Re: Should we separate Panama FFM and Vector classes in Lucene?

2025-10-13 Thread Trevor McCulloch
Agree on waiting for Lucene 11, otherwise it may become very difficult to backport any related features into 10.x. On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 5:58 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > hi, I am on travel at the moment till end of October and won't be able to > look into this. Basically we can move some

Re: Slow tests

2025-10-08 Thread Michael Sokolov
Thanks for bumping this up Dawid! I pushed a fix for TestBPReorderingMergePolicy On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 5:03 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > > Hello everyone! > > In short: the tests have become slow. This happens, gradually - nothing new. > But we should do a shakedown of the most terrible offenders

Re: Exploring Telemetry for Lucene

2025-10-07 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > > IMO Lucene should just be a library with ~no dependencies. It just : > needs to expose the right callbacks to allow for easy observability higher : > up the stack. : > ++ This makes sense to me. I’d rather make telemetry more straightforward : > to capture, rather than try to capture it.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-03 Thread Kaival Parikh
SUCCESS! [0:54:51.216090] +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 11:28 AM Benjamin Trent wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.3.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.3.1-RC1-rev-51190f35a16d2ce433139abfe0fd

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-03 Thread Trevor McCulloch
+1 SUCCESS! [0:30:27.316346] On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 7:34 AM Stefan Vodita wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:44:50.175302] > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 16:28, Benjamin Trent wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.3.1 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> https://dist.apache

Re: Exploring Telemetry for Lucene

2025-10-03 Thread Trevor McCulloch
On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 7:37 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > > On 3 Oct 2025, at 14:37, David Smiley wrote: > > > > IMO Lucene should just be a library with ~no dependencies. It just > needs to expose the right callbacks to allow for easy observability higher > up the stack. > > ++ This makes

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-03 Thread Stefan Vodita
+1 SUCCESS! [0:44:50.175302] On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 16:28, Benjamin Trent wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.3.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.3.1-RC1-rev-51190f35a16d2ce433139abfe0fd8365791b352a > > Y

Re: Exploring Telemetry for Lucene

2025-10-03 Thread Chris Hegarty
Hi, > On 3 Oct 2025, at 14:37, David Smiley wrote: > > IMO Lucene should just be a library with ~no dependencies. It just needs to > expose the right callbacks to allow for easy observability higher up the > stack. ++ This makes sense to me. I’d rather make telemetry more straightforward to

Re: Exploring Telemetry for Lucene

2025-10-03 Thread David Smiley
IMO Lucene should just be a library with ~no dependencies. It just needs to expose the right callbacks to allow for easy observability higher up the stack. Today I was looking at Solr's hooks into Lucene on this topic. SolrIndexWriter overrides a protected method doAfterFlush allowing Solr to inc

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-03 Thread Chris Hegarty
SUCCESS! [1:31:42.691749] +1 -Chris. > On 2 Oct 2025, at 16:18, Benjamin Trent wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.3.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.3.1-RC1-rev-51190f35a16d2ce433139abfe0fd8365791b3

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-03 Thread Dawid Weiss
SUCCESS! [0:51:02.384941] +1. On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 5:36 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.3.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.3.1-RC1-rev-51190f35a16d2ce433139abfe0fd8365791b352a >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-03 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I ran Smoketester with Java 21, 22, 23, 24 (25 is not possible due to Gradle) on Policeman Jenkins: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/11/console => SUCCESS! [1:49:24.621696] Changes look fine my manual checks for 10.3 still apply. +1 to release! Uwe Am 02.10.2

Re: Add matomo analytics for Lucene?

