Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-21 Thread Varun Thacker
There are a couple of more 404 cases caused by missing png files namely: /images/home-wrapper.png , /images/footer.png from http://lucene.apache.org/core/ and /images/quote.jpg from http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ I'm not sure on this but because of the missing footer.png this might me happening -

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I get 404 in both cases (with and without trailing slash). There are also links with /java/index.html this should be fixed .. the redirect to deal with the versioned docs broke the simple case of just "/java" -Hoss - To un

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 6:00 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] New Website Oh, it only works with a trailing slash – without it, I get a 404 From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subje

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
he.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] New Website ? When I follow the link, the redirect works for me (-> core/ I mean) From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website Ugh, where did our re

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Steven A Rowe
Oh, it only works with a trailing slash – without it, I get a 404 From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website Ugh, where did our redirect go? On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Mark Miller

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Steven A Rowe
? When I follow the link, the redirect works for me (-> core/ I mean) From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website Ugh, where did our redirect go? On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Mark Mil

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Ugh, where did our redirect go? On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > Hmm...just noticed that the first hit when you google lucene is > http://lucene.apache.org/java/ > > But that no longer points anywhere... (404). > > Perhaps we should try and plug in a redirect or something? > >

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Miller
Hmm...just noticed that the first hit when you google lucene is http://lucene.apache.org/java/ But that no longer points anywhere... (404). Perhaps we should try and plug in a redirect or something? - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com -

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:11 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) wrote: > Grant; did you miss my JIRA issue to add the book info? > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3096 I missed that. Feel free to fix once you get your account, as my week is booked solid and the amount of time I have for updat

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Michael McCandless
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > thanks for all the work grant! +1, thanks Grant! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For addition

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Simon Willnauer
l.dosc...@lucidimagination.com > www.lucidimagination.com > > From: Grant Ingersoll > Reply-To: > Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:46:08 -0500 > > To: > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website > > We are now live! > > http://lucene.apache.org/ > > > > On Feb 2, 2012

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Doscher
: [DISCUSS] New Website We are now live! http://lucene.apache.org/ On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. > Time for me to do other things until this weekend when I'm going to cut over, >

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
; http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:37 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website On Feb 6, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : We are now live! : :

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
Grant; did you miss my JIRA issue to add the book info? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3096 ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-New-Website

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Joe Cabrera
On 02/06/2012 07:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: On Feb 6, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : We are now live! : : http://lucene.apache.org/ FYI: Grant had put in a redirect for dealing with the /java/ -> /core/ directory change, but forgot that a bunch of page names and urls had chang

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 6, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : We are now live! > : > : http://lucene.apache.org/ > > FYI: Grant had put in a redirect for dealing with the /java/ -> /core/ > directory change, but forgot that a bunch of page names and urls had > changed slightly as well. > > as yo

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Chris Hostetter
: We are now live! : : http://lucene.apache.org/ FYI: Grant had put in a redirect for dealing with the /java/ -> /core/ directory change, but forgot that a bunch of page names and urls had changed slightly as well. as you have probably noticed based on all the commits, i scrambled to try and

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll
We are now live! http://lucene.apache.org/ On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. > Time for me to do other things until this weekend when I'm going to cut over, > so if you have stuff you don't like b

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll
FYI: Forrest to Markdown: http://forrest.apache.org/pluginDocs/plugins_0_80/org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.Markdown/ -Grant On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. > Time for me to do other things until

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-02 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. Time for me to do other things until this weekend when I'm going to cut over, so if you have stuff you don't like before we cut over, see instructions below. This weekend, I will bring in the old versioned docs as well

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-02 Thread David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
t contstitutes a "resource" seems a little dubious / arbitrary, but I do think books definitely belong here. ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-New-Websit

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I pushed some changes. On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : Working on it. Note, Markdown allows for the regular use of HTML: > : http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#html > > right ... hence my question of how we *want* to fix it, given that we have > a lot

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Working on it. Note, Markdown allows for the regular use of HTML: : http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#html right ... hence my question of how we *want* to fix it, given that we have a lot more options for doing things in markdown then we had with forrest ... we almost need

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Dawid Weiss
Time to buy this as your monitor, Erick: http://www.gizmag.com/go/6704/ :) Dawid On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Ahem! Are we talking "over 40 fonts" here? It's a sad fact that I've > been noticing > over the last few years that the screen is getting harder to read... Li

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Erick Erickson
Ahem! Are we talking "over 40 fonts" here? It's a sad fact that I've been noticing over the last few years that the screen is getting harder to read... Living long enough to have that problem beats the alternative though... Erick On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > On Feb

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Will try to address it. Patches welcome ;-) Busy brushing off my CSS skills... On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > >> the text I see (tried 3 browsers) is a bit Gray (or faded), and I rather >> read a page with more contras

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Walter Underwood
On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > the text I see (tried 3 browsers) is a bit Gray (or faded), and I rather read > a page with more contrast between the text and the background, more clear to > my eyes this way, but this is just my personal preference, it seems others do > not fee

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 1, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Chris Hostetter > wrote: >> >> : So, I'd suggest everyone give it a pass through, fix items as they see >> : them and/or otherwise pitch in and help, because I'm tired of our >> : current site and how poor it mak

