Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-13 Thread Alex Schultz
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Adam Huffman wrote: > HI Alex, > > I finally found the parameter for this, which is NeutronPublicInterface. > > However, it looks like os-net-config can't cope with alias interfaces (which > are all I have on this test node). > > I did try with master, and there wa

Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-13 Thread Adam Huffman
HI Alex, I finally found the parameter for this, which is NeutronPublicInterface. However, it looks like os-net-config can't cope with alias interfaces (which are all I have on this test node). I did try with master, and there was a similar error with a config image value missing. Is it worthwhi

Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-12 Thread Alex Schultz
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Adam Huffman wrote: > The next failure appears to be because os-net-config is looking for the > non-existent eth1 interface: > > TASK [Output for NetworkDeployment] > fatal: [192.168.24.1]: FAILED! => { > "failed_when_result": true, > "msg": [ > {

Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-12 Thread Adam Huffman
The next failure appears to be because os-net-config is looking for the non-existent eth1 interface: TASK [Output for NetworkDeployment] fatal: [192.168.24.1]: FAILED! => { "failed_when_result": true, "msg": [ { "stderr": [ "[2018-04-12 17:27:17,906] (he

Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-12 Thread Adam Huffman
Hi Alex, Thanks, that step was indeed missing from the instructions, and it gets a lot further. I'll take a look at the updated documentation too. Best Wishes, Adam On 12 April 2018 at 17:02, Alex Schultz wrote: > So it should be noted that we're actively working on the containerized > underc

Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-12 Thread Alex Schultz
So it should be noted that we're actively working on the containerized undercloud deployment process for Rocky and you might want to try the new way we will be going forward with. You can see the updated documentation https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558893/. It's much simpler than the existing doc

Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-12 Thread Adam Huffman
Here's the more detailed log: 2018-04-12 14:25:24.769 2 INFO heat.engine.service [req-3e106a9e-6b06-445e-abcf-44706c00d50a admin admin - - -] Creating stack undercloud-UndercloudServiceChain-elou4xokwrep-ServiceChain-e6umma7beuwd 2018-04-12 14:25:26.368 2 INFO heat.engine.resource [req-3e1

Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-12 Thread Adam Huffman
Thanks, a bit further now: 2018-04-12 13:25:23Z [undercloud.UndercloudServiceChain]: CREATE_IN_PROGRESS state changed 2018-04-12 13:25:24Z [undercloud.UndercloudServiceChain]: CREATE_IN_PROGRESS Stack CREATE started 2018-04-12 13:25:24Z [undercloud.UndercloudServiceChain.LoggingConfiguration]: C

Re: [rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-12 Thread Thomas Herve
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Adam Huffman wrote: > I've been following the guide at: > > http://tripleo.org/containers_deployment/undercloud.html > > to test a containerised deployment. > > Here's what I have installed: > > [stack@tripleo000 containers-2018-04-12]$ rpm -q python-tripleoclient

[rdo-dev] Heat problem with containerised undercloud

2018-04-12 Thread Adam Huffman
I've been following the guide at: http://tripleo.org/containers_deployment/undercloud.html to test a containerised deployment. Here's what I have installed: [stack@tripleo000 containers-2018-04-12]$ rpm -q python-tripleoclient python2-openstackclient openstack-heat-agents docker openvswitch pyt