Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-864: Add End-To-End Latency Metrics to Connectors

2022-09-03 Thread Yash Mayya
Hi Jorge and Sagar, I think it makes sense to not have a min metric for either to remain consistent with the existing put-batch and poll-batch metrics (it doesn't seem particularly useful either anyway). Also, the new "sink-record-latency" metric name looks fine to me, thanks for making the change

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-864: Add End-To-End Latency Metrics to Connectors

2022-09-03 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
On Sat, 3 Sep 2022 at 17:02, Yash Mayya wrote: > Hi Jorge and Sagar, > > I think it makes sense to not have a min metric for either to remain > consistent with the existing put-batch and poll-batch metrics (it doesn't > seem particularly useful either anyway). Also, the new > "sink-record-latency