Request permission to contribute to Apache Kafka

Hi Kafka devs, I'd like to request permission to contribute to Apache Kafka for a new KIP. My Wiki ID is: mattw4 My JIRA ID is: mattw4 Email: matt.we...@intel.com Thanks in advance! --Matt

[DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

Hello all, I'd like to propose a change that would allow the producer performance test to have a warmup phase where the statistics gathered could be separated from statistics gathered during steady state. Although startup is an important phase of Kafka operations and special attention should b

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Align the naming convention for config and default variables in *Config classes

Hi Eric, Apologies for the KIP number conflict. I'm not sure how the community handles these race conditions, but I think we've got it sorted. Also not sure if this is the right action, but it might be less confusing if you re-send your DISCUSS email to the dev list with the correct title and

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

Hello again Kafka devs, I'd like to again call attention to this KIP for discussion. Apparently, we encountered a race condition when choosing KIP numbers, but hopefully it's straightened out now. Regards, Matt -Original Message----- From: Welch, Matt Sent: Thursday, June 6,

[QUESTION] What to do about conflicted KIP numbers?

Hi Kafka devs, I submitted a KIP last week and encountered a KIP-process race condition where my KIP number was consumed by another dev without updating the wiki page containing KIPs: Kafka Improvement Proposals - Apache Kafka - Apache Software Foundation

RE: [QUESTION] What to do about conflicted KIP numbers?

-Matthias On 6/14/24 3:10 PM, Welch, Matt wrote: > Hi Kafka devs, > > I submitted a KIP last week and encountered a KIP-process race condition > where my KIP number was consumed by another dev without updating the wiki > page containing KIPs: Kafka Improvement Propo

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

p times, but I haven't been able to reason about it in my head. What are your thoughts on this? -- Divij Vaidya On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 12:23 AM Eric Lu wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Yes I forgot to update the KIP counter after creating a KIP. I changed > mine to 1053. We should be all g

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

t; " to make it clear. > > 2. What will be the output containing both warm-up and steady-state results? > Could you give an example directly? > > For better understanding, I'd suggest you refer to KIP-1057 > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1057%3A

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

indow's p99)? Once p99 is stable enough, the tool could start the steady-state phase printing out the computed warmup size. In case we decide this is tricky or undesired behavior, we can list the autopilot mode in the rejected alternatives, along with motivations. > bin/kafka-prod

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

be helpful. Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Welch, Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 1:38 PM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test Hi Federico, Thanks for your response. I have a few questions. > You mean, no exis

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

short tests. If nobody has any more comments on this proposal, I think we might have consensus so is it appropriate to call a vote now? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Welch, Matt Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 4:13 PM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable w

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

vote next week if nobody has any additional input or concerns. Thanks and best regards, Matt -Original Message----- From: Welch, Matt Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 2:54 PM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test Hi all, After muc

[VOTE] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

Hi all,   It seems discussion has been quiet for a couple of weeks so I'd like to call a vote on KIP-1052 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1052%3A+Enable+warmup+in+producer+performance+test   Thanks, Matt Welch

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

. Thanks! Just a suggestion: I think that the following output line does not add much value and could be removed. "Warmup first 10 records. Steady-state results will print after the complete-test summary." On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 8:06 PM Welch, Matt wrote: > > > H

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

anks, Matt -Original Message- From: Justine Olshan Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 4:36 PM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test +1 (binding) from me. Thanks, Justine On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:22 PM Welch, Matt wrote: >

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

On 2024/09/04 22:20:15 "Welch, Matt" wrote: > Hi Kafka devs, > > Bumping this VOTE thread again for visibility. > > Thanks, > Matt > > -Original Message- > From: Welch, Matt > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 4:26 PM > To: dev@kafka.apache.org >

RE: [VOTE] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

Welch, Matt wrote: > Hi Kafka Devs, > > Bumping VOTE thread again for visibility. > > Thanks to Justine and Federico who've cast their votes on KIP-1052! > Current vote tally: > Justine Olshan: +1 (binding) > Federico Valeri: +1 (non-binding) > &g