+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:41 AM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Satish.
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 1:45 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 3:13 PM Ted Yu wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu
Congrats, Dong Lin!
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Dong Lin became a committer in March 2018. Since then, he has remained
> active in the community and contributed a number of patches, reviewed
> several pull requests and participated in numerous KIP discu
n Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:53 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> Implementation-wise is it just a filter over the returned ACL listing or do
> you plan to add new methods to the Authorizer as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Viktor
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:18 PM Pri
sts: *
> User:User1 has Allow permission for operations: Describe from hosts: *
>
> Thanks,
> Satish.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:13 AM, Harsha wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harsha
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, at
/dc7f6005845a372a0a48a40872a32d9ece03807a4fb1bb89d3645afb@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
Thanks,
Manikumar
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:41 AM Jason Gustafson wrote:
> +1 Thanks for the updates.
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:15 AM, Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
> viktorsomo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sure, I've added it. I'll also do the testing today.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 10:06 PM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP,
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 8/30/18 11:30 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> > > Thanks for the KIP. I'm +1 (n
Jakub Scholz wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:24 PM Manikumar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start voting on KIP-357 which allows to list ACLs per
>
Hi all,
I have created a KIP that proposes couple of options for building custom
SSL principal names.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-371%3A+Add+a+configuration+to+build+custom+SSL+principal+name
Please take a look.
Thanks,
Manikumar
Bump!
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:58 PM Adam Bellemare
wrote:
> +1 (non binding) - would really like to see this one.
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 3:14 PM Manikumar
> > wrote:
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:24 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding),
>
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> Viktor
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:14 AM Attila Sasvári
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-363:
> > *
> >
> https://cwi
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks for the KIP.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:44 PM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
>
> Ismael
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:02 AM Dongjin Lee wrote:
>
> > Hello, I would like to start a VOTE on KIP-110: Add Codec for ZStandard
> > Compression.
> >
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:38 AM Harsha wrote:
> +1 (Binding).
> Thanks,
> Harsha
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 9:06 PM, vito jeng wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Vito
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> >
> > > +1. (Non-bindi
Hi All,
We'd appreciate any thoughts / comments on the proposed options for
customizing SSL principal names.
We are happy to discuss any alternative approaches/suggestions.
Thanks,
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:45 AM Manikumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a KIP that prop
java.lang.String)
[2]
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/javax/security/auth/x500/X500Principal.html#getName(java.lang.String,%20java.util.Map)
Thanks
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:44 PM Eno Thereska wrote:
> Manikumar, thanks. If I understand the KIP motivation right, this is
> curren
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 2:09 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP. This is a great addition.
>
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Bill
>
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 12:06 PM Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > Thank you. This has been a source of surprises and confusion for
Hi All,
The vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Harsha, Dong Lin, Gwen) and 6
non-binding votes (Priyank, Ted, Jakub, Satish, Mickael, Adam).
Thanks everyone for the votes.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:49 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2
no
concerns, would like to start vote on this KIP.
Thanks,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 11:32 PM Priyank Shah wrote:
> Definitely a helpful change. +1 for Option 2.
>
> On 9/14/18, 10:52 AM, "Manikumar" wrote:
>
> Hi Eno,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
>
2018 at 8:05 PM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> It wasn't entirely clear to me why Option 2 was rejected.
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We would like to go with Option 1, which adds a n
Hi Manikumar,
> I am interested to know the reason for exposing this config, given
> a user has access to PrincipalBuilder interface to build their
> interpretation of an identity from the X509 certificates. Is this to
> simplify extraction of identity? and also there are other
Thanks for the reviews.
Makes sense. I don't see any downsides. Updated the KIP, to go with Option
2.
I will be starting the vote thread soon.
Thanks,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:17 PM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> Unless there is a downside to option 2 (e.g
/thread.html/e346f5e3e3dd1feb863594e40eac1ed54138613a667f319b99344710@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
Thanks,
Manikumar
Bump. This KIP requires one more binding vote.
