I think we don't take implied access into account for
authorizeByResourceType. The implied access is the other way round: ALLOW
READ implies ALLOW DESCRIBE. So in your example, it doesn't make any
difference to the result of authorizeByResourceType for READ whether
implied access is taken into acco
TaiJuWu created KAFKA-17477:
---
Summary: Topic command integration test migrate to new test infra
Key: KAFKA-17477
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17477
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Te
Hi Lucas,
This sounds like an interesting approach and I wonder whether anyone
will have the context about why this part of KIP-320 was not completed.
There is one little detail that I can think of, which we can address later
as the details are confirmed. KafkaShareConsumer also uses
ConsumerRecor
Lianet Magrans created KAFKA-17480:
--
Summary: New consumer commit all consumed should retrieve offsets
in background thread
Key: KAFKA-17480
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17480
Pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Schofield resolved KAFKA-17425.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Improve coexistence of consumer groups and share groups
>
(I had to re-send this without most of the screenshots)
Now that we've had both builds running for a little while, I thought it
would be good to do a comparison.
Since we don't have much signal from PRs yet, we'll just be looking at
JDK17 trunk builds between August 15 and today.
Jenkins:
https:
Apoorv Mittal created KAFKA-17482:
-
Summary: Make share partition initialization async
Key: KAFKA-17482
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17482
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Sub-t
Georgios Kousouris created KAFKA-17484:
--
Summary: Logs are deleted in Kafka 1.1.1 if logs.segment.bytes is
changed
Key: KAFKA-17484
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17484
Project:
Matthias J. Sax created KAFKA-17485:
---
Summary: Replace KafkaClientSupplier with KafkaClientInterceptor
Key: KAFKA-17485
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17485
Project: Kafka
I still need to catch up on the discussion in general. But as promised,
I just started KIP-1088 about the `KafkaClientSupplier` question.
Looking forward to your feedback on the new KIP. I hope we can get
KIP-1088 done soon, to not block this KIP.
-Matthias
On 9/4/24 09:52, Lucas Brutschy w
Hi Rich,
Thanks for the explanation. It’s true that it breaks use of a lambda as an
implementation
of Callback and I would say that it’s not acceptable to do this. I don’t think
I’ve seen a use
of this interface which didn’t use a lambda.
I believe the main focus of this KIP was the improvement
11 matches
Mail list logo