New contributor

2020-11-16 Thread Vidor Kanalas
Hello, could you please add me as a contributor for Apache Kafka? github: dorwi (https://github.com/dorwi) jira: dorwi Thanks, Vidor

[DISCUSS] KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing in MirrorMaker

2024-10-30 Thread Vidor Kanalas
Hi Daniel, This would indeed greatly reduce the duplicate processing on failbacks. Few questions: 1. Adding another offset sync store might be memory intensive. Would it make sense (if possible) to filter the topics in it based on the reverseCheckpointingTopicFilter? 2. Would it make sen

RE: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing in MirrorMaker

2024-10-30 Thread Vidor Kanalas
Hi Daniel, This would indeed greatly reduce the duplicate processing on failbacks. Few questions: Adding another offset sync store might be memory intensive. Would it make sense (if possible) to filter the topics in it based on the reverseCheckpointingTopicFilter? Would it make sense to add a

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing in MirrorMaker

2024-10-30 Thread Vidor Kanalas
Hi Daniel, This would indeed greatly reduce the duplicate processing on failbacks. Few questions: 1. Since having a second offset-sync store can be memory intensive, would it make sense to filter the topics in it based on the reverseCheckpointingTopicFilter? 2. Would it make sens

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing in MirrorMaker

2024-10-28 Thread Vidor Kanalas
Hi Daniel, This would indeed greatly reduce the duplicate processing on failbacks. Few questions: 1. Adding another offset sync store might be memory intensive. Would it make sense (if possible) to filter the topics in it based on the reverseCheckpointingTopicFilter? 2. Would it make sen

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing

2024-10-28 Thread Vidor Kanalas
Hi Daniel, This would indeed greatly reduce the duplicate processing on failbacks. Few questions: 1. Adding another offset sync store might be memory intensive. Would it make sense (if possible) to filter the topics in it based on the reverseCheckpointingTopicFilter? 2. Would it make sen

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing

2024-10-28 Thread Vidor Kanalas
Hi Daniel, This would indeed greatly reduce the duplicate processing on failbacks. Few questions: 1. Adding another offset sync store might be memory intensive. Would it make sense (if possible) to filter the topics in it based on the reverseCheckpointingTopicFilter? 2. Would it make sen

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing in MirrorMaker

2024-11-15 Thread Vidor Kanalas
sters to be used by producers - > > the > > > name is the same, but those are logically 2 different topics. With > > > IdentityReplicationPolicy, we require users to avoid loops (i.e. > > > replicating the same messages back and forth infinitely). > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing in MirrorMaker

2024-12-02 Thread Vidor Kanalas
Hi, thanks for the KIP! +1 (non-binding) Best, Vidor On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 10:15 AM Dániel Urbán wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-1098: Reverse Checkpointing in > MirrorMaker ( > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1098%3A+Reverse+Checkpointing+in+