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : So, I'd suggest everyone give it a pass through, fix items as they see > : them and/or otherwise pitch in and help, because I'm tired of our > : current site and how poor it makes us look. > > Grant: my one concern is how the Solr tutor

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
OK, will see what I can do. On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Doron Cohen wrote: > HI Grant, >> PS I guess it is me to blame not the new site - that somewhat grayed-out >> text is harder to read - but there are many modern sites like this so will

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
ah, yes, the favicon. Easily fixable. Not sure if Lucene has a favicon. On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: >> - Page icon (shown in the address bar) is that of Solr - should be that of >> Lucene. > ? > > I meant this little icon: (hope it will show in the email to the list, if not

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Doron Cohen
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Doron Cohen wrote: > HI Grant, > >> PS I guess it is me to blame not the new site - that somewhat grayed-out >> text is harder to read - but there are many modern sites like this so will >> have to learn to live with it. >> >> >> Clarification please? >> >> > I wis

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Doron Cohen
> > - Page icon (shown in the address bar) is that of Solr - should be that of >> Lucene. >> >> ? >> > > I meant this little icon: (hope it will show in the email to the list, if > not I can send you privately). > That icon comes from here: http://lucene.staging.apache.org/images/favicon.ico

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Doron Cohen
HI Grant, > - Page icon (shown in the address bar) is that of Solr - should be that of > Lucene. > > ? > I meant this little icon: (hope it will show in the email to the list, if not I can send you privately). [image: image.png] > PS I guess it is me to blame not the new site - that somewhat gr

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:32 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > Wow this is impressive! > > so I'd like to propose we make the leap and switch. > > + 1 > > The new site is almost dead simple to edit: > ... > The whole process is 1000x easier than Forrest. You can even edit via the > web using a WYSWIG e

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 to cut over now and iterate after that... great work Grant! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > As many of you know, I've been doing a slow burn on switching us over to the > new ASF CMS.  I'm finally at a point where I thi

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Doron Cohen
Wow this is impressive! > so I'd like to propose we make the leap and switch. > + 1 The new site is almost dead simple to edit: > ... > The whole process is 1000x easier than Forrest. You can even edit via the > web using a WYSWIG editor if you so desire. > This by itself is a major reason to

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Grant Ingersoll >To: dev@lucene.apache.org >Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:12 PM >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website > > > > >On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > >+1, looks much more inviting for everyone! Great work. >> >> >>Minors: &g

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1, looks much more inviting for everyone! Great work. > > Minors: > * Enlarge the search box so the full text "Search with Apache Solr..." is > visible. Hey, it's the home page of the world's best search engine, search > should be prominent -

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
: inline code quoting. we should probably change most of the "code" css to : use the "pre > code" since that's what the markdown docs i'm looking at : say markdown generates for code blocks. ... : ...that looks like a content problem. we seem to be using "" as : the markup for our code

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
Reading up a bit on markdown, and poking arround the generated html and the css we are using i *think* (assuming i understand everything correctly) we have two problems... : places where there should be inlined 'code' in a fixed width : font, ie... ...this looks like CSS problem. Our CSS is

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Jan Høydahl
+1, looks much more inviting for everyone! Great work. Minors: * Enlarge the search box so the full text "Search with Apache Solr..." is visible. Hey, it's the home page of the world's best search engine, search should be prominent - so why not make the search box muuuch wider and add AutoCompl

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
: So, I'd suggest everyone give it a pass through, fix items as they see : them and/or otherwise pitch in and help, because I'm tired of our : current site and how poor it makes us look. Grant: my one concern is how the Solr tutorial currently looks, particularly related to inline code and bul

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I will miss the forresting, but this is fantastic. Now we can take a chainsaw > and kill the forest. > > On the news pages the latest items are still missing (it ends with the Java7 > disasters). Yeah, they need to be updated. Might be a go

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Tommaso Teofili
2012/1/31 Robert Muir > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller > wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > > >> I'd like to switch to the new sites over this weekend or early next > week at the latest > > > > +1 - Thanks for all of you effort on this! > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Dawid Weiss
> I think we should just try to do a hard cutover to the new site. The > old one looks like a 1990s geocities website and almost discourages > you from maintaining it in any way. I would drop the *almost* from the above... +1 for the new layout. Dawid ---

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Uwe Schindler
I will miss the forresting, but this is fantastic. Now we can take a chainsaw and kill the forest. On the news pages the latest items are still missing (it ends with the Java7 disasters). +1 Uwe -- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de Robert Muir schrieb:

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Robert Muir
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >>  I'd like to switch to the new sites over this weekend or early next week at >> the latest > > +1 - Thanks for all of you effort on this! > +1 from me too. To repeat what I told Gran

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Erick Erickson
If you had the faintest clue how very poor my web design skills are, you'd understand that I'd never stand in the way of an effort like this. Go for it! Erick On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >>  I'd like to switch to

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Mark Miller
On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > I'd like to switch to the new sites over this weekend or early next week at > the latest +1 - Thanks for all of you effort on this! - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com ---

[DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Grant Ingersoll
As many of you know, I've been doing a slow burn on switching us over to the new ASF CMS. I'm finally at a point where I think we are ready, for the most part, so I'd like to propose we make the leap and switch. I finally had time to figure out a workaround for INFRA-3850 and have released the