Re: [VOTE] KIP-334 Include partitions in exceptions raised during consumer record deserialization/validation

messages from the old thread to it to address them? Thank you. Sarwar On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:18 AM Stanislav Kozlovski wrote: > Hey all, > > To revive this old KIP, Sarwar Bhuiyan has volunteered to take over > ownership. > He will continue to drive this KIP to approval and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Kafka PMC Member: Bill Bejeck

Congrats Bill! On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:52 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > Congratulations Bill, well deserved! > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 11:26 PM Adam Bellemare > wrote: > > > > Congratulations Bill!! > > > > > On Apr 17, 2021, at 5:20 PM, Kowshik Prakasam > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Congrats

Re: [VOTE] KIP-334 Include partitions in exceptions raised during consumer record deserialization/validation

Apr 22, 2021 at 10:30 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > Hi Sarwar, > > It seems like we didn't reach a consensus last time about this KIP. So I > would suggest revising the KIP, and then creating a new DISCUSS thread when > it's ready for review. > > regards, > Colin

[DISCUSS] KIP-334 Include partitions in exceptions during consumer record deserialization/validation (Round 2)

Hi all, I'm reviving this discussion after perusing the vote thread created by Stan. I believe the KIP is already revised to include Jason and Colin's suggestion of using a RecordDeserializationException. It signals to the user that something needs to be done (whether skipping the record as shown

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-334 Include partitions in exceptions during consumer record deserialization/validation (Round 2)

Jason, Colin, and Mathias, do you have any comments on the KIP as it stands now? Thank you. Sarwar On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 10:12, Sarwar Bhuiyan wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm reviving this discussion after perusing the vote thread created by > Stan. I believe the KIP is already r

[VOTE] KIP-334 - Include partitions in exceptions raised during consumer record deserialization/validation

Thanks Colin, Matthias, and Jason on the discussion on this really old KIP. As discussed, I'd like to start to vote on KIP-334: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=87297793 Thank you. Sarwar -- [image: Confluent] <https://www.confluent.io/> Sarwar Bh

Re: [VOTE] KIP-334 - Include partitions in exceptions raised during consumer record deserialization/validation

t; > -Jason > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 2:34 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, Sarwar. > > > > best, > > Colin > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, at 13:29, Sarwar Bhuiyan wrote: > > > Thanks Colin, Matthias, and Ja

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-12906) Consumer should include partition and offset number in deserialization exception

Sarwar Bhuiyan created KAFKA-12906: -- Summary: Consumer should include partition and offset number in deserialization exception Key: KAFKA-12906 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12906

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10760) In compacted topic with max.compaction.lag.ms, the segments are not rolled until new messages arrive

Sarwar Bhuiyan created KAFKA-10760: -- Summary: In compacted topic with max.compaction.lag.ms, the segments are not rolled until new messages arrive Key: KAFKA-10760 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse