Re: Requesting Lucene API to allow resetting index created version property

I'm strongly opposed to allowing code to change/reset this value. Lucene needs to be able to defend itself from bogus bug reports for this and ensure back compat really works. I instead support Mark Miller's proposal to only increase the minimum-version when necessary on the lucene side: https://g

Re: Requesting Lucene API to allow resetting index created version property

Adrien, Appreciate your thoughts on this. I agree that the option of reindexing into a separate Directory is less "surgical" and definitely something to consider when the scale is manageable. Solr already has an API which ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

+1 (non-binding) SUCCESS! [1:03:29.655461] On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 4:55 PM Stefan Vodita wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:47:56.228055] > > On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 17:07, Chris Hegarty > wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.1 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> h

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:47:56.228055] On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 17:07, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.2.1-RC1-rev-02cf96b8f7c87fdf5eab864bfc242d36aa2086e7 > > Y

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:46:48.162090] I agree with not including changes to read advices in 10.2.1, it feels too big a change for inclusion in a patch release. For reference, Ben also flagged this one as a candidate for 10.2.1: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14543. I'm undecided on including it. On

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:18:42.555612] I disabled the -Dtests.nightly as I did for 10.2.0 release: I think majority of the major issues around nightly tests have been improved, just that fixes are in the 10.x (to be 10.3.0) and main only. Thanks to everyone for helping to fix these failures. Hopefully for t

Re: Planned OS Upgrade for lucene-solr-1 and lucene-solr-2

I've added a comment on [1] asking how we should handle snapshot uploads, which are currently failing. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26732 On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:04 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > Nice! I can't think of anything. I guess we just let it burn? I can't > see any downs

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

Hi Vigya, > Should we also revert the default ReadAdvice.RANDOM setting for 10.2.1 > release? I would prefer to not revert this in 10.2.1. The performance issue is not new in 10.2, it was introduced in a prior release. The focus of 10.2.1 is to address a couple of severe bugs are new in 10.2

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

Should we also revert the default ReadAdvice.RANDOM setting for 10.2.1 release? There are multiple reports (1 , 2 ) of performance regressions after this change. Issue #14408

[VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.1 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.2.1-RC1-rev-02cf96b8f7c87fdf5eab864bfc242d36aa2086e7 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTest

Re: Requesting Lucene API to allow resetting index created version property

Hi Rahul, I'm still concerned about going with in-place upgrading instead of reindexing in a separate directory. I don't mind opening an issue for discussion, but I'd like the option of reindexing into a separate directory to be considered. I think that it has lots of merits by avoiding multiple v