Awesome!!! Thank you Dawid and Robert for bumping us to Java 25.
-Chris.
> On 29 Sep 2025, at 11:57, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Just wanted to explicitly mention this so that you're not caught by surprise
> - the main branch moved on to require Java 25 so if you don't have
Uwe,
Thanks for checking with the different JDKs.
> IMHO, we should not release something that's not well tested with Java 24 or
> Java 25, so I'd suggest to backport the "SecurityManager disablement" from
> 10.x to 9.12 branch! We should also fix the smoke tester to allow running
> with Java
Congrats Ramakrishna! Excited to see your contributions as a new Lucene
committer!”
-Chris
> On 18 Sep 2025, at 08:41, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Congratulations and welcome, Ramakrishna!
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 9:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I'm pleased to announc
Kudos Trevor! Thrilled to have you join the Lucene committers family.
-Chris.
> On 18 Sep 2025, at 08:41, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Congratulations and welcome, Trevor!
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 9:03 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce that Trevor McCul
13, 2025 at 7:28 AM Benjamin Trent
>>> wrote:
>>> Hey Chris,
>>>
>>> Thank you for this proposal. I agree, these are pretty critical bug fixes.
>>>
>>> I can be released manager for this one :). Need to shake my "release
>>>
Hi,
Lucene 10.3 is not yet out the door, but I’m back proposing yet another
release! This time a bugfix release of 9.12.
My primary motivation for proposing this release is to resolve a number of
issues related to sharing of arenas in our mmap implementation. Specifically:
1. Reduce sharedAre
on to alter the plan (hmm, except I think Vigya is
>> > attending the conference heh).
>> >
>> > Mike McCandless
>> >
>> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 1:54 PM Houston Putman wrote:
&
+1
I ran with Java 21 and 24,
SUCCESS! [1:42:46.278094]
I tried with Java 25 and it failed with an error [*]. I don’t think that this
is an issue with the RC build, but rather something in the infrastructure.
-Chris.
[*]
Checking suggest
Checking test-framework
Checking licenses
Hi,
I’m sorry that I missed this earlier, but with the upcoming release of JDK 25
we should bump the upper bound JDK version check in our vectorization provider.
The changes are trivial, but do we want to do a new RC for this, since JDK 25
is due Sep 16th.
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull
Hi,
The PR - to Support JDK 25 in the Vectorization Provider [1] - has been merged
to main, branch_10x, and branch_10_3.
Apologies again, for the inconvenience of having to do another RC.
-Chris.
[1] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15157
> On 5 Sep 2025, at 12:53, Chris Hega
Thanks Uwe.
> There we only use it to keep track of attributes and how to construct them.
> In that case it is "write-once, read-many" and items are never deleted.
This is the key information. IIUC, the JDK performance regression is only
triggered by removal - and since we don’t remove, then I
Hi everyone,
branch_10x is looking great - we’ve got a bunch of solid improvements and
optimisations ready to go. Let’s get them into the hands of our users!
I’m proposing we target a 10.3 release for mid-September (around the second or
third week). I’ll find a volunteer to take on release mana
FYI - I opened the following PR to change the default read advice to back to
NORMAL.
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15040
We can continue the discussion there.
-Chris.
> On 8 Aug 2025, at 10:03, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are two related but orthogona
Hi,
There are two related but orthogonal parts to this:
1. The refactoring to IOContext and hints, that Simon has described.
2. The default advice that Lucene should use out-of-the-box.
I believe that we are in good shape to completing no.1. For no.2, we discussed
this in the following issue ht
ostly looking at whether I could find another benchmark that suggests
> > that Lucene is significantly slower in similar conditions. Does it align
> > with other people's experience that Lucene is 2x slower or more compared
> > with other good HNSW implementations?
> &g
Congratulations and welcome!
-Chris.
> On 4 Aug 2025, at 08:44, Guo Feng wrote:
>
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
> Feng
>
> On 2025/08/02 16:20:16 Michael McCandless wrote:
>> Hello Lucene developers,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that Vigya Sharma has accepted an invitation to join
>> the L
Congratulations and welcome, Guixin!
-Chris.
