Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1014: Managing Unstable Features in Apache Kafka

Hi Colin, I agree that we try hard to avoid breaking compatibility. I am not questioning this at all. I also agree with your concern. My point was about requiring users to opt-in for a feature vs having it enabled by default during the EA and the Preview phases. With KIP-1022, the only way to use

Re: [VOTE] 3.7.1 RC2

Hi Igor, I think we've passed the vote for the release. Are we waiting for anything to release v3.7.1? Please let me know if you need help. Thanks. Luke On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 5:17 AM Justine Olshan wrote: > Hey folks, > > Sorry for the delay. I have done the following: > > > 1. Checked sign

Re: [VOTE] 3.7.1 RC2

Hi Luke, I was just waiting for "please vote by" date in the first email. Hi all, Thank you all for having a look at this RC and voting. I'm now closing the vote. The vote passes with: - 3 +1 binding votes from Mickael, Luke and Justine - 1 +1 non-binding votes from Jakub - 0 -1 votes I'll mov

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1054: Support external schemas in JSONConverter

Hello Everyone, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-1054, which aims to Support external schemas in JSONConverter to Kafka Connect: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1054%3A+Support+external+schemas+in+JSONConverter Thank you, Priyanka

[VOTE] KIP-1054: Support external schemas in JSONConverter

Hello Everyone, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-1054, which aims to Support external schemas in JSONConverter to Kafka Connect: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1054%3A+Support+external+schemas+in+JSONConverter Discussion thread - https://lists.apache.org/thread/rwxkh1fnbx

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #3057

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.7 #185

See

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1022 Formatting and Updating Features

Hi, Colin, Yes, #3 is the scenario that I was thinking about. In either approach, there will be some information missing in the old client. It seems that we should just pick the one that's less wrong. In the more common case when a feature is finalized on the server, presenting a supported featur

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-16000) Migrate MembershipManagerImplTest away from ConsumerTestBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brenden DeLuna resolved KAFKA-16000. Resolution: Fixed [https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16312] merged > Migrate Membershi

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17052) Downgrade ShadowJavaPlugin to 8.1.3 to avoid publishing classifier bug

Greg Harris created KAFKA-17052: --- Summary: Downgrade ShadowJavaPlugin to 8.1.3 to avoid publishing classifier bug Key: KAFKA-17052 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17052 Project: Kafka

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17053) Restructure build.gradle to configure publishing last

Greg Harris created KAFKA-17053: --- Summary: Restructure build.gradle to configure publishing last Key: KAFKA-17053 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17053 Project: Kafka Issue Typ

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1059: Enable the Producer flush() method to clear the latest send() error

Thanks Alieh, it seems this KIP can just pick between a couple of tradeoffs. Adding an overloaded `send()` as the KIP propose makes sense to me and seems to provides the cleanest solution compare to there options we discussed. Given the explicit name of the passed-in option that highlights th

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1059: Enable the Producer flush() method to clear the latest send() error

Thanks for the KIP Alieh! +1 (binding) -Matthias On 6/26/24 5:29 AM, Andrew Schofield wrote: Hi Alieh, Thanks for the KIP. I think we’ve settled on a good solution. +1 (non-binding) Thanks, Andrew On 25 Jun 2024, at 13:17, Alieh Saeedi wrote: Hi all, I would like to open voting for KIP

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.8.0 release

The PR is merged. I lowered the severity of the blocker ticket as we still have the change in trunk to merge. However, the 3.8 release is no longer blocked by KAFKA-17050. I think that was the remaining blocker. The other ones are either already fixed for 3.8 (KAFKA-17011) or diverted to 3.9 (KAFKA

RE: [DISCUSS] KIP-1052: Enable warmup in producer performance test

Hi Luke and Federico, Thank you for your responses. Your questions seemed to be along similar lines so I've combined the responses. Please let me know if you need more clarification. 1. I've updated the KIP to describe both new command line options, now '--warmup-records' and '--separated-w

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1059: Enable the Producer flush() method to clear the latest send() error

Hi Alieh, This KIP has evolved a lot since I last looked at it, but the changes seem well thought-out both in semantics and API. One clarifying question I have is that it looks based on the draft PR that we've narrowed the scope from any error that might take place with producing a record to Kafka

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1059: Enable the Producer flush() method to clear the latest send() error

Ah, sorry--spoke too soon. The PR doesn't show that errors thrown from Producer::send are handled, but instead, ApiException instances that are caught inside KafkaProducer::doSend and are handled by returning an already-failed future are. I think the same question still applies (is this all we want