Re: [DISCUSS] Cluster Linking / Cross-Cluster Replication - Call for Interest & Co-Authors

Hi Greg, Thanks for starting this discussion. Yes, this is definitely a valuable feature. I'd be willing to volunteer for co-author and reviewer or anything else I can help. Hope we can make it happen! Thank you! Luke Thomas Scott 於 2023年5月20日 週六 上午6:34 寫道： > Hi Greg, > > This sounds very i

Re: [DISCUSS] Cluster Linking / Cross-Cluster Replication - Call for Interest & Co-Authors

Hi Greg I do love this feature/discussion :) I’d like to not only be a co-author/reviewer but also sponsor this feature by requesting our employees to be the contributors. Thanks! Chia-Ping > Luke Chen 於 2023年5月20日 下午6:47 寫道： > > Hi Greg, > > Thanks for starting this discussion. Yes, this

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Cluster Linking / Cross-Cluster Replication - Call for Interest & Co-Authors

Hi, I am also very excited to see this discussion, because I also implemented the "federation model" based on the kafka-0.10.2.1 version before in company and got benefits from going online. It solves the problem of seamlessly migrating the bytesIn/bytesOut of a topic to another kafka cluster wi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-927: Improve the kafka-metadata-quorum output

+1 (non binding) On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:22 AM Divij Vaidya wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Divij Vaidya > > > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:35 AM ziming deng > wrote: > > > Thanks for this improvement, +1 from me(binging) > > > > — > > Best, > > Ziming > > > > > On May 16, 2023, at 00:43, Federi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.5.0 release

Hi Matthias, Yes feel free to backport to 3.5. Thanks, Mickael On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 12:53 AM Akhilesh Chaganti wrote: > > Hi Mickael, > > I raised the blockers for AK 3.5 and raised PRs for them. All of them are > in the Zk -> KRaft migration path and critical for the Zk -> KRaft > migration

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.5.0 release

Hi Mickael, What's the plan for the first RC? In my opinion, we should really tighten the criteria for what's considered a blocker and release RC0 soon (given where we are timeline wise). Ismael On Sat, May 20, 2023, 8:15 AM Mickael Maison wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > Yes feel free to backport to

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.4 #134

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #1856

See Changes: -- [...truncated 569407 lines...] [2023-05-20T19:36:10.576Z] Gradle Test Run :streams:integrationTest > Gradle Test Executor 182 > RestoreIntegrationTest > s

Re: [VOTE] KIP-927: Improve the kafka-metadata-quorum output

I’m +1 (binding) Thanks, Federico! It looks like a nice improvement to me. -John On Sat, May 20, 2023, at 09:16, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:22 AM Divij Vaidya > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Divij Vaidya >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2023