Hi,
> On 4 Oct 2024, at 16:08, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> ...
>
> I just re-checked, and branch_9x has nothing in it that is not already in
> branch_9_12.
>
> I’ll delete branch_9x tomorrow, if there are not objections.
Deleted.
-Chris.
Hi,
> On 4 Oct 2024, at 14:03, Luca Cavanna wrote:
>
> Good point Chris, I've seen some confusion as well around the topic.
>
> On branch_9x, shall we remove the branch to prevent further confusion?
I just re-checked, and branch_9x has nothing in it that is not already in
branch_9_12.
I’ll
Good point Chris, I've seen some confusion as well around the topic.
On branch_9x, shall we remove the branch to prevent further confusion?
Cheers
Luca
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:57 PM Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since we bumped and stabilised the main branch to 11, and also cut the
> branche
Hi,
Since we bumped and stabilised the main branch to 11, and also cut the branches
for 10, we can now merge changes into main as usual, and backport to
`branch_10x`.
The last scheduled minor release in the 9 series is 9.12.0. However, the
`branch_9_12` can be used for bug fixing, if at all.