Please take a look.
Thanks,
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 9:14 PM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Satish.
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Rajini Sivaram
> wrote:
> > Hi Manikumar,
> >
&
Congrats Colin!
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:39 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Congratulations Colin!
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 11:17 Viktor Somogyi-Vass
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Colin, well deserved! :)
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:58 AM Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > stanis...@confluent.io>
> > wrot
Hi Arseniy,
It is good have GetOffsetShell tool to work on secure clusters. Passing
additional configuration to the
underlying KafkaConsumer is sufficient for the requirement. Can you revive
this discussion thread?
Let us know if you need any help.
Thanks,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 3:27 PM Viktor
Hi all,
I have created a KIP that proposes to allow users to create delegation
tokens for other users.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-373%3A+Allow+users+to+create+delegation+tokens+for+other+users
Please take a look when you get a chance.
Thanks,
Manikumar
Hi Viktor,
We already have API (AdminClient.createPartitions,
CreatePartitionsRequest/Response ) to increase the number of partitions of
the topics.
So, we may not need the protocol changes proposed in the KIP. Let me know,
If I am missing anything.
Thanks,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:45 PM Vikt
Bump.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 8:44 PM Manikumar wrote:
> Bump. This KIP requires one more binding vote.
> Please take a look.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 9:14 PM Satish Duggana
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Satis
Hi all,
If there are no further concerns, I will start a VOTE thread for this
minor KIP.
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Manikumar
wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews.
>
> @Ted
> Updated the KIP.
>
> @Tom
> I think we can interpret usernames as locale independent str
Hi All,
I'd like to start the vote on KIP-203. Details are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-203%3A+Add+toLowerCase+support+to+sasl.kerberos.principal.to.local+rule
Thanks,
looks like VOTE thread is started for this KIP.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> +1 for making consistent default log and offsets retention time.
> I like Stephane's suggestion too, log retention override should override
> offset retention too if not explicitly configured.
looks like VOTE thread is *NOT* started for this KIP.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Manikumar
wrote:
> looks like VOTE thread is started for this KIP.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
>
>> +1 for making consistent default log and offsets rete
I'm bumping this up to get some attention :)
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Tom Bentley wrote:
> +1 (nonbinding)
>
> On 27 September 2017 at 16:10, Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-203. Details are here:
+ (non-binding)
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Dong Lin wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP. +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Paolo Patierno
> > wrote:
> &
just a minor observation: Kafka binary contains two versions of javasist
library (javassist-3.20.0-GA.jar, javassist-3.21.0-GA.jar).
This dependency is coming from connect project.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out, Jun, Ismael.
>
> Will update the s
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> +1. Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, at 10:29, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > > Thanks for the KIP. I'm assuming the new behavior
Hi,
We have a accepted KIP for adding delegation token support for Kafka.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-48+Delegation+token+support+for+Kafka
currently the PR is under review process. Maybe this can used be as
starting point for your requirement.
https://github.com/apache
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Onur Karaman <
> onurkaraman.apa...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > I'd like to start the vote for KIP-214: Add
> > zookeeper.max.in.flight.requests config to the broker
> >
> > https://cwiki.a
lie...@opencore.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> I've looked over the KIP and had a quick look at the code in the PR as
> well. In principle I think this would help Peter along depending on how
> plugable some of the components are. Since Peter wants to generate Tokens
> no
+1 (non-binding). Verified quickstart, ran producer/consumer perf scripts,
streams quickstart
ran tests on src distribution.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> +1 (binding) from me. Tested the quickstart with the source and binary
> (Scala 2.12) artifacts, ran the tests on the
Hi,
Yes, the token details and scram credentials are stored in Zookeeper and
clients connects
using tokenId and hmac for scram authentication.
We plan to implement token storage as pluggable interface.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Postmann, P. (Peter) <
peter.po
Bump up. waiting for few more binding votes.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > I'm bumping this up to get some attention :)
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Hu Xi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I didn't see any further discussion around this KIP, I'd like to start
> voting.
>
> KIP documentation:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 223+-+Add+per-topic+min+lead+and+per-partition+lead
This vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Rajini, Jason, Guozhang) and
one non-binding vote (Tom). Thanks you all for your participation.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Made a pass over the KIP. +1.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Guozhang
>
&
+1
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks, Ismael!
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Damian Guy wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 at 15:47 Ismael Juma wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The Apache Infra team has started a new project earlier this
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Dong,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
>
> Jun
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Dong Lin wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since there are no more outstanding comments, I would like to start
> voting
> > thread for KIP-237:
Done. Thanks for your interest.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 6:09 PM Suman B N wrote:
> Hi Apache Kafka Team,
>
> Could you please grant me permission to create a KIP for Apache Kafka, I
> wanted to propose a feature to ConsoleProducer in Kafka.
>
> Following are my details:
>
>- Full Name: Suman
Done. Thanks for your interest.
BTW, kafka-simple-consumer-shell was deprecated and removed in 2.0 release.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 8:01 PM Daniele Ascione wrote:
> Hello Kafka Team,
>
> I would like to have the permissions to create a KIP. I would like to
> propose a feature for the kafka-simp
LGTM.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 1:23 PM Imamba Sun wrote:
> Hi All:
>
>
> I submitted a relatively simple KIP about improving the Kafka protocol and
> the JmxTool to support to connect to a secured RMI port.
>
>
> Any advise or guidance would be greatly appreciated, I would be happy to
> receive s
Hi,
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:37 PM Fangbin Sun wrote:
> Hi, All:
> I would like to start a vote on KIP-417 which aims at supporting JmxTool
> to connect to a secured RMI port.
>
>
> The KIP:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-417%3A+Allo
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:01 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP.
> +1
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 1:56 PM Rohan Desai
> wrote:
> >
> > Calling a vote for this since it's pretty trivial/non-controversial
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp
Hi,
Thanks for the KIP.
1. Can't we include IdempotentWrite/ClusterResource Operations for Cluster
resource.
2. What will be the API behaviour when the authorizer is not configured?. I
assume we return empty list.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:33 AM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
Thanks for the KIP. looks good to me.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:24 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Love it. Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:00 PM Mateusz Zakarczemny
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have created a KIP to support additional message fields in console
> > consumer:
> > KIP-431 -
Thanks for the KIP. looks good to me.
How about adding metric for upTime also?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 1:21 PM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion about a simple change - adding a metric
> indicating the time at which the Kafka application has started.
Hi,
Thanks for the KIP. +1( binding).
Thanks,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 6:28 PM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Thanks Mickael.
>
> I thought I had to list the type only once when the same field appears
> twice (the field itself is listed both for cluster and topic). But you are
> the second person who
zed+Operations+in+Describe+Responses#KIP-430-ReturnAuthorizedOperationsinDescribeResponses-ResourceTypeAPIChanges>
with the new method details.
Please take a note of this.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:42 PM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> If there are no other concerns or suggestion
nses#KIP-430-ReturnAuthorizedOperationsinDescribeResponses-ChangesdroppedfromtheProposal>
.
Please let us know if any concerns.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:00 AM Manikumar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While implementing KIP-430, we have added supportedOp
Hi Stanislav,
I too don't have strong preference between both the metrics.
Adding `startTime` metric is reasonable to me.
Thanks,
Manikumar
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the KIP.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:52 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Thanks, Stanislav.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, at 05:23, Stanislav Kozlovski wrote:
> > Hey everybody,
> >
> >
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified the artifacts, build from src, ran tests
- Verified the quickstart, ran producer/consumer performance tests.
Thanks for running release!.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:19 AM David Arthur
wrote:
> +1
>
> Validated signatures, and ran thro
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:04 PM Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 01:59, John Roesler wrote:
>
> > +1 (nonbinding) from me.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:08 PM Guozhang Wang
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > I'd like to directly s
Hi,
Thanks you for your interest. Just added you to the contributors list.
