Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-25-ea+15) - Build # 54156 - Still Failing!

2025-03-31 Thread Dawid Weiss
I've applied tidy on main. D. On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:29 AM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/54156/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-25-ea+15 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC > > All tests passed > > --

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-25-ea+15) - Build # 54156 - Still Failing!

2025-03-31 Thread Dawid Weiss
No worries. On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:03 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Thanks Dawid! > > My fault, the script "addVersion.py" didn't apply cleanly in main and > I had to manually change things and I forgot to apply tidy at the end. > I will look into the script once the release is over. > > On Mon,

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-25-ea+15) - Build # 54131 - Unstable!

2025-03-31 Thread Adrien Grand
This test makes assumptions in a few places that deleting docs or adding docs would not trigger merges. This assumption is sometimes broken. I pushed a fix that explicitly configures a NoMergePolicy when no merging is expected. https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/59e992e4f3853c9589f735d24055c4

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-25-ea+15) - Build # 54156 - Still Failing!

2025-03-31 Thread Ignacio Vera
Thanks Dawid! My fault, the script "addVersion.py" didn't apply cleanly in main and I had to manually change things and I forgot to apply tidy at the end. I will look into the script once the release is over. On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:57 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > > I've applied tidy on main. >

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

2025-03-31 Thread Robert Muir
i added some bullets for automaton/regex improvements. On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 9:47 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > I would like to highlight the performance improvements that are coming in > 10.2 in a way that sounds a bit more exciting that our usual bullet points so > I started working on the rel

Re: [Question] What is the `close` contract of sliced IndexInput?

2025-03-31 Thread Michael Froh
Checking a few of the implementations, the general rule seems to be that sliced IndexInput instances don't get closed or the close operation is a no-op. For example, in NIOFSIndexInput, the slice constructor sets isClone to true, which make the close() method a no-op: https://github.com/apache/luc

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-25-ea+15) - Build # 54131 - Unstable!

2025-03-31 Thread Dawid Weiss
Thanks, Adrien. Dawid On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 5:31 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > This test makes assumptions in a few places that deleting docs or adding > docs would not trigger merges. This assumption is sometimes broken. I > pushed a fix that explicitly configures a NoMergePolicy when no merging i