; annoyed with "checkout is dirty"

I've always put patches up one level from checked out dirs: svn diff > ../PROJECT-.patch; patch -p0 < ../PROJECT-.patch. For stuff that should be ignored by everybody (or that wouldn't cause trouble for others), we could add them to the svn:ignore list for the directory they're in? Alt

Re: ant precommit; annoyed with "checkout is dirty"

I guess there are two classes of things here: new non-ignored non-svn-controlled files; and modifications to svn-controlled files. My point about svn:ignore was that we could use it to handle the non-ignored non-svn-controlled files case. I guess you're talking about the svn-controlled modified

Re: Active 4.x branches?

Hi Per, Have you seen ? I don't think the current development branches are listed anywhere, but this doesn't change very often. Feel free to add info to the above wiki page. I recommend you subscribe to the commits mailing list, where you wi

Re: Active 4.x branches?

there is a lot you can do without commit rights. Steve On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Per Steffensen wrote: > Steve Rowe skrev: >> Hi Per, >> >> > Hi Steve > > Thanks a lot for answering so quickly! >> Have you seen <http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/H

Re: Solr/Lucene 4.4 > 170 issues released/closed

Any objections to branching in a week (on July 8), and then cutting an RC a week later (July 15)? Steve On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi, > > There was a mention of a quick Solr 4.4 release a few weeks back. Had > a look at JIRA, so FYI: > > ~100 resolved/closed issu

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 2995 - Failure!

Erick, I can repro on Windows, so I can test it once you have a fix. - Steve On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Gah. I'll try a quick fix since I don't have a Windows box. Looks like the > same junk with file separator that's tripped me up before. > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013

Re: svn commit: r1499074 - /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/core/TestCoreDiscovery.java

After svn up'ing trunk, TestCoreDiscovery.testDuplicateNames (and all other tests in that suite) now pass for me on Windows. - Steve On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:44 PM, er...@apache.org wrote: > Author: erick > Date: Tue Jul 2 19:44:46 2013 > New Revision: 1499074 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r14990

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #376: POMs out of sync

I'll look into it. - Steve On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > this happens because the POMs are really out of sync :) > > I think maven depends on asm-4.1 but ant does not? > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Apache Jenkins Server > wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/jo

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #376: POMs out of sync

The Tika 1.3->1.4 upgrade caused the tika-parsers dep's transitive asm:asm dep (unused by L/S) to change to org.ow2.asm:asm-debug-all. I committed a fix renaming the exclusion under tika-parsers in the grandparent POM. On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > I'

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 3004 - Failure!

I've looked into it briefly - on my Windows box, there's a file "jar1.jar" that isn't getting deleted, apparently because the class loader is holding it open after the test accesses a resource inside the archive, so the containing temp directory can't be deleted. It's quite strange though, sinc

Re: [CONF] Apache Solr Reference Guide > Uploading Data with Index Handlers

Hoss set up a CWIKI account named lucene_pmc_notification_role to watch the ref guide and email commits@l.a.o when content changes. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4887 for some details. Lucene PMC members have access to the credentials for this CWIKI role - I logged in as that

4.4 release planning

As I mentioned a week ago, I plan on branching for 4.4 today, likely late in the day (UTC+4). If all goes well, I'll cut an RC in one week, on July 15th. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional

Re: 4.4 release planning

4.4 branch created. On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > As I mentioned a week ago, I plan on branching for 4.4 today, likely late in > the day (UTC+4). > > If all goes well, I'll cut an RC in one w

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4916) Add support to write and read Solr index files and transaction log files to and from HDFS.

Thanks Uwe! On Jul 11, 2013 4:31 AM, "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" < j...@apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13705597#comment-13705597] > > ASF subversion a

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.4 - Build # 1 - Failure

Robert, I tried to grant you access - only PMC chairs can do this - see . Uwe, could you run the command listed there for Robert? (account name 'rmuir') Steve On Jul 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Robert Mu

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.4 - Build # 1 - Failure

On Jul 11, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > And this is a serious problem because only like 2 people have access to > jenkins (and neither seems to know how to configure this correctly). I agree, we should grant more people access - see my previous email on this thread asking Uwe to grant

