Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1150 Diskless Topics

2025-04-19 Thread Ivan Yurchenko
Hi Luke and all! I'll be participating in this discussion from the authors' side together with Josep and some other colleagues. > 2. "Write through to object storage, avoiding local disk usage" > While this title and the goal said no local disk usage, I'd like to make > sure is it really zero lo

Re: [VOTE] 3.9.1 RC0

2025-04-19 Thread TengYao Chi
Hi David Thanks for the quick fix! I will test this patch. Sincerely, TengYao David Arthur 於 2025年4月20日 週日 上午3:14寫道: > TengYao, I have a patch here that hopefully fixes the tag issue. It's > pretty hard to test without actually doing a release, so I was hoping you > could test it for me :) > >

Re: KIP-1141: Simplifying MetadataQuorumCommand by Leveraging Admin API for Controller Management

2025-04-19 Thread Kuan Po Tseng
Hi José, Apologies for the delayed response. Do you still have any questions regarding the describeConfig part? As Chia-Ping mentioned, we are able to retrieve all broker configurations through that method. (https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/da46cf6e79afbbed1da2bae831e0f70992e85f9b/core/src/

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1150 Diskless Topics

2025-04-19 Thread Ivan Yurchenko
Hi Ziming, > 1. Is this feature available by just a minor adjust of config or it will > intrude current code heavily, say, AutoMq is 100% compatible with Kafka and > doesn’t intrude the code heavily If we speak about the part visible to the user, we expect: 1. Minimal changes to the client co

Re: [VOTE] 3.9.1 RC0

2025-04-19 Thread David Arthur
TengYao, I have a patch here that hopefully fixes the tag issue. It's pretty hard to test without actually doing a release, so I was hoping you could test it for me :) https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19518 -David On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:07 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Thanks for cutting