Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

Hi Feng, > On 29 Nov 2023, at 11:25, Guo Feng wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Nightly benchmark shows that #12699 gets back some speed. I've backport it to > 9.9.0. I think it is ready now. Awesome! > Sorry for delaying the release! No apology needed. I appreciate your speedy work here. I’ll star

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

Hi Chris, Nightly benchmark shows that #12699 gets back some speed. I've backport it to 9.9.0. I think it is ready now. Sorry for delaying the release! Feng On 2023/11/28 08:32:59 Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi Guo, > > Thanks for the update. > > Let’s push the 9.9.0 branch cut until tomorrow (ra

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

Hi Guo, Thanks for the update. Let’s push the 9.9.0 branch cut until tomorrow (rather than today as previously suggested), which should allow time to determine the outstanding issues you mentioned below. That should be more straightforward all round. New 9.9.0 branch cut 12:00 29th Nov 2023 UT

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

+1, thanks for volunteering Chris! #12699 is merged to main. I plan to backport it to 9.9 if it fixes the performance drop, otherwise revert #12699 and #12631 (the PR introduced regression) and push them to the next version. On 2023/11/21 09:51:43 Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > It's been a wh

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

Thanks Chris for checking. I had been too optimistic for #12180, I'll push it to 9.10. Fingers crossed that #12699 fixes the performance drop. Le lun. 27 nov. 2023, 07:17, Chris Hegarty a écrit : > Hi Adrien, > > Comments inline. > > On 21 Nov 2023, at 12:31, Adrien Grand wrote: > > +1 9.9 h

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

Hi Adrien, Comments inline. > On 21 Nov 2023, at 12:31, Adrien Grand wrote: > > +1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a RM, > Chris. > > It would be good to try and fix the PKLookup regression that was introduced > since 9.8: http://people.apache.org/~mikemcca

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

+1 to a 9.9.0 release, thanks for volunteering. And also positive to immediately start planning the 10.0 release. JDK bump -> 17 is a major "feature" in itself, so we can bump main branch to 21 too. And discontinue support for 8.x after the 8.11.3 release. Jan > 22. nov. 2023 kl. 17:11 skrev M

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

+1 thanks for volunteering! Hijacking the thread a bit, sorry, I started looking into whether this is a good time to start looking ahead to 10? I know we had some rumblings about releasing that so we can start requiring newer JDKs. But looking at CHANGES it feels like we already back-ported most o

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

+1, thank you Chris! On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, 06:49 Benjamin Trent wrote: > +1 9.9 will be a stellar release! > > Thank you Chris! > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a >> RM, Chris. >> >> It would be go

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

+1 9.9 will be a stellar release! Thank you Chris! On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a > RM, Chris. > > It would be good to try and fix the PKLookup regression that was > introduced since 9.8: > http://peo

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

+1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a RM, Chris. It would be good to try and fix the PKLookup regression that was introduced since 9.8: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/PKLookup.html. Is it just about getting #12699

Re: Lucene 9.9.0 Release

+1 Thank you for volunteering as RC Chris! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 4:52 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > It's been a while since the 9.8.0 release and we’ve accumulated quite a > few changes. I’d like to propose that we release 9.9.0. > > If th

Lucene 9.9.0 Release

Hi, It's been a while since the 9.8.0 release and we’ve accumulated quite a few changes. I’d like to propose that we release 9.9.0. If there's no objections, I volunteer to be the release manager and will cut the feature branch a week from now, 12:00 28th Nov UTC. -Chris. -