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #909: POMs out of sync

Mike, That's the right thing for Maven config - not sure why analyzers-common was in there already. I'm running the Maven build now with this fix to make sure. (By the way, the IntelliJ config needs these two deps added as well - I'll take care of it.) Steve On Jul 15, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Mich

[VOTE] Release 4.4

Please vote to release Lucene and Solr 4.4, built off revision 1503555 of . RC0 artifacts are available at: http://people.apache.org/~sarowe/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.4.0-RC0-rev1503555 The smoke tester passes for me. Here

4.4 release note drafts

I've taken a first pass at 4.4 release notes - please review/edit: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote44 http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote44 Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org Fo

Re: 4.4 release note drafts

On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > Core discovery mode now exists, and the standard example uses it. I agree - I think the release notes should at a minimum point to a discussion of the changes in 4.4 and maybe also in trunk. I don't know how to write it up though. Steve ---

Re: 4.4 release note drafts

On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > Looks good, maybe we should add something about segments flushed by > indexwriter using CFS by default, just so we don't have lots of questions on > the users list when they see CFS being used where it wasnt before. > > We could also mention som

TODO: Remove download links to the 3.6.2 release from the Lucene and Solr websites

I think we should stop encouraging people to download the 3.6.2 release - those big "Download 3.6.2" buttons on every website page should go away. We can then also remove the 3.6.2 releases from the distribution mirrors - they will still live on at http://archive.apache.org/dist/ so people can g

Re: for those of you using gmail...

On Jul 17, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > Can you try this search in your gmail: > >from:jenk...@thetaphi.de regression "build 6605" > > And let me know if you get 1 or 0 results back? I get 0 results. When I remove "regression", I get 1 result. > Furthermore, if I search

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.4

eNGramTokenizer/Filter are disabled in > the Solr example config. > > See: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3907 > (Eliminated side="back"). > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Steve Rowe > Sent: Tuesday

[VOTE] Release 4.4 RC1

Please vote to release Lucene and Solr 4.4, built off revision 1504776 of . RC1 artifacts are available at: http://people.apache.org/~sarowe/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.4.0-RC1-rev1504776 The smoke tester passes for me. Here'

[RESULT][VOTE] Release 4.4 RC1

This vote has passed. I'll start the release process now. Steve On Jul 19, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Please vote to release Lucene and Solr 4.4, built off revision 1504776 of > <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_4>. >

Re: svn commit: r870606 - in /websites/production/lucene/content: core/4_4_0/ core/4_4_0/analyzers-common/ core/4_4_0/analyzers-common/org/ core/4_4_0/analyzers-common/org/apache/ core/4_4_0/analyzers

Yes, only 48 minutes to upload!!! Since Shalin disabled the hourly website update for twitter/svn, checkouts don't get stale, and long commits can succeed. Steve On Jul 22, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Yeah, you managed it in one commit! > > > > sar...@apache.org schrieb: >

Re: [CONF] Apache Solr Reference Guide > Schema API

Comment spam, hooray. I deleted the spammer's comment and disabled their account. Confluence now says "This user has been disabled. This user will not be able to log in to Confluence." Not sure if this is better than removing the user's account? I guess we'll have to see how prevalent this w

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 4.4 released

July 2013, Apache Solr™ 4.4 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.4 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, d

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 4.4 released

July 2013, Apache Lucene™ 4.4 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 4.4 Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires full-text sea

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

I noticed that the ref guide was missing a page about upgrading to Solr 4.4 (there is such a page for releases 4.1 through 4.3), so I created one, based on upgrade notes and bug fixes from CHANGES.txt: . Please edit it to

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

notes are under the "Major Changes from Solr 3 to Solr 4" page in the left-hand navigation pane. Depending on the nature of any changes we make for this, the new "Pre-publication acitons" section on the "Howto publish" internal page will need to be adjusted.

Re: VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

+1 On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > Please VOTE to release the following PDF as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf > > https://people.apache.org/~hossman/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4_RC2.pdf > > Changes since RC1... > > * Additional info from dsmiley on several pages related t

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

On Jul 25, 2013 6:00 PM, "Smiley, David W." wrote: > On 7/25/13 4:29 AM, "Steve Rowe" wrote: > > > > >I also noticed that David Smiley made a bunch of modifications, AFAICT to > >spatial and related topics, and it would be good to include those. > [

Re: svn commit: r1507224 - in /lucene/dev/trunk: lucene/site/xsl/index.xsl solr/site/xsl/index.xsl

Didn't occur to me, that's all. Would it actually be better in any tangible way? - Steve On Jul 26, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Moin, > > Why not use the Unicode Trandemark sign with &#; instead of the HTML > markup? Robert would be more happy :-) > > Uwe > > - > Uwe S

Re: svn commit: r1507224 - in /lucene/dev/trunk: lucene/site/xsl/index.xsl solr/site/xsl/index.xsl

> the fonts match better. ™ is the symbol in XML, so I would replace it > by that one. I can do it if you like! > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> -Origin

Re: VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

I told gpg to get Hoss's public key from a keyserver after copying the id from the linked hossman.asc file, then successfully 'gpg --verify'd the linked .asc detached signature file against the .pdf file. The linked .sha1 file checks successfully against the .pdf file. Re-affirming my +1. Stev

Re: Welcome Cassandra Targett as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Cassandra! On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:47 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Cassandra Targett has accepted to join our ranks > as a committer. > > Cassandra worked on the donation of the new Solr Reference Guide [1] and > getting things in order for its first official re

Proposal/request for comments: Solr schema annotation

In thinking about making the entire Solr schema REST-API-addressable (SOLR-4898), I'd like to be able to add arbitrary metadata at both the top level of the schema and at each leaf node, and allow read/write access to that metadata via the REST API. Some uses I've thought of for such a facility

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java7 - Build # 1506 - Failure

The email notification regex didn't catch the cause of the build failure (I'll fix the regex): --- -ecj-javadoc-lint-src: [ecj-lint] Compiling 617 source files [ecj-lint] invalid Class-Path header in manifest of jar file: /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java7/

Re: Using PatternAnalyzer

Ajay, In the future, please ask questions about *using* Lucene on the java-user mailing list - the dev list is for Lucene/Solr development discussion. PatternAnalyzer is deprecated, but will be available until Lucene 5.0. Alternatively, you can create your own equivalent analyzer using Pattern

Re: dev-tools/eclipse/dot.classpath is broken?

Hi Shai - it's safe to remove. On Dec 4, 2012 5:09 AM, "Shai Erera" wrote: > Hi > > It references lucene/analysis/icu/src/test-files but I don't see such > directory, and eclipse complains. > > Is it safe to remove it from dot.classpath or has it been moved elsewhere? > > Shai >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (32bit/jdk1.7.0_09) - Build # 3026 - Failure!

On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > I'd really love to have a per-module "ant precommit". +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (32bit/jdk1.7.0_09) - Build # 3026 - Failure!

I think one useful middle point might be to only run checks on modules that have pending changes. Yes, as Hoss points out, an unchanged module's javadocs might no longer work (etc.), but I don't think that's the common case. On Dec 4, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > Well perhaps there

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (32bit/jdk1.7.0_09) - Build # 3026 - Failure!

I'm running it. It takes just over 4 minutes for me. Pretty minor IMHO. On Dec 4, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I guess my point is that since no one runs it (except perhaps you), it's not > really helping anything. > > And the "broken build" is really more minor than a true broken

Re: Solr 4 in IntelliJ IDEA: make project errors

Hi Artyom, Quoting my response to your identical solr-user mailing list post: > Hi Artyom, > > The lucene_solr_4_0 branch IntelliJ setup works for me. > > Sounds like Ivy isn't succeeding in downloading dependencies. > > 'ant idea' calls 'ant resolve', which uses Apache Ivy to download binary

Re: Solr 4 in IntelliJ IDEA: make project errors

Artyom, When I run 'ant resolve' at the top level, after visiting lucene modules, solr modules are also visited, but I don't see that happening in your output below - only lucene modules are visited. How did you get the lucene_solr_4_0 branch? Maybe you only checked out lucene/? What top-lev

Re: Solr 4 in IntelliJ IDEA: make project errors

that's C:\Users\username\.ivy2\cache\ - just remove this directory and its contents. Steve On Dec 6, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Artyom, > > When I run 'ant resolve' at the top level, after visiting lucene modules, > solr modules are also visited, but I do

Re: HighlighterTest failure

Yeah, the original email on this thread is a truncated version of Erik Hatcher's 2005 email to the then java-dev@l.a.o list: , but with a different sender. The truncated Bugzilla email sent earlier today

Re: commit message format for tag bot

+1, thanks Mark! On Dec 9, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > Thanks Mark, this bot is very helpful, and now even more so! > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > Okay, I've made the following changes: > > 1. Doesn't look for the : after an issue id anymore, so LUCENE

Re: Commit Tag Bot down for a bit

FYI, the OpenOffice project got permission to run a similar bot (SVN->Bugzilla) on ASF hardware: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5004 Steve On Dec 5, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > FYI > > It seems my machines at home are down, so the commit tag bot won't be runni

ASF project branding requirements (finally) completed [was: RE: September Board Report Due]

I've addressed all three of the issues I identified below. I used CSS-positioned textual TMs for the logos instead of modifying the images. I've only looked at the result in Safari/OS X so far; I'd appreciate others taking a look and providing feedback. Thanks, Steve On 9/14/2012 at 1:59 AM,

Re: commit message format for tag bot

Maybe both - "trunk (5.X)" - since branch_5x doesn't exist yet, and the two labels now being used refer to directory names in Subversion. On Dec 9, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > Should we use 5x rather than trunk in the message? > > So that it's a little easier to follow when we move

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_09) - Build # 2121 - Failure!

Ant will add the value of environment variable $ANT_OPTS to its JVM invocation. Here's my definition, from my .bashrc: export ANT_OPTS='-Xmx1g -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Djava.awt.headless=true' Steve On Dec 10, 2012, at 5:24 PM, "Dyer, James" wrote: > This is the 2

Re: svn commit: r1420195 [3/13] - in /lucene/dev/trunk: lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/ar/ lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/bg/ lucene/analysis/co

On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > @ Steven Rowe: WE NEED A JFLEX RELEASE! Is there a chance to get one? Yes. I plan for this to be my Christmas vacation project :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lu

RE: svn commit: r1420580 - /lucene/dev/trunk/build.xml

Thanks Uwe, I'll look into it. On Dec 12, 2012 4:30 AM, "Uwe Schindler" wrote: > Hi, > > I committed the reorder of the checks. The dependency validation task > fails in Solr: > > [licenses] MISSING sha1 checksum file for: C:\Users\Uwe > Schindler\.m2\repository\org\jboss\netty\netty\3.2.2.Final\

Re: Welcome Sami Siren to the PMC

Welcome Sami! Steve On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I'm please to announce that Sami Siren has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > Welcome Sami! > > - Mark > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6 - Build # 1123 - Failure

From the build log: - Building remotely on lucene in workspace /home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6 […] hudson.util.IOException2: : No space left on device at hudson.XmlFile.write(XmlFile.java:180) at hudson.scm.SubversionSCM.checkout(SubversionSCM.j

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #710: POMs out of sync

I committed a fix for this (missing SHA1 file for randomizedtesting-runner dependency): upgraded to v2.0.7 in trunk and on branch_4x. On Dec 17, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/710/ > > No tests ran. > > Build Log:

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

+1 On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7 javadocs run after it failed for me.) I first had to install Java 5 using the manual instructions here (the linked script didn't work for

Re: It's an Xmas miracle!

Yesterday the ASF Jenkins Maven trunk job succeeded for the first time in two months! (The ASF Jenkins Maven branch_4x job has succeeded the last three runs.) Thanks Mark (and others fixing Solr tests)! Steve On Dec 25, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > Though, yes, there will still be

Re: svn commit: r1426839 - /lucene/dev/trunk/dev-tools/maven/pom.xml.template

Thanks Uwe On Dec 29, 2012 4:29 PM, wrote: > Author: uschindler > Date: Sat Dec 29 21:29:05 2012 > New Revision: 1426839 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1426839&view=rev > Log: > SOLR-3725: Update velocity also in Maven > > Modified: > lucene/dev/trunk/dev-tools/maven/pom.xml.templa

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #198: POMs out of sync

I'm working on it - I'll commit a fix in a couple minutes. - Steve On Jan 2, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Since the commit oft he carrotsearch updates, the maven build downloads > additional JAR files without a license/sha1 sum. > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-All