Thanks,
Congrats Matthias!. well deserved.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:44 AM Dong Lin wrote:
> Congratulations Matthias!
>
> Very well deserved!
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 2:35 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I'm glad to announce that Matthias J. Sax is now a member of Kafka PMC.
>
Congrats Harsha!.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:43 AM Dong Lin wrote:
> Congratulations Sriharsh!
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:46 AM Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > Hi, Everyone,
> >
> > Sriharsh Chintalapan has been active in the Kafka community since he
> became
> > a Kafka committer in 2015. I am glad to
Hi Chris,
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:55 AM Konstantine Karantasis <
konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Nice and useful KIP. Thanks Chris!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Konstantine
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:14 PM Ra
HI Randall,
+1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:29 AM Randall Hauch wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 3:53 PM Konstantine Karantasis <
> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Great improvement for multi-
Hi Almog,
+1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:02 PM Almog Gavra wrote:
> I'm happy pulling it out into a separate KIP to target the discussion. This
> one can just introduce the "default" constructor for no partitions or
> r
Hi,
Thanks for your interest. I just added to you to the JIRA contributors list.
Thanks,
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 12:36 PM Sameer Katti
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Greetings.
>
> I would like to contribute to Apache Kafka. Please add me to contributors
> list.This is my JIRA handle: *samkatti*.
>
>
Hi ,
I just have permission to user id : ryan.pridgeon
Thanks,
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:11 PM Ryan P wrote:
> I would like to submit a new KIP to complete the changes made to the
> KafkaLog4jAppender. Although this does enable to ability to support SASL it
> does not extend to the use of SASL
Thanks for the KIP. LGTM.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:34 PM r...@confluent.io
wrote:
> KIP-425 adds SASL support to the KafkaLog4jAppender however it does not
> include the credential handling improvements added with KIP-86. This is a
> proposal is to expose `sasl.login.callback.handler.class` fo
Hi,
Thanks for your interest. Added you to the contributor list.
Thanks,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:35 AM Amrutha Shanbhag <
amrutha.shanb...@instaclustr.com> wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> Request you to add me to the contributor list.
> JIRA username: amrutha.shanbhag
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> *Amrutha Shanbh
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP. LGTM.
Thanks.
Manikumar
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:42 PM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP, Sandeep!
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:40 AM Satish Duggana
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (
requires a
new resourceType "User". What do you think?
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:26 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm starting a vote on this.
>
> Viktor
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:02 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
> vikt
ermissions like "UserA can create tokens
for UserB, UserC"?
Thanks,
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:39 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hey Manikumar,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
> I'm not sure I fully grasp the use-case. Would this be a quota? Do we say
> something l
Hi all,
I would like to volunteer to be the release manager for our next time-based
feature release (v2.4.0).
If that sounds good, I'll post the release plan over the next few days.
Thanks,
Manikumar
Hi,
Why do we need new ACL operation "CreateUsers"?
I think, "CreateTokens" Operation is sufficient to create "UserA can
create tokens for UserB, UserC" association.
Thanks,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 3:37 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
&g
check here:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/security/ssl/SslFactory.java#L84
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:49 AM, M. Manna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been trying to find the usage of this property within Kafka source.
> All I am trying to unde
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Vahid,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me.
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Vahid S Hashemian <
> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who participated in the discussion on
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Mickael Maison
wrote:
> +1 non-binding, thanks Vahid
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Jason Gustafson
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Vahid S Hashemian <
> > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
>
I agree it will be good if we can add "commit id/version" as an
attribute value.
It will be easy to parse. But as of now, KafkaMetric supports only
numerical values.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Rajini,
>
> About the gauges, I was thinking that the attribute would be
I agree with Jason/Apruva comments. we can wait some more time and enable
it in 1.1.0 release.