> On 20 Jul 2025, at 14:18, 潘桂鑫 wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thank you all! It’s a great honor to become a Lucene committer. I truly
> appreciate the encouragement and support I’ve received along the way—it’s
> been an inspiring journey, and I’m ex
> Trevor
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/130635#issuecomment-3036314864
> [2] https://github.com/mccullocht/lucene-knn-oxide/compare/main...prefetch
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 1:43 PM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
> Thanks Trevor, this is helpful. It also
on 9.7, though I don't know if it enabled the incubating vector
> > API at runtime?
> >
> > I hope that mentioning ANN benchmarks did not add noise to this thread, I
> > was mostly looking at whether I could find another benchmark that suggests
> > that Lucene i
> On 23 Jun 2025, at 14:09, Benjamin Trent wrote:
>
> - Reading floats onto heap float[] instead of accessing Memory Segments
> directly when scoring
>
This is on my list of things to do, now that we’re moving main to a minimum of
Java 25, it helps a lot.
-Chris.
-
Fixed.
I forgot to add the next bugfix version which confused the bwc test logic.
https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/20a34933748f30a3fcf9519724ee117837853b29
-Chris.
> On 20 Jun 2025, at 22:32, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed an issue with the back
Hi,
I just noticed an issue with the backward compatibility tests since I merged
the indices for 9.12.2, to branch_10x. I dunno the problem yet, but I’ll get
it fixed a.s.a.p.
java.lang.AssertionError: Index name 9.3.0 should not exist found expected
null, but was:
> at
__randomi
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 10.2.2.
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library
written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any
application that requires structured search, full-text search, faceting,
neare
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.12.2.
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly
any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform.
This
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 13 (11 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
-Chris.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 4 (4 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
-Chris.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@l
Congrats and welcome Simon!
-Chris.
> On 20 Jun 2025, at 08:06, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that Simon Cooper has accepted the PMC's invitation
> to become a committer!
>
> Simon, it is a tradition that new committers introduce themselves with a
>
Hi Adrien,
> Even though it uses Elasticsearch to run the benchmark, it really benchmarks
> Lucene functionality,
Agreed.
> This seems consistent with results from https://ann-benchmarks.com/index.html
> though I don't know if the cause of the performance difference is the same or
> not.
On
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.2
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.2.2-RC1-rev-279eb7aaafe985e5d0552b7f2a10b63185a3f893
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTest
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.12.2
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.12.2-RC1-rev-5a26234c834e4a33fd612ef8d13111ac0f0a1263
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTest
to add, but I don't see
any strong reason. Shout if I’ve missed something!
-Chris.
> On 16 Jun 2025, at 15:03, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see that all the changes we expect have been backported to branch_9_12 and
> branch_10_2. Thanks folk.
>
f65eec0e0f57f075b665d843f31a
> (sorry, no PR!) which is a small test fix needed along with removing
> HNSW connectedCOmponents
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:33 PM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
> >
> > Github milestones are not super insightful here, since some PRs are closed,
> &g
On 11 Jun 2025, at 16:54, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There has been several threads on the need for a 9.12.2 release [1][2]. And
> given that, it makes sense to have the equivalent fixes in a shipping 10.x
> release - 10.2.2, so that 10.x is not disadvantaged agai
Welcome Stefan,
-Chris.
> On 6 May 2025, at 08:23, Luca Cavanna wrote:
>
> Congrats and welcome Stefan!
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:17 AM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Stefan!
>
> On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 2:56 PM Michael McCandless
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Lucene developer
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 10.2.1.
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library
written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any
application that requires structured search, full-text search, faceting,
neare
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 9 (7 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED.
-Chris.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@l
> On 28 Apr 2025, at 08:07, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> Hi Chris, I just commented on the issue. It's not a bug, we can proceed with
> this build candidate.
Thanks Adrien.
Let the vote continue!
-Chris.
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
Elasticsearch. I’ve not fully groked the
scenario yet, but it’s clearly a behavioural change. I added what I know to the
issue.
-Chris.
> On 26 Apr 2025, at 09:58, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 10.2.1
>
> The artifacts can be downlo
Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 10.2.1
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.2.1-RC2-rev-1b2451b5f435ad2c41a8b6b0f0d6a59b24ff9ad2
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTest
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:07 PM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lu
Hi,
> On 24 Apr 2025, at 21:00, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> ...
>
> For reference, Ben also flagged this one as a candidate for 10.2.1:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14543. I'm undecided on including it.
> On the one hand, it's been introduced in 10.0.0, on the other hand it causes
> t
ome kernels backported the
> patch?). I don't think this RC includes the revert yet.
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:06 AM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> htt
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.1
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.2.1-RC1-rev-02cf96b8f7c87fdf5eab864bfc242d36aa2086e7
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTest
Hi,
We’ve run into some severe issues with Lucene 10.2 [1][2], mostly relating some
bad interactions with iterators, DenseConjunctionBulkScorer and DocIdStream.
I strongly believe that at least one of the issues is fixed by this PR,
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14522. We’re still inv
+1 SUCCESS! [0:54:50.340237]
-Chris
> On 7 Apr 2025, at 19:06, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:49.436885]
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM Michael McCandless
> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks Ignacio!
>
> SUCCESS! [0:23:44.874191]
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.co
Congrats and welcome, Michael!
-Chris
> On 6 Mar 2025, at 08:05, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that Michael Froh has accepted the PMC's invitation
> to become a Lucene committer.
>
> Michael, the tradition is for new committers to shortly introduce the
Ugh! Sorry for breaking all these CI jobs.
If I can do anything to help get them updated, then please let me know.
Maybe I should have checked and update CI configurations before bumping?
-Chris.
> On 28 Feb 2025, at 08:22, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> I've updated this configuration to use Java 2
Thank you Dawid,
-Chris.
> On 27 Feb 2025, at 12:44, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> I've modified the configuration of this Jenkins config to use Java 23.
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 1:26 PM Apache Jenkins Server
> wrote:
> Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-m
Hi Dawid,
This does not reproduce for me :-( I’ll keep trying…
It’s a little worrying, since I did make changes to DirectIODirectory recently.
https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14106
-Chris.
> On 27 Feb 2025, at 09:14, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> Timeout on the entire class -
>
> TestDi
Hi,
The main branch has been bumped to require a minimum of Java 23. The motivation
and discussion for this is in https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14229
If you develop Lucene, you’re going to need to set JAVA_HOME to JDK 23 for
build and test. The 10x branch still requires a minimum of J
Hello,
It is my pleasure to announce Dawid Weiss as the new Chair of the Lucene
Project.
The ASF Board met on Feb 19th, and unanimously passed the resolution to change
the project Chair to Dawid.
Congratulations Dawid. Thanks for stepping up.
-Chris.
--
SUCCESS! [0:53:06.424735]
+1
-Chris.
> On 17 Dec 2024, at 16:51, Luca Cavanna wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 10.1.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.1.0-RC2-rev-884954006de769dc43b811267230d625886e65
SUCCESS! [1:37:01.495562]
+1
-Chris.
> On 16 Dec 2024, at 17:20, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> SUCCESS! [1:54:16.305613]
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 4:32 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:16:40.906176]
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 9:05 AM Luca Cavanna wrote:
>>>
>>
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.12.1.
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly
any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform.
This
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 8 (8 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
-Chris.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@l
Thanks Luca,
I added one more issue to the milestone - to add 9.12.1 index version constant
and backward compat tests [*].
I’ll get these merged tomorrow - all going well with the 9.12.1 release.
-Chris.
[*] https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14060
> On 11 Dec 2024, at 20:53, Luca Cavann
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.12.1
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.12.1-RC1-rev-7a97a05a239d6fb9f1f347aa09bfa52e875be092
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTest
Hi Ignacio,
I completely agree with the idea of having a BytesRef-like thing that can be
off-heap. For a while now I’ve been thinking about how we could evolve BytesRef
so as to not expose its on-heap representation. Having a separate primitive is
probably a better way to go.
-Chris.
> On 5 D
Hi,
As proposed and agreed previously [*], I plan to start the 9.12.1 release build
on Monday, Dec 9th.
If you have a bug fix that is intended for 9.12.1, then please ensure that it’s
merged before the 9th, or reply to this thread so that we can coordinate.
-Chris
[*] https://lists.apache.or
Hi,
Seems like Lucene 10 was just yesterday, but there are already a number of
really nice changes accumulating in branch_10x. Let’s flush that branch with a
10.1 release.
Given that I've already proposed a 9.12.1 separately, let’s avoid any overlap
and release 10.1 some time the week of Dec 1
17:01, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While 9.12 is the last in the 9.x series, there is currently a small number
> of bug fixes that are sitting in branch_9_12. If you have a bug fix that
> should be 9.12.1, then please feel free to commit it or use the 9.12.1
>
Hi,
While 9.12 is the last in the 9.x series, there is currently a small number of
bug fixes that are sitting in branch_9_12. If you have a bug fix that should be
9.12.1, then please feel free to commit it or use the 9.12.1 milestone in GH.
From my point of view, there is no immediacy in releas
Hi Stefan,
> On 11 Oct 2024, at 08:09, Stefan Vodita wrote:
>
> No worries at all Chris, I didn't know we could retroactively
> edit the release notes for 9.12. I've gone ahead and added
> an entry for the aggregation engine.
I’ve taken the update that you made to the draft notes on the wiki, a
Hi Stefan,
> On 10 Oct 2024, at 16:41, Stefan Vodita wrote:
>
> ...
>
> We didn't mention the new aggregation engine [1] in the release notes for 9.12
> and that seems like a missed opportunity. It's a significant change, which
> improves over the existing faceting functionality in terms of fle
+1
SUCCESS! [3:08:50.803948]
I ran the smoktester with JDK 21.0.x, 22.0.x, and 23. Hence the long run time
:-)
-Chris.
> On 10 Oct 2024, at 08:24, Luca Cavanna wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki
To close the loop on this.
Tombstone branch_9x PR raised and merged.
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13882
-Chris.
> On 10 Oct 2024, at 11:27, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> Thank you, Chris!
>
> Dawid
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:23 PM Chris Hegarty
> w
> branch_9x - redirect people to the next
> major dev branch but leave the label? There are ways of protecting commits to
> dead branches as well, to prevent accidental
> commits.
>
> Dawid
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:13 PM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
> H
Hi Dawid,
> On 10 Oct 2024, at 10:57, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> Hmm... Has someone removed branch_9x entirely from the origin git?
Yes, that was me, see
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8nvnqm7njjho7df99fjx6dxm4zcr7dhj
Before removing I checked that there was nothing in that branch that is not
SUCCESS! [1:10:30.653744]
+1
-Chris.
> On 5 Oct 2024, at 18:36, Luca Cavanna wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome.
Hi,
> On 4 Oct 2024, at 16:08, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> ...
>
> I just re-checked, and branch_9x has nothing in it that is not already in
> branch_9_12.
>
> I’ll delete branch_9x tomorrow, if there are not ob
branch_9_12.
I’ll delete branch_9x tomorrow, if there are not objections.
-Chris.
> Cheers
> Luca
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:57 PM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since we bumped and stabilised the main branch to 11, and also cut the
> branches for 10, w
Hi,
Since we bumped and stabilised the main branch to 11, and also cut the branches
for 10, we can now merge changes into main as usual, and backport to
`branch_10x`.
The last scheduled minor release in the 9 series is 9.12.0. However, the
`branch_9_12` can be used for bug fixing, if at all.
> On 2 Oct 2024, at 15:20, Luca Cavanna wrote:
>
> ...
> My understanding is that before respinning, we want to add additional tests
> to reproduce the issue and ensure it is fixed. Does that align with your
> expectations? Anything to add?
>
The test has been added, see https://github.com
> On 1 Oct 2024, at 20:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> I’m working on it, and hope to have the BWC testing issues resolved soon.
>
> I opened the following PR to address this -
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13848
Merged - bwc and ma
> On 1 Oct 2024, at 14:47, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I know that this is broken - I broke it when cutting the 10xx branches, so
> that the 10 release can start.
>
> I know that this is disruptive, since it’s not possible to get a clean PR on
> main.
>
SUCCESS! [0:53:16.589622]
+1 (binding)
-Chris.
> On 1 Oct 2024, at 16:32, Luca Cavanna wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is
Uwe,
> On 1 Oct 2024, at 08:08, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> Hi,
> are we ready for a release. Because at moment I don't think we have fully
> cleaned up the codecs and this could lead to problems when going to 11.x
> because of version numbers in the index files!?
> • Rename the most recent c
Hi,
I know that this is broken - I broke it when cutting the 10xx branches, so that
the 10 release can start.
I know that this is disruptive, since it’s not possible to get a clean PR on
main.
I’m working on it, and hope to have the BWC testing issues resolved soon.
Apologies for the inconve
Uwe,
> On 30 Sep 2024, at 16:38, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Am 30.09.2024 um 12:46 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
>> Uwe,
>> Can you please adjust the Jenkins to build and test these new 10xx branches?
>> Or lemme know what I can do to make this happen.
