> Glance was pinned in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/24257 with the
> link to an upstream commit which maybe broke py2 at that time
looking closer, this was not py2 breakage, it was due to failing tests
in puppet-openstack-integration after native SSL support was
completely removed in Glance htt
> So in this case I'm asking for the first instance of such an
> exception. Could the cent7 Glance container be updated to have a newer
> version of Glance containing this change [2].
>
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:glance-multistore
> [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705229/
In thi
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:05 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
>> wrote:
>>> What do you think about this plan?, is there any reason to keep CentOS 7
>>> artificially consistent and promoting at this point of the transition to
>>> CentOS 8?
There's a TripleO patch [1] blocked as a result. The patc
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:56 AM Mike Burns wrote:
> So, if I understand this right...
>
> * We're keeping the centos7 and centos8 versions of Ussuri consistent
> * There is no actual build of the latest commits built on either centos7
> or centos8
> * There is no possible way to have an Ussuri r
So, if I understand this right...
* We're keeping the centos7 and centos8 versions of Ussuri consistent
* There is no actual build of the latest commits built on either centos7 or
centos8
* There is no possible way to have an Ussuri release on Centos7
Assuming the above is true, I would say to tu
Hi,
I'd like to open a discussion about the status of RDO Ussuri repositories
on CentOS7.
As you know RDO and upstream teams (kolla, puppet-openstack, TripleO,
TripleO CI, etc...) have been working to switch to CentOS8 during last few
weeks.
In order to make the transition easier from CentOS 7 t