In general, we are in agreement with the change.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Apurva Mehta wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> You make some good points.
>
> First, I agree that we could have false positives w
>
> 3. The message format requirement is a good point. This should be mentioned
> in the compatibility section. Users who are still using the old message
> format will get an error after the upgrade, right?
>
so this change will break client backward compatibility while connecting
to 0.10.X broke
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks Rajini.
>
> --Vahid
>
>
>
> From: Edoardo Comar
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 08/24/2017 10:55 AM
> Subject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-152 - Improve diagnostics for
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding) from me.
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Rajini Sivaram >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
+1 (non-binding).
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Mayuresh Gharat wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mayuresh
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Jason Gustafson
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to open the vote for KIP-189:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 189%3A+
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
>
> Ismael
>
> On 31 Aug 2017 8:38 am, "Attila Kreiner" wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thx for the comments, I pretty much see a consensus here. So I'd like to
> start the vote for:
> https://cwiki.
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
> > > > rajinisiva...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Perhaps we could register dynamically for now. If we find that
> > t
Hi Rajini,
Yes, It provides the failure rate for all errors. I got confused with old
metric names.
Thank you for the clarification.
Thanks
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> We currently have topic-level metrics for FailedProduceReque
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> All the suggestions on the discuss thread have been incorporated into the
> KIP. Please let me know if you have any more concerns or else can we
> proceed with voting for this KIP?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Rajini
>
> On Thu, Aug
+1 (non-binding) , verified artifacts, quick start using binary and ran
tests on source artifact.
Thanks for running the release.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Damian,
>
> Thanks for managing the release. This may just be the first ever RC0 to be
> promoted to final.
Hi,
I think there is no specific reason. we can pass the clientId to
MetricsReporter
class's configure() method.
Can you pls raise the JIRA?
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Kevin Lu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a particular reason why the MetricsReporter class's configure()
> call is not guarante
hanks.
Manikumar
hat locale is used for the case conversion, the JVM default one or a
> specific one?
>
> On 18 Sep 2017 5:31 pm, "Manikumar" wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've created a small KIP to extend the sasl.kerberos.principal.to.local
> > rule synt
s for raising valid queries and helping me to improve the KIP
details.
I will discuss some of your notes (new consumer API, HTTP/2, multi-REST-proxy
etc) at
kafka-rest project issues page .
Thanks you all for participating in this discussion.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:
The default principal for Plaintext transport is "ANONYMOUS".
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 12:58 AM, BigData dev
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bin/kafka-acls.sh --topic kafka-testtopic --add -allow-host 9.30.15.19
> --operation Write --authorizer-properties
> zookeeper.connect=hostname.abc.com:2181
>
> Below mes
+Delegation+token+support+for+Kafka
Jun, Ashish, Gwen,
Pl review the updated KIP.
Thanks
Manikumar
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Ashish Singh wrote:
> Harsha/ Gwen,
>
> How do we proceed here? I am willing to help out with here.
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Gwen
allow users to renew a token for a specified amount of time? In
> current version of KIP, renew request does not take time as a param, not
> sure what is expiry time set to after renewal.
>
>
Yes, we need to specify renew period. I'll update the KIP.
Thanks,
Mankumar
onnect, NiFi and friends can probably use this to share clients
> between multiple jobs, tasks, etc.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Gwen
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > Ashish,
> >
> > Thank you for reviewing the KIP. Please see th
s password for authentication and tokenID for retrial of tokenHmac at
server side.
Does above sound OK?
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Harsha Chintalapani
wrote:
> @Gwen @Mani Not sure why we want to authenticate at every request. Even if
> the token exchange is chea
ve any suggestions/concerns on this KIP.
Thanks,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > @Gwen, @Rajini,
> >
> > As mentioned in the KIP, main motivation for this KIP is to reduce load
> on
> > Kerberos
> > server on large k
101 - 200 of 1736 matches
Mail list logo