> This is a
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:47 AM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In preparation for the upcoming Lucene 10 release:
>>
>> 1. The main branch has been bumped to start accumulating changes for 11.x
>> 2. The branch_10_0 has been cut to sta
The bump to 11 in main has completely borked the backward compat tests. Sorry.
Is there a way to quickly mute them, until they can be fixed up properly?
-Chris.
> On 30 Sep 2024, at 11:46, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In preparation for the upcoming Lucene 10 release
Hi,
In preparation for the upcoming Lucene 10 release:
1. The main branch has been bumped to start accumulating changes for 11.x
2. The branch_10_0 has been cut to stabilise the 10.0.0 release.
3. The branch_10x has been cut to start accumulating the 10.1.0 changes.
Uwe,
Can you please adjust
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.12.0.
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library
written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any
application that requires structured search, full-text search, faceting,
neare
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 12 (11 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
-Chris.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...
Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.12.0
This build includes the bwc stuff with 8.11.4.
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.12.0-RC2-rev-e913796758de3d9b9440669384b29bec07e6a5cd
You can run the smoke tester directly with this
e.org/thread/0znxm3yltnkbv0sq4l6hxpljrqr1bok9
>
> Ant versions shipped with operating systems are "misconfigured".
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 25.09.2024 um 12:22 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
>> Hi Houston,
>>
>>> On 25 Sep 2024, at 09:56, Chris Hegarty
>&g
Hi,
> On 25 Sep 2024, at 13:08, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 7:01 AM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for release, unless the uncovered issue with TieredMergePolicy causes
> > malfunction.
>
> My analysis concludes that there
It would be good to have Adrien or Mike confirm.
-Chris.
> Uwe
> Am 23.09.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
>> Thanks Uwe,
>>
>> I reproduced this failure on main and branch_9_12.
>>
>> The following issue has been created to track this,
>> https:
Hi Houston,
> On 25 Sep 2024, at 09:56, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Dawid,
>
> This was expected - good that it was caught.
>
> I filed https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13821
I tried, but was unsuccessful in creating these 8.11.4 backwards compat i
Thanks Dawid,
This was expected - good that it was caught.
I filed https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13821
-Chris.
> On 25 Sep 2024, at 07:25, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> Nightly smoke tester failed last night:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/runs/11025229258/job/30619746011
>
> On 23 Sep 2024, at 15:04, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> I enabled 9.12 Jobs on Policeman Jenkins.
Thank you Uwe.
-Chris.
> ...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Thanks Uwe,
I reproduced this failure on main and branch_9_12.
The following issue has been created to track this,
https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13818.
Git bisect has identified the first failure as "Add target search concurrency
to TieredMergePolicy (#13430)"
-Chris.
> On 23 Sep 2
's been fixed since then.
>
> In the end, I think it's your call whether to respin or not, either way
> likely works.
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 6:53 PM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m aware that I initiated this vote while the 8.11.4 vote is sti
17:02, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.12.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.12.0-RC1-rev-f9cb943157870156af5f31cce315b95c08295c03
>
> You can r
Hi,
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.12.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.12.0-RC1-rev-f9cb943157870156af5f31cce315b95c08295c03
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smo
so as to add a job on the 9_12 branch.
-Chris.
> On 19 Sep 2024, at 11:21, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For Lucene 9.12, we have the following blocking issues:
>
> 1. TestLucene90DocValuesFormat fails with ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> 2. TestBestCompres
has
ords out of order
No.1 and no.2 might be the same underlying issue. Dunno yet.
-Chris.
> On 16 Sep 2024, at 11:41, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following on from Adrien’s thread on the upcoming releases [1], I’m starting
> a new thread specific to Lucene
Hi,
Following on from Adrien’s thread on the upcoming releases [1], I’m starting a
new thread specific to Lucene 9.12.
As release manager for 9.12, I would like to propose the follow schedule:
1. Feature Freeze Thursday 19th
- create `branch_9_12`
- sunset `branch_9x`
2. Create RC build a
> On 31 Aug 2024, at 16:51, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> I've added jdk 23-ea to this gh action:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/runs/10641649862
Excellent. Thank you.
-Chris.
>
> D.
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 5:52 PM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
Hi Uwe,
> On 30 Aug 2024, at 15:31, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> I agree, smoke tester is not easy. This is on TODO list for me. I am happy
> that you can pass multiple JDKs in a single command line and then it works
> for 2 hours. But yes, I was not able to run smoker on Java 22 or Java 23 up
>
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