2025-10-02 Thread Dawid Weiss
Sure, why not - thank you. On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 10:51 PM Pablo Estrada wrote: > > Hello folks! > I noticed that Lucene is not hooked up to the ASF-provided analytics platform > matomo[1]. I was wondering if it might be valuable to add the Lucene site to > it - it would help understand the com

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-02 Thread Ignacio Vera
SUCCESS! [1:18:05.233087] +1 On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 12:36 AM Ankit Jain wrote: > SUCCESS! [1:13:37.279630] > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 10:00 AM Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> SUCCESS! [0:46:52.912248] >> >> +1 >> >> Thanks Ben! >> >> On 2 Oct 2025, at 16:18, Benjamin Trent w

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-02 Thread Ankit Jain
SUCCESS! [1:13:37.279630] +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 10:00 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > SUCCESS! [0:46:52.912248] > > +1 > > Thanks Ben! > > On 2 Oct 2025, at 16:18, Benjamin Trent wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.3.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded fr

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.1 RC1

2025-10-02 Thread Alan Woodward
SUCCESS! [0:46:52.912248] +1 Thanks Ben! > On 2 Oct 2025, at 16:18, Benjamin Trent wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.3.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.3.1-RC1-rev-51190f35a16d2ce433139abfe0fd83657

Re: Weird release failure

2025-10-02 Thread Chris Hegarty
der) has values like "21.0.2" > > FWIW: On main the smoketester was updated to use a regex for checking > X-Build-JDK, expecting either a '.' or a ' ' character to follow the > BASE_JAVA_VERSION. > > > > : Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 18:43:04 -04

Re: Weird release failure

2025-10-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
ted to use a regex for checking X-Build-JDK, expecting either a '.' or a ' ' character to follow the BASE_JAVA_VERSION. : Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 18:43:04 -0400 : From: Robert Muir : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: dev@lucene.apache.org : Subject: Re: Weird release fa

Re: Weird release failure

2025-10-01 Thread Robert Muir
Looks like a bug in the smoketester. Removing the "." (period) in the check should fix it: - "X-Build-JDK: %s." % BASE_JAVA_VERSION, + "X-Build-JDK: %s" % BASE_JAVA_VERSION, On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 6:03 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > > Hey y'all, > > It's been awhile since I have done a rel

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-10-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
A belated welcome from me to Trevor. His committer-ship means a lot to me, and the Atlas Search team at MDB. There's a lot of deep, production-heavy, diverse challenges going on here and Trevor and team are in the thick of it, and glad to see Lucene benefit from his skills. Erik On Wed, Sep 1

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-MMAPv2-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-26-ea+17) - Build # 2673 - Failure!

2025-09-30 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi LOL: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-MMAPv2-Windows/2673/console Thanks Dawid for restoring main branch! Am 30.09.2025 um 17:05 schrieb Policeman Jenkins Server: Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-MMAPv2-Windows/2673/ Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-26-ea+17 -XX:+UseCompressedOops

Re: (lucene) branch main updated: Fix smoke tester test workflow to run with Java 25 (#15260)

2025-09-30 Thread Uwe Schindler
Dawid, this commit is missing on Github. Uwe Am 30.09.2025 um 09:05 schrieb dwe...@apache.org: This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. dweiss pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene.git The following commit(s) were

Re: Deleted the last week of commits in main

2025-09-30 Thread Ignacio Vera
THe branch has been recovered thanks to Dawid, thank you! On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 5:10 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Ignacio Vera > 5:05 PM (4 minutes ago) > to private > Sorry folks, > > I was working on something and I screwed up my windows and I ended up > pushing into main a commit that is missi

Re: Deleted the last week of commits in main

2025-09-30 Thread Dawid Weiss
> (we still need to confirm if the wildcards work but these branches should > be safe). > Wildcards don't work but I added all the branch_* branches manually. > Folks, you might see "git pull" fail with a fatal, due to remote branch > being overwritten. > So it's caused by the fact that I manua

Re: Deleted the last week of commits in main

2025-09-30 Thread Vigya Sharma
Thank you Dawid, for fixing this promptly. And also adding protection against force_push for main and branch_10x (we still need to confirm if the wildcards work but these branches should be safe). Folks, you might see "git pull" fail with a fatal, due

Re: Deleted the last week of commits in main

2025-09-30 Thread Dawid Weiss
This has been fixed already, no worries. Dawid On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 5:33 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Ignacio Vera > 5:05 PM (4 minutes ago) > to private > Sorry folks, > > I was working on something and I screwed up my windows and I ended up > pushing into main a commit that is missing the las

Re: (lucene) branch main updated: Fix smoke tester test workflow to run with Java 25 (#15260)

2025-09-30 Thread Dawid Weiss
I'll reapply it separately, no problem. On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 5:49 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Dawid, > > this commit is missing on Github. > > Uwe > > Am 30.09.2025 um 09:05 schrieb dwe...@apache.org: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > > > dweiss pushed

Re: Heads up: Java 25 required on main

2025-09-29 Thread Chris Hegarty
Awesome!!! Thank you Dawid and Robert for bumping us to Java 25. -Chris. > On 29 Sep 2025, at 11:57, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > Just wanted to explicitly mention this so that you're not caught by surprise > - the main branch moved on to require Java 25 so if you don't have

Re: Heads up: Java 25 required on main

2025-09-29 Thread Uwe Schindler
Awesome! I have a problem: Eclipse config ("./gradlew eclipse") does not work (see issue). Uwe Am 29.09.2025 um 12:57 schrieb Dawid Weiss: Hello everyone, Just wanted to explicitly mention this so that you're not caught by surprise - the main branch moved on to require Java 25 so if you d

Re: Inconsistent randomisation behaviour

2025-09-26 Thread Dawid Weiss
In general, you should try to pass all the parameters that the repro line mentions as these may affect the result. I understand this is problematic if you want to re-launch from intellij, in which case I'd suggest two options - 1) run the test in intellij via gradle, setting all the options

Re: Inconsistent randomisation behaviour

2025-09-25 Thread Alan Woodward
Aha, yes, I need to set -Ptests.nightly=true as it changes the behaviour of `rarely()`. Thanks, this drove me absolutely nuts for about three hours yesterday. > On 24 Sep 2025, at 16:23, Michael Sokolov wrote: > > did you also set the other test parameters like -Ptests.nightly=true ? > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC2

2025-09-25 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I ran the smoke tests with Policeman Jenkins, here's the result: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-Release-Tester/43/consoleFull SUCCESS! [2:56:54.397566] 😉 Smoke tester checked the following JDKs (this explains runtime): * Java 11 JAVA_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/64bit/hotspo

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC2

2025-09-24 Thread Benjamin Trent
SUCCESS! [0:48:46.455533] +1 On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 4:32 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > SUCCESS! [1:01:55.136848] > > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:14 PM Ankit Jain wrote: > > > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.12.3 > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC2

2025-09-24 Thread Michael Sokolov
SUCCESS! [1:01:55.136848] +1 On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:14 PM Ankit Jain wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.12.3 > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.12.3-RC2-rev-f965e930673c1f5cb478dc6a8907f5fc4ef7b539 >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, several Linux, macos and Windows builds with various jdk versions up to 25 and 26-ea succeeded now. Uwe Am 24.09.2025 um 11:19 schrieb Uwe Schindler: It was fixed. The new 2-arg nextInt() method was not available in Java 11. I just changed to add 2 to have a lower bound. Uwe Am 24.0

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-24 Thread Ankit Jain
Thanks Uwe for a prompt fix. I could successfully rebuild and smoke test the artifacts. Test Maven artifacts... download artifacts .

Re: Inconsistent randomisation behaviour

2025-09-24 Thread Michael Sokolov
did you also set the other test parameters like -Ptests.nightly=true ? On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 7:01 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’m seeing some strange behaviour trying to reproduce a test failure in > IntelliJ, compared to what happens when I run the test on the command line > via

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-24 Thread Ankit Jain
Thanks Ignacio! This vote is officially void now, will respin and send out another vote. It will have following additional fixes: 1. Support for JDK24+ 2. Fix failure due to hole bridge being coplanar with polygon edge 3. Fix mock filesystem WindowsFS to also work on Windows. This is

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
It was fixed. The new 2-arg nextInt() method was not available in Java 11. I just changed to add 2 to have a lower bound. Uwe Am 24.09.2025 um 11:04 schrieb Uwe Schindler: I will fix this, sorry. The backport calls a method not available in earlier JDK. Will fix in a moment, i did not run

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
I will fix this, sorry. The backport calls a method not available in earlier JDK. Will fix in a moment, i did not run tests after cherry-picking! Uwe Am 24.09.2025 um 09:40 schrieb Ankit Jain: Thanks Uwe for backporting the change. While building RC2, saw some issues while running ./gradle

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-24 Thread Ankit Jain
Thanks Uwe for backporting the change. While building RC2, saw some issues while running ./gradlew --no-daemon -Dtests.badapples=false clean check is failing with below error: *> Task :lucene:test-framework:compileTestJava* /local/home/akjain/ws/lucene/lucene/test-framework/src/test/org/apach

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I just backported the other one, too. The Changes entry is now also available. Uwe Am 24.09.2025 um 08:55 schrieb Uwe Schindler: Hi, https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14706 only fixes a random bug which is caused by an incorrectly generated filename which is assumed to be "incorr

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14706 only fixes a random bug which is caused by an incorrectly generated filename which is assumed to be "incorrect" but it isn't on a real windows. So yes, after 14627 it should be green most of the time, but accasionally fails du to this: // We ne

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-23 Thread Ankit Jain
Okay, never mind. The build seems to be green after cherry-picking https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14627 to 9.12 branch. So that is the only change we need it seems. - Ankit

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-23 Thread Ignacio Vera
Thank you Ankit! I have backported the fix now. On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 9:36 PM Ankit Jain wrote: > Since the regression was introduced in bug fix release, we can consider > taking it as part of bug fix release. I tried cherry-picking the commit, > but ran into some conflicts. > Let me know once

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-23 Thread Ankit Jain
Hi Uwe, I can pick up this change for 9.12 RC2 build. I am wondering if we also need https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14706 in addition to https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14627 for addressing this issue? - Ankit On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:30 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > this o

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-23 Thread Ankit Jain
Since the regression was introduced in bug fix release, we can consider taking it as part of bug fix release. I tried cherry-picking the commit, but ran into some conflicts. Let me know once you finish backporting this commit. On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 2:46 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Hello Ankit, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-23 Thread Ignacio Vera
Hello Ankit, I have just fixed a regression in a lucene component that is used for indexing polygons using lucene that was introduced in lucene 9.12.1. If you are generating a RC2 I wonder if it would be ok for you if I backport the fix

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-23 Thread Ankit Jain
Thanks Chris and Uwe. I have backported the change for disabling the security manager to 9.12 branch. I can generate RC2 with this change included and send out another vote, unless I am missing something.

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.12-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.6) - Build # 662 - Unstable!

2025-09-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, this one is not critical for the release; it is caused by Windows 11 instead of Windows 10 on the Policeman Jenkins WIndows machine. The test is buggy as something has changed in Windows 11: GITHUB#14627, GITHUB#11920: Fix mock filesystem WindowsFS to also work on Windows.  This is requir

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-22 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, The problem was not Smoketester, it was found by normal 9.12 Jenkins run (as Smoketester cannot handle builds where Gradle does not support the Java version): https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.12-Linux/2549/console Uwe Am 22.09.2025 um 20:45 schrieb Uwe Schindler: Hi Chris, Y

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-22 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Chris, Yes only the security manager should not be enabled. Everything else is not a problem. Of course I could reconfigure Jenkins to pass the system property for java 24+, but I hope we can fix the build. Mike S.: the security manager error does not happen in smoke tester as it can't han

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-22 Thread Chris Hegarty
Uwe, Thanks for checking with the different JDKs. > IMHO, we should not release something that's not well tested with Java 24 or > Java 25, so I'd suggest to backport the "SecurityManager disablement" from > 10.x to 9.12 branch! We should also fix the smoke tester to allow running > with Java

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-22 Thread Michael Sokolov
Thanks for explaining, Uwe. I noticed tests did not run, but I didn't see the error you found - I wonder, does smoketester print it out for you, or did you find the error in a log somewhere? On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 5:19 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > First of all, it passed for me on Policem

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.3 RC1

2025-09-22 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, First of all, it passed for me on Policeman Jenkins: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-Release-Tester/41/console SUCCESS! [3:01:57.643572] This was checked for the following JDKs: Java 11 JAVA_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/64bit/hotspot/latest-jdk11 Java 17 JAVA_HOME=/home/jenki

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-MMAPv2-macOS (64bit/hotspot/jdk-24.0.1) - Build # 729 - Still Failing!

2025-09-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
Sorry for the short outtakes. macOS VM was updated to macOs 26 (Tahoe). All should work now, will do a final reboot to delete the snapshot taken before installation (not possible live with KVM/libvirt when EFI is used for booting). Uwe Am 20.09.2025 um 18:08 schrieb Policeman Jenkins Server:

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-19 Thread Michael Sokolov
Hello Trevor! On Fri, Sep 19, 2025, 12:31 AM Vigya Sharma wrote: > Congratulations Trevor! Welcome! > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 6:45 PM Ankit Jain wrote: > >> Congratulations Trevor! >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 6:36 PM 张超 wrote: >> >>> Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! >>> >>> On Sep 1

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Vigya Sharma
Congratulations Ramakrishna! Welcome! On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 6:46 PM Ankit Jain wrote: > Congratulations Ramakrishna! > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 6:33 PM 张超 wrote: > >> Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna! >> >> > On Sep 19, 2025, at 03:27, Michael Sokolov wrote: >> > >> > Felicitations

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Vigya Sharma
Congratulations Trevor! Welcome! On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 6:45 PM Ankit Jain wrote: > Congratulations Trevor! > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 6:36 PM 张超 wrote: > >> Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! >> >> On Sep 19, 2025, at 02:25, Michael Froh wrote: >> >> Welcome Trevor! Congratulations! >>

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Ankit Jain
Congratulations Ramakrishna! On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 6:33 PM 张超 wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna! > > > On Sep 19, 2025, at 03:27, Michael Sokolov wrote: > > > > Felicitations and Salutations, Ramakrishna! > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 2:27 PM Michael Froh wrote: > >> > >> C

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Ankit Jain
Congratulations Trevor! On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 6:36 PM 张超 wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! > > On Sep 19, 2025, at 02:25, Michael Froh wrote: > > Welcome Trevor! Congratulations! > > Froh > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 7:39 AM Marcus Eagan > wrote: > >> Congrats and welcome Trevor!

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread 张超
Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! > On Sep 19, 2025, at 02:25, Michael Froh wrote: > > Welcome Trevor! Congratulations! > > Froh > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 7:39 AM Marcus Eagan > wrote: >> Congrats and welcome Trevor! It's a big step forward in Lucene open so

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread 张超
Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna! > On Sep 19, 2025, at 03:27, Michael Sokolov wrote: > > Felicitations and Salutations, Ramakrishna! > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 2:27 PM Michael Froh wrote: >> >> Congratulations Ramakrishna! Welcome aboard! >> >> Froh >> >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Michael Sokolov
Felicitations and Salutations, Ramakrishna! On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 2:27 PM Michael Froh wrote: > > Congratulations Ramakrishna! Welcome aboard! > > Froh > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 7:31 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: >> >> Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna! >> >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03 PM

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-main-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-26-ea+10) - Build # 16867 - Failure!

2025-09-18 Thread Dawid Weiss
I've reverted this PR and will see why it fails on Windows. https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15200 On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 8:14 PM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Windows/16867/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-26-ea+10 -X

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-18 Thread Dawid Weiss
> To speed up tests while building the RC, you can increase parallelism by > adding the following settings to your *~/lucene.build.properties* > Not sure if this still works no 10x or main (I don't think it will). D.

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-18 Thread Ankit Jain
Okay, I reran the smoke tests using releaseWizard after following this suggestion from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseTodo. To speed up tests while building the RC, you can increase parallelism by adding the following settings to your *~/lucene.build.properties* tests.j

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Michael Froh
Welcome Trevor! Congratulations! Froh On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 7:39 AM Marcus Eagan wrote: > Congrats and welcome Trevor! It's a big step forward in Lucene open source > investment. > > Marcus > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 7:32 AM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! >>

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Michael Froh
Congratulations Ramakrishna! Welcome aboard! Froh On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 7:31 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna! > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'm pleased to announce that Ramakrishna Chilaka has accepted th

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-18 Thread Michael Sokolov
I ran that command ... and it finished SUCCESS! [0:07:40.669238] without ever running any tests at all? On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 3:49 AM Ankit Jain wrote: > > I was planning to send a VOTE email today, but was unable to get smoke tests > to pass. During smoke test run from the release wizard, onl

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Marcus Eagan
Congrats and welcome Trevor! It's a big step forward in Lucene open source investment. Marcus On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 7:32 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'm pleased to announce t

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Anshum Gupta
Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm pleased to announce that Trevor McCulloch has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer! > > Trevor, it is a tradition that new committers introduce themselves with a >

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Anshum Gupta
Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna! On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm pleased to announce that Ramakrishna Chilaka has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer! > > Ramakrishna, it is a tradition that new committers introduce themse

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Chris Hegarty
Congrats Ramakrishna! Excited to see your contributions as a new Lucene committer!” -Chris > On 18 Sep 2025, at 08:41, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna! > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 9:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'm pleased to announc

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Chris Hegarty
Kudos Trevor! Thrilled to have you join the Lucene committers family. -Chris. > On 18 Sep 2025, at 08:41, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 9:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'm pleased to announce that Trevor McCul

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Dawid Weiss
Congratulations and welcome, Trevor! On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 9:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm pleased to announce that Trevor McCulloch has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer! > > Trevor, it is a tradition that new committers introduce themselves with a

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-18 Thread Ankit Jain
I was planning to send a VOTE email today, but was unable to get smoke tests to pass. During smoke test run from the release wizard, only TestTieredMergePolicy was failing which seems flaky - https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13667#issuecomment-3305466611 Hence, I staged the artifacts and ran

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Dawid Weiss
Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna! On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 9:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm pleased to announce that Ramakrishna Chilaka has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer! > > Ramakrishna, it is a tradition that new committers introduce thems

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Luca Cavanna
Congratulations and welcome! On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 9:19 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > Welcome Ramakrishna! > > On 17 Sep 2025, at 20:29, Chilaka Ramakrishna > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Thank you for the warm welcome! > > I’m Ramakrishna Chilaka, based in Bangalore, India, and I work with the >

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Luca Cavanna
Congrats and welcome! On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 9:19 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > Welcome Trevor! > > On 17 Sep 2025, at 22:03, Trevor McCulloch > wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I'm Trevor and I work at MongoDB on the Atlas Search product, which is > powered by Lucene, but I've been working on scale s

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Alan Woodward
Welcome Ramakrishna! > On 17 Sep 2025, at 20:29, Chilaka Ramakrishna wrote: > > Hi everyone, > Thank you for the warm welcome! > > I’m Ramakrishna Chilaka, based in Bangalore, India, and I work with the AWS > OpenSearch team here. Outside of work, I’m an avid reader of history, > especially a

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-18 Thread Alan Woodward
Welcome Trevor! > On 17 Sep 2025, at 22:03, Trevor McCulloch > wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I'm Trevor and I work at MongoDB on the Atlas Search product, which is > powered by Lucene, but I've been working on scale search issues for quite a > while now. I live in the Bay Area, and in my off

Re: Welcome Trevor McCulloch as Lucene committer

2025-09-17 Thread Trevor McCulloch
Hi everybody, I'm Trevor and I work at MongoDB on the Atlas Search product, which is powered by Lucene, but I've been working on scale search issues for quite a while now. I live in the Bay Area, and in my off hours I cook, garden, and spend time with my two young kids. Looking forward to working

Re: Welcome Ramakrishna Chilaka as Lucene committer

2025-09-17 Thread Chilaka Ramakrishna
Hi everyone, Thank you for the warm welcome! I’m Ramakrishna Chilaka, based in Bangalore, India, and I work with the AWS OpenSearch team here. Outside of work, I’m an avid reader of history, especially ancient and colonial India. It’s truly an honor to work with all of you, and I look forward to

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-17 Thread Ankit Jain
Thanks Mike for the reminder. I created a signing gpg key and uploaded the same to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lucene/KEYS. Hopefully that should avoid any key related issues. Will also get my key signed by one of the committers to prevent tests from complaining. I am assuming that t

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-16 Thread Michael Sokolov
Have you gotten a code signing gpg key? That usually seems to cause some delays since the key must be committed to a file in order for the release to go through On Tue, Sep 16, 2025, 3:17 PM Ankit Jain wrote: > Thanks Benjamin and Chris. Will kick off the release process later today > or tomorro

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-16 Thread Ankit Jain
Thanks Benjamin and Chris. Will kick off the release process later today or tomorrow! I can see that all the proposed changes above have already been backported into branch_9_12. Additionally, I see another change Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly (

Re: "good first issue" grooming

2025-09-16 Thread David Smiley
Wonderful idea for next time :-) On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 3:45 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Hey David, > > Thank you for doing this! I don't have good ideas for new good first > issues. > > However, something that we need to periodically do and hasn't been done in > a long time now is taking a look a

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-15 Thread Chris Hegarty
Thanks Ankit, I backported the missing DOAP changes for release 10.2.2 and 10.3.0 [*]. I hope the release goes smoothly! :fingers_crossed: -Chris. [*] https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/d2cf5568e3965cc642cae3b695fcbeff5bb5c2ed > On 15 Sep 2025, at 11:59, Benjamin Trent wrote: > > Anki

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-15 Thread Benjamin Trent
Ankit, You got it :). No push back and folks seem ready for a release. You can start the process as soon as today/tomorrow Good luck! Ben On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 10:22 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Thank you everyone! +1 for a rare N-2 bugfix release. > > Mike M

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-14 Thread Michael McCandless
Thank you everyone! +1 for a rare N-2 bugfix release. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 8:38 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > all fine. It was already backported by Chris. I haven't seen the message, > sorry! > > Uwe > Am 14.09.2025 um 15:33 schrieb Uwe

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-14 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, all fine. It was already backported by Chris. I haven't seen the message, sorry! Uwe Am 14.09.2025 um 15:33 schrieb Uwe Schindler: Hi, I'd like to include the bugfix for the Spinloop bug in the shared Arena grouping. I'll backport that in a moment. Uwe Am 14.09.2025 um 07:41 schrie

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-14 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I'd like to include the bugfix for the Spinloop bug in the shared Arena grouping. I'll backport that in a moment. Uwe Am 14.09.2025 um 07:41 schrieb Ankit Jain: Hi Chris, I would like to volunteer and be RM for the first time. Benjamin made a really good point about using bug fix relea

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-13 Thread Ankit Jain
Hi Chris, I would like to volunteer and be RM for the first time. Benjamin made a really good point about using bug fix release as stepping stone to minor version release. Thanks Ankit On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 7:28 AM Benjamin Trent wrote: > Hey Chris, > > Thank you for this proposal. I agree,

Re: Proposing a 10.3 release in September

2025-09-13 Thread Vigya Sharma
M Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I would treat it as a blocker. I think that there's a good chance that > it gets addressed in the coming week, so hopefully it doesn't delay the > release. Let's discuss options next Friday if it's still not addressed? > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.0 RC2

2025-09-13 Thread Vigya Sharma
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 12 (10 binding) 0 1 -1 0 This vote has PASSED On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 7:53 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 to release RC2 > > Smoke tester on nightly benchy box (beast3) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.0 RC2

2025-09-13 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 to release RC2 Smoke tester on nightly benchy box (beast3) was happy: SUCCESS! [0:33:08.766406] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 5:24 AM Simon Cooper wrote:

Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

2025-09-13 Thread Benjamin Trent
Hey Chris, Thank you for this proposal. I agree, these are pretty critical bug fixes. I can be released manager for this one :). Need to shake my "release manager dust" off. Unless there is someone who REALLY wants the opportunity to do their first time as RM. A big fix release is usually an eas

Re: Proposing a 10.3 release in September

2025-09-13 Thread Chris Hegarty
o hopefully it doesn't delay the >> release. Let's discuss options next Friday if it's still not addressed? >> >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 2:18 AM Vigya Sharma wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm proposing to cut the branch ten days from today

Re: Proposing a 10.3 release in September

2025-09-12 Thread Adrien Grand
I would treat it as a blocker. I think that there's a good chance >>>>>>> that it gets addressed in the coming week, so hopefully it doesn't delay >>>>>>> the release. Let's discuss options next Friday if it's still not >>>>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >