Re: SNAPSHOT builds

Also, lucene-spatial module's last release was 8.4. So I'm confused why there are any artifacts past 8.4 let alone one built in 2019 for 9.0.0? Seems like all the modules should be consistent on a consistent SHA? Is this snapshot repository used for anything? Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP Principal

SNAPSHOT builds

Anyone familiar with how the lucene snapshot builds are generated on repository.apache.org? Are they auto published somehow or manually published? Looks like the artifacts include timestamp and build identifier but all the m

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

I can wait till this PR 2502 is backported (hopefully by tomorrow? and hopefully will be the last item to wait for). And tomorrow I will try to build a RC. On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:57 AM Cassandra Targett wrote: > It’s OK with me, but I’m not really in a position to understand the > changes an

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Coverage-main - Build # 62 - Unstable!

Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9988 to track. I think I know what's going on. Cheers, -Greg On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:18 AM Greg Miller wrote: > > Hmm, thanks for raising this! I'll have a look. > > Cheers, > -Greg > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:01 AM Michael McCandless > wro

Re: Dynamic numeric range

Hi Greg, Thank you so much! I will create a Jira issue today. Best, Yuting On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:02 PM Greg Miller wrote: > [Disclaimer: I work with Yuting on Product Search at Amazon] > > I think this is super interesting to explore! It would be useful to > have an implementation like L

Re: Dynamic numeric range

Hi Gautam, Thank you for sharing your thoughts! Matplotlib is a great resource I should look at. Currently, I am exploring the possibility of generating equi-probable buckets with variable widths based on the data. Uniform bin width is a good starting point as it will be easy to merge buckets f

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Coverage-main - Build # 62 - Unstable!

Hmm, thanks for raising this! I'll have a look. Cheers, -Greg On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:01 AM Michael McCandless wrote: > > Maybe related to LUCENE-9944? > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:46 AM Apache Jenkins Server > wrote: >> >> Build: http

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Coverage-main - Build # 62 - Unstable!

Maybe related to LUCENE-9944? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:46 AM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Coverage-main/62/ > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: org.apache.lucen

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

It’s OK with me, but I’m not really in a position to understand the changes and/or test it. And while we have a branch, I’m not clear on when the first RC is planned, so Mayya should weigh in I think. Cassandra On Jun 3, 2021, 5:49 AM -0500, Jan Høydahl , wrote: > Mayya, Cassandra, I'd like to m

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x - Build # 220 - Still Failing!

I pushed a commit to branch_8x yesterday that I expect has fixed this. The 'generate-maven-artifacts' task now succeeds for me locally at least. The Jenkins job failed in the overnight run, but it looks to be a consequence of the release process that Mayya has in flight: "RuntimeError: Future rel

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

Mayya, Cassandra, I'd like to merge the Jetty upgrade, SOLR-15316 to branch_8x and branch_8_9. See backport PR https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2502 Is that ok? Jan > 2. jun. 2021 kl. 01:00 skrev Jan Høydahl : > > Cassandra, > > Thanks for spotting the Jetty JIRA (SOLR-15316 >