SUCCESS! [1:15:56.228143]
+1
Thanks!
Sanne
On 20 October 2017 at 16:28, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 5.5.5
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-so
Github user Sanne closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/263
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Github user Sanne commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/263
Thanks @sarowe ! closing
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev
GitHub user Sanne opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/263
Backporting of SOLR-11477 on branch_5_5
This is an adaptation of last weeks' security fix SOLR-11477 by (Michael
Stepankin, Olga Barinova, Uwe Schindler, Christine Poerschke)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15752649#comment-15752649
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-6989:
-
We have more recent release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15748715#comment-15748715
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-6989:
-
Thanks Uwe for accurately kee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15659554#comment-15659554
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-6989:
-
Hi all, is there an update on thi
+1
[from the Hibernate Search integration testsuite]
On 22 June 2016 at 06:35, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [2:19:37.075305]
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 5.5.2
>>
>> The artifacts can be downl
That's great, congratulations!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177928#comment-15177928
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-7058:
-
Great, that's very handy! T
Since the release had passed, could we please get further fixes in
further micro versions?
I'm looking forward for Lucene 5.3.2 for the other fixes it brings already.
On 15 January 2016 at 17:03, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>> Anshum:
>>
>> I
lost, and start over.
So when reading the tutorials and references, don't be afraid to type
commands and check the results.
Thanks,
Sanne
On 11 January 2016 at 09:33, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> All discussion in the Github PR is captured in JIRA if the two are linked,
> see https://issues.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15027261#comment-15027261
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-6909:
-
Thanks!
> Improve concurre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15026929#comment-15026929
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-6909:
-
Hi [~mikemccand]! Thanks for chec
Thanks Erick!
It's done, it was as trivial as deleting a single word:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6909
Sanne
On 24 November 2015 at 18:10, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Sanne:
>
> Sure, please open a JIRA and add a patch. You'll need to create a user
> ID o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sanne Grinovero updated LUCENE-6909:
Attachment: 0001-LUCENE-6909-Allow-efficient-concurrent-usage-of-a-Fa.patch
Trivial patch
Sanne Grinovero created LUCENE-6909:
---
Summary: Improve concurrency for FacetsConfig
Key: LUCENE-6909
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6909
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
a patch for that?
As a second step, I'd also like to see if the build method could be
short-circuited for a quick return: in case there are no faceted
fields would be great to just return with the input document right
away.
Thanks,
Sanne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14608407#comment-14608407
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-6212:
-
Hi Adrien, thanks for replying!
Y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14608156#comment-14608156
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-6212:
-
Hello,
I understand there are
Congratulations Anshum!
Regards,
Sanne
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14291720#comment-14291720
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-5569:
-
As a heavy Lucene consumer I prob
rsions on much older JVMs, often supported JVM builds by
other vendors, and I don't expect this to change.
HTH
-- Sanne
On 12 September 2014 20:31, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : That is bogus for an open source project. I won't have such updates,
> : how can i support s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14133804#comment-14133804
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-5541:
-
Thanks Michael,
[~gustavonalle]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130172#comment-14130172
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-5541:
-
Hi [~mikemccand], I think I'
+1
Run integration tests with:
- Hibernate Search
- Infinispan (indexing/searching entries with Lucene)
- Infinispan (storing indexes from Lucene)
All perfect, great job!
(For long we've been stuck on Lucene 3.x but that's finally resolved)
Sanne
On 18 January 2014 01:51, Steve R
I confirm it feels very odd for an occasional contributor that
you guys still work by attaching patch files to JIRA.
- Sanne
On 8 January 2014 00:45, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) wrote:
> +1, Mark.
>
> Git isn't perfect; I sympathize with the annoyances pointed out by Rob et.
> all.
+1
On 20 November 2013 18:00, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> +1
>
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2013/11/20 Jan Høydahl
>>
>> +1
>> Happy smoketester on Mac
>>
>> --
>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>>
>> 19. nov. 2013 kl. 15:11 skrev Simon Willnauer :
>>
>> > Please vote
gh?
Looks interesting!
Sanne - Hibernate Search team
On 27 June 2013 03:14, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would start from ManifoldCF - it may save you some work.
>
> Otis
> Solr & ElasticSearch Support
> http://sematext.com/
>
> On Jun 26, 2013 5:01 PM, "
tom Codecs for it, that isn't done yet: for
now it just stores the byte[] chunks of the segments.
This is not a replacement for Solr or ElasticSearch: it provides just
a storage component; it does not solve - among others - the problem of
distributed w
+1
tested the Maven artifacts with the testsuites from Infinispan and
Hibernate Search
On 21 December 2012 13:22, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> +1
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2012/12/21 Simon Willnauer
>>
>> same here +1
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen
>> wrote:
>> > Besides the ment
consistent work flow, but that's never been a
blocker in our case as each user is free to use what he prefers on his
personal repository.
Highly recommended!
Sanne
On 28 October 2012 16:58, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Different toys for different boys. Everyone will have his or her
> favorit
+1, Thank you all!
On 17 July 2012 21:28, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> +1 thanks uwe
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>> +1 fire away
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Smoketester passes, looks good.
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing this
Even if it has known issues, that's acceptable for an Alpha release
but at least you start
getting more feedback, especially on the API which you obviously don't
want to alter
significantly just before the final.
Regards,
Sanne
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
+1
all tests on all Lucene-using projects I contribute to pass without
any change needed (a sure sign I should add more...).
Once more, great work and thank so much to everyone involved.
Sanne
On 11 September 2011 16:11, Robert Muir wrote:
> +1, thanks for creating this release candid
+1
Sanne
2011/6/27 Michael McCandless :
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> This issue has been discussed on various occasions and lately on
>> LUCENE-3239 (https://issue
op-in compatible replacements)
Regards,
Sanne
2011/6/26 Steven A Rowe :
> +1
>
> I looked at the differences, and then just ran tests on the Solr and Lucene
> source tarballs.
>
> Steve
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
&
I don't even need to remove the
locking if I can run some of those participant threads in the remote
nodes.
I'll keep you updated, but unfortunately can't start working on it sooner.
Sanne
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Sanne Gr
will spend my time testing this carefully
instead, or if some kind of locking is still required I'd appreciate
some pointers so that I'll be able to remove them.
Regards,
Sanne
2011/4/29 Simon Willnauer :
> Hey folks,
>
> LUCENE-3023 aims to land the considerably large
> Doc
this
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_3/fileformats.html and i know what Index
> should has. is there any way to see created index?
yes, use the force :)
http://code.google.com/p/luke/
Regards,
Sanne
> thanks in advance .
> Peace.
> -Soheila D.
>
--
block which is redundant?
yes you wouldn't make any harm now, but if you release it without, and
then figure
you actually need to add it back in future, people might have code
which is not handling it.
I'm looking into Lucene 3.0.3 and the IOException it *is* actually
needed, not sure wha
2011/3/21 Earwin Burrfoot :
> Technically, there's a big difference between "I checked, and there
> was no index", and "I was unable to check the disk because file system
> went BANG!".
> So the proper behaviour is to return false & IOE (on proper occasion)?
+1 to throw the exception when proper t
e all copies when the real one is released.
-- Sanne
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Lucene-and-Solr-3-1-release-candidate-tp2645100p2675660.html
> Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---
2011/3/8 Steven A Rowe :
> Hi Sanne,
>
> Solr (and some Lucene modules) have several non-Mavenized dependencies.
>
> To work around this, the Maven build has a profile called "bootstrap". If
> you check out the source (or use the source distribution) you ca
ve, I'd add keep the pom as is but instructions and warnings
in the release notes would be very welcome. (I couldn't find a
Chances.html for Solr?)
Regards,
Sanne
[1]
http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.1RC0-rev1078688/lucene-3.1RC0/maven/org/apache/lucene/lucene
2011/3/3 Robert Muir :
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Is there any update on the 3.1 status?
>> I'm really looking forward to it :)
>>
>
> Yes, we are currently in the feature freeze, but it seems to be coming
Hello all,
Is there any update on the 3.1 status?
I'm really looking forward to it :)
Regards,
Sanne
2011/2/16 Chris Hostetter :
>
> : 1. javadocs warnings/errors: this is a constant battle, its worth
> : considering if the build should actually fail if you get one of these,
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922751#action_12922751
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-2585:
-
Hello, sorry for the late answer,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895059#action_12895059
]
Sanne Grinovero edited comment on LUCENE-2585 at 8/3/10 6:2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sanne Grinovero updated LUCENE-2585:
Description:
I could reproduce the issue several times but only by running long and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895059#action_12895059
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-2585:
-
sure, the test is totally open so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895027#action_12895027
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on LUCENE-2585:
-
I'm going to see if I can con
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Index
Affects Versions: 3.0.2, 3.0.1, 3.0, 2.9.3
Reporter: Sanne Grinovero
Fix For: 2.9.4, 3.0.3, 3.1
I could reproduce the issue several times but only by running long and
stressfull
53 matches
Mail list logo
