Yes
- 原始邮件 -
发件人:Sherlock Homles
收件人:dev@linkis.apache.org
主题:Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.2.0-RC1
日期:2022年08月23日 23点49分
+1 approve(binding)
[YES] Download links are valid.
[YES] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[YES] Source code distributions have correct na
yes
- 原始邮件 -
发件人:
收件人:""
主题:回复:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.2.0-RC1
日期:2022年08月23日 21点18分
yes
- 原始邮件 -
发件人:"cas...@apache.org"
收件人:dev
主题:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.2.0-RC1
日期:2022年08月23日 17点58分
+1 (non-binding)
I checked
- The checksums a
+1 approve(binding)
[YES] Download links are valid.
[YES] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[YES] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each repo.
[YES] Check by apache-rat tool that all files have license he
yes
- 原始邮件 -
发件人:"cas...@apache.org"
收件人:dev
主题:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.2.0-RC1
日期:2022年08月23日 17点58分
+1 (non-binding)
I checked
- The checksums and signatures are validate.
- LICENSE and NOTICE file look good to me.
- There is DISCLAIMER
- No unlicensed compiled
Dear:
The chat records of WeChat group“Apache linkis Community Development Group”are
as follows微信群"Apache Linkis 社区开发群"的聊天记录如下
— 2022-8-19 —
Mr. Flash 14:51
Brother Longping, I would like to ask if I modify the code of plug-in such as
Sendmail plug-in, do I need to update th
Dear:
The chat records of WeChat group“Apache linkis Community Development Group”are
as follows微信群"Apache Linkis 社区开发群"的聊天记录如下
— 2022-8-18 —
casion 20:46
Linkis new big version 1.2.0, will be released soon
The main functions are new
* Added support for the Presto engine
Dear:
The chat records of WeChat group“Apache linkis Community Development Group”are
as follows微信群"Apache Linkis 社区开发群"的聊天记录如下
— 2022-8-17 —
casion 10:44
Es engine configuration address HTTP prefix
https://github.com/apache/incubator-linkis/pull/2820 @ wForget compatible -
iQIY
+1 approve(binding)
[YES] Download links are valid.
[YES] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[YES] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each repo.
[YES] Check by apache-rat tool that all files have license he
+1 (non-binding)
I checked
- The checksums and signatures are validate.
- LICENSE and NOTICE file look good to me.
- There is DISCLAIMER
- No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive.
- All source files have ASF headers
- Build successfully on the window&jdk8 by the command ”./mvnw