Ok; thanks Anshum.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:40 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> I'm just about to update the website and send out the notification for
> 5.5.3 in a few hours (as soon as I get some time at work). About the
> section, I assume you are talking about the CHANGES.txt file and
Hey David,
I'm just about to update the website and send out the notification for
5.5.3 in a few hours (as soon as I get some time at work). About the
section, I assume you are talking about the CHANGES.txt file and I
should've done that as part of the release process but I think I missed the
5x,
Anhum,
Minutes ago I went and committed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417 to master, branch_6x,
branch_5x, and branch_5_5. While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the
last 5.5.x was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new
5.5.3. That is now committed. Then the r
The release notes (draft) can be found here:
Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553
Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553
Please feel free to edit/fix it.
-Anshum
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley
wrote:
> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high index
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>
>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>>
>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
ow enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>
>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>
>>> http://www.
http://www.thetaphi.de
>>
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
>>
&g
www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
>
>
>
> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0
ust 29, 2016 7:01 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to resume the
5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an RC out on
Wednesday.
-Anshum
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:0
With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to resume
the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an RC out
on Wednesday.
-Anshum
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
>
UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorr
I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
objections.
@Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if it
makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste
wrote:
> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
> On Jul 20, 2016
Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
> to that branch as well.
>
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about
I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
to that branch as well.
Erick
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading to
> unstable state in Solr.
>
> How quickly that state is reached is
As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading to
unstable state in Solr.
How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley
wrote:
> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't
Right, it affects SSL-enabled Solr more quickly. I do not know if it
eventually affects non-SSL Solr, I guess not ...
Also, it's not about high indexing rates, as it's reproduced with 9
docs/sec, IIRC.
Anyway, it certainly affected several users already, so I'm +1 for the
release.
Shai
On Wed,
Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those
using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
bells too loudly :-)
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
Hi,
With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it impacts
all users with high indexing rates.
If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, I'll
be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
--
Anshum Gupta
18 matches
Mail list logo
