Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

I think I understand the issue now as I asked for gradle sing-in when I shouldn't. Apologies for the noise. On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 3:09 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > If I change the command to : > > ./gradlew --stacktrace --no-daemon assembleRelease > -Dversion.release=10.2.0 -Psign --max-workers 2

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

If I change the command to : ./gradlew --stacktrace --no-daemon assembleRelease -Dversion.release=10.2.0 -Psign --max-workers 2 -PuseGpg -Psigning.gnupg.keyName="" Then it works. I just follow the instructions in "gradlew helpPublishing". Why this needs to change now, it is a mystery to me.

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

Hello, I have been trying to build the artifacts but I am unable to sing them. I have done this before so it used to work for me so I am not sure if something has changed on my setup or something has changed on the build. It fails when running the following command: ./gradlew --stacktrace --no-

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

I have merged and backported the connected components logic for the 10.2.0 release. Thanks y'all! On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 8:50 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > I agree that the downsides are much bigger than the benefits. I have > no strong opinion between reverting the change or disabling it, maybe > f

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

I agree that the downsides are much bigger than the benefits. I have no strong opinion between reverting the change or disabling it, maybe for 10.2 is safer to just disable it. On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 2:28 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > > It makes sense to me. I think it's providing marginal benefi

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

It makes sense to me. I think it's providing marginal benefits, and the downside is bad On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 4:58 AM Benjamin Trent wrote: > Hey y'all, > > Unless there is strong dissenting opinion, I think we should revert the > connected components work in HNSW for 10.2 as a bug fix. > https:/

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

> I am not doing a full revert as the original changes adjusted the APIs in v10 (adding exception declaration, etc.). Actually, the original change was to 9.12 as well. So, I could do a full revert if that is desired. Additionally, it makes me think that we should disable/revert in 9.12 and do a

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

Hey y'all, Unless there is strong dissenting opinion, I think we should revert the connected components work in HNSW for 10.2 as a bug fix. https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14411 We found that when "connectedComponents" is most needed (e.g. a very disconnected graph), it takes an inordinate

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

Hello everyone, We have discovered that a change introduced in 10.2 doesn't work nicely when two fields are indexed with the same analyzer. There is a workaround, but for now I will revert this change for th

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

Hey Tommaso, I have no objections if you can get the PR merged today. Cheers, Ignacio On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:14 PM Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > I'd like to get https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14094 in by tomorrow, > unless anyone objects. > > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 17:15, Robert Muir

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

I'd like to get https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14094 in by tomorrow, unless anyone objects. On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 17:15, Robert Muir wrote: > i added some bullets for automaton/regex improvements. > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 9:47 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I would like to highlight

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

i added some bullets for automaton/regex improvements. On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 9:47 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > I would like to highlight the performance improvements that are coming in > 10.2 in a way that sounds a bit more exciting that our usual bullet points so > I started working on the rel

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

I would like to highlight the performance improvements that are coming in 10.2 in a way that sounds a bit more exciting that our usual bullet points so I started working on the release notes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Releases+Notes+10.2.0 On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:37 PM I

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

Thanks Rob for the heads up. Let's try to improve those scripts for posterity. On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 5:50 PM Robert Muir wrote: > > +1 and I am happy to assist RM with the python scripts situation > (release wizard / smoke tester) > > I am 100% sure I caused some breakage in the scripts by intr

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

+1 and I am happy to assist RM with the python scripts situation (release wizard / smoke tester) I am 100% sure I caused some breakage in the scripts by introducing the linting and type-checking/hints. But I am convinced if we work through the problems (one-time pain), it will make it easier to ma

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

+1 and thanks for volunteering to be the release manager Ignacio! On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 5:34 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 let's get these huge performance improvements out > > Thank you Ignacio > > Le mar. 25 mars 2025, 17:18, Ignacio Vera a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> Lucene 10.1.0 was released 3

Re: Proposing a 10.2.0 release

+1 let's get these huge performance improvements out Thank you Ignacio Le mar. 25 mars 2025, 17:18, Ignacio Vera a écrit : > Hi, > > Lucene 10.1.0 was released 3 months ago and improvements are piling up > so I would like to propose a lucene 10.2.0 release. I am proposing to > cut the branch on

Proposing a 10.2.0 release

Hi, Lucene 10.1.0 was released 3 months ago and improvements are piling up so I would like to propose a lucene 10.2.0 release. I am proposing to cut the branch on Monday next week and build the RC by the end of the week. I am happy to be the release manager for 10.2.0 unless anyone else wants to