RE: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-11-02 Thread Digy
Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Community Status DIGY, I agree in that I am surprised that Lucene PMC has not been following the on-going activity of the project. There has

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-11-02 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Josh Handel wrote: > One thing that has yet to be answered on this list is this : > > What does Apache Foundation provide, that the project does not received on > its own OTHER than the name "Lucene".. I hear a lot of what Apache > requests of us, beyond a name

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-11-02 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Granroth, Neal V. wrote: > Huh? What I should have been clear and concise to anyone who has follow the > project for the past several years. > > Lucene.Net has already been through the official process of being promoted > out of incubator status. Why is it necessa

Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-29 Thread Grant Ingersoll
FYI: This message was sent to the [email protected] list on Oct. 25 and elicited zero replies. I am sending it here in the hopes that some of you will step forward and either bring this project back to life via going back to the Incubator or we put it in the Apache Attic and someone can