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #198: POMs out of sync

The Maven build does not download Lucene 3.6.0. There are already transitive dependency exclusions for this in the clustering POM. +1 to fix the checker though. Steve On Jan 2, 2013, at 11:02 AM, "Uwe Schindler" wrote: > Hi, > > It is worse: The Maven build also download Lucene 3.6.0 (bec

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #198: POMs out of sync

://repo1.maven.org/maven2 > [artifact:dependencies] Transferring 3K from central > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: >> >> The Maven build does not download Lucene 3.6.0. There are already >> transitive dependency exclusions for this in the

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #198: POMs out of sync

Cool! We should use this. On Jan 2, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/trunk/use/makepom.html > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Dawid Weiss > wrote: >> By the way - has anybody mastered the art of publishing maven bundles >> via ivy? Is think this is

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #198: POMs out of sync

On Jan 2, 2013, at 5:18 PM, "Uwe Schindler" wrote: > Unfortunately there is no way to apply a regex to a property value and assign > it to a new one (see e.g., > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1176071/replacing-characters-in-ant-property) I disagree. The "get-svn-info" macro in lucene/comm

RE: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #198: POMs out of sync

Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:39 AM > > T

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #203: POMs out of sync

Looks like it's reappeared: < http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|org.eclipse.jetty|jetty-start|8.1.8.v20121106|jar > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > The whole jetty folder disappeared in maven/ivy. No release anymore > visible. Maybe a temporary problem. > > Uwe > >

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #729: POMs out of sync

Someone from infra put the necessary credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml at my request. I'll ask them to do that again. In the future, rather than nuking all of ~/.m2/, you could just nuke ~/.m2/repository/, which would leave settings.xml in place. Steve On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Uwe Schin

Re: svn commit: r1186 [1/3] - /release/lucene/KEYS

I went and looked at and copied what appeared in my web browser when I went to . I was guessing that this thing is auto-generated, but maybe not? Is there some more

Re: Solr & Lucene JIRA partly broken?

Hi Otis, Yesterday (and maybe earlier today?) I was seeing that error message, but now when I click on those links, I see the right thing. Steve On Jan 9, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi, > > I'm clicking on "4.1" at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR and am > getting

Re: 4.1 release

As of now, there are two Blocker issues in JIRA with Fix Version 4.1: Dataimporting with SolrCloud Fails https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4112 modify release process/scripts to use svn for rc/release publishing (svnpubsub) https://issues.apache.org/jira

Re: 4.1 release

; On Jan 10, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> I'd like to release soon. What else blocks this? > > I think we should toss out a short term date (next tuesday?) for anyone to > get in what they need for 4.1. > > Then just consider blockers after branching? &g

Re: 4.1 release

of nowhere doesn't seem right to me. > > We have a lot of people working on this over a lot of timezones. I think we > should do the right thing and give everyone at least a few days and a weekend > to finish getting their issues into 4.1. > > - Mark > > On Jan 10,

Re: 4.1 release

drag it out another > month. But let's not do the reverse and release it tonight. The sensible > approach always seems like we should plan out some target dates on the list - > dates that actually give devs a chance to respond to - and then follow > through on those dates. > &g

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #212: POMs out of sync

The POMs really are out of sync: - -validate-maven-dependencies: [licenses] MISSING sha1 checksum file for: /home/hudson/.m2/repository/org/apache/velocity/velocity/1.6.4/velocity-1.6.4.jar [licenses] Scanned 32 JAR file(s) for licenses (in 0.14s.), 1 error(s). - I'll make an adjustmen

RE: looking for package org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard

Hi Jim, Try getting rid of the provided lines. Steve On Jan 14, 2013 5:38 AM, "JimAld" wrote: > Thanks to everyone, I feel I'm getting somewhere, but not quite there yet. > I > currently have the below in my pom. When I change my import to: > import org.apache.lucene.queryparser.classic.QueryPa

4.1 branch

For anyone with pending patches: I plan on branching for 4.1 at around 1:00pm US EST. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1433005 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x: ./ dev-tools/ dev-tools/scripts/checkJavadocLinks.py

Thanks Robert. - Steve On Jan 14, 2013, at 12:41 PM, rm...@apache.org wrote: > Author: rmuir > Date: Mon Jan 14 17:41:01 2013 > New Revision: 1433005 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1433005&view=rev > Log: > whitelist this link > > Modified: >lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/ (prop

Re: 4.1 branch

branches/lucene_solr_4_1/ is open for business! I'm going to change version strings in branch_4x from 4.1 to 4.2 now. Steve On Jan 14, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > For anyone with pending patches: I plan on branching for 4.1 at around 1:00pm

Re: 4.1 branch

On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > branches/lucene_solr_4_1/ is open for business! > > I'm going to change version strings in branch_4x from 4.1 to 4.2 now. Done. - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: 4.1 branch

Thanks Robert, I've done this. - Steve On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > The 4.1 index format is different from 4.0: we also need to generate > 4.1 indexes and add the zip files/hook into TestBackCompat to 4.x and > trunk > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:22 P

Re: 4.1 release

should have a known date that we agree on that gives >>>> developers some time to finish what they are working on or what they >>>> believe >>>> is important for the release. At a minimum there should be a few days for >>>> this. A weekend involved o

4.1 RC plan

I've pushed most JIRAs marked with 4.1 Fix Version to 4.2. Only one marked as Blocker remains: LUCENE-4134 : "modify release process/scripts to use svn for rc/release publishing (svnpubsub)". For most of the remaining 7 issues with 4.1 Fix Ver

Re: 4.1 RC plan

FYI, here is a JIRA filter for unresolved 4.1 issues: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20(LUCENE%2CSOLR)%20AND%20resolution%3DUnresolved%20AND%20fixversion%3D%224.1%22> On Jan 15, 2013, at 9:12 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > I've pushed most JIRAs marked with 4

Re: problem with 'ant resolve'

Hi Shai, Nuking your ivy cache dir will probably fix the problem - by default this is at ~/.ivy2/cache/. Steve On Jan 15, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Shai Erera wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to run, unsuccessfully since last night, 'ant resolve' and always > hitting this error: > > > resolve: > [ivy:

Re: problem with 'ant precommit'

Shai, Uwe dealt with this exact (apparently J9-specific) issue on his Jenkins box a couple of months ago: Steve On Jan 16, 2013, at 12:52 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > I always

[VOTE] Release 4.1

Please vote to release Lucene and Solr 4.1. Unless respinning becomes necessary, I plan to keep the vote open until Monday, since the 72 hour VOTE period extends into the weekend. RC1 artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr41rc1 The smoke tester passes for me. Here's my +1. Steve ---

4.1 release notes: please review

I took a crack at the Solr release note. I added CommonTermsQuery to the Lucene release note that Robert has been maintaining - looks good to me otherwise. Please help me whip these into shape. Solr: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote41 Lucene: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNo

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1

ention changed? > > Many thanks, > > Christian Moen > アティリカ株式会社 > http://www.atilika.com > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> Please vote to release Lucene and Solr 4.1. >> >> Unless respinning becomes necessary, I plan to keep th

Re: 4.1 release notes: please review

Some custom > evaluators may require code changes. Specifically, public or protected > methods from the EvaluatorBag class have been moved to the Evaluator abstract > class that all Evalutators must extend. See > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4086 > -- > >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1

Sorry, Christian, I should have pointed to the JIRA issue for the "apache-" prefix removal: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4287> - Steve On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Thanks for bringing up the "apache-" prefix issue, Christian,

Re: 4.1 release notes: please review

Do you think it is appropriate that we put all of this in a section in the > release notes, or something more succinct? > > James Dyer > E-Commerce Systems > Ingram Content Group > (615) 213-4311 > > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.c

Re: 4.1 release notes: please review

> * Many improvements to DataImportHandler UI > > > * Core creation and deletion now updates the main/left list of cores > * Admin Cores UI now redirects to newly created core details > > * Deleted documents are calculated/displayed. > > > * Allow multiple Items

Re: 4.1 release notes: please review

Stefan, I've gone ahead and incorporated your changes into the release note. Thanks, Steve On Jan 17, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Thanks Stefan, can you go ahead and make these modifications? I like the > "priority" sorting you suggested, though I haven&#

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >