Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-848: The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol

Three quick comments: 1. Regarding java.util.regex.Pattern vs com.google.re2j.Pattern, we should document the differences in more detail before deciding one way or another. That said, if people pass java.util.regex.Pattern, they expect their semantics to be honored. If we are doing something diffe

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-848: The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol

Thanks Hector! Our goal is to move forward with specialized API instead of relying on one generic API. For Connect, we can apply the exact same pattern and reuse/share the core implementation on the server side. For the schema registry, I think that we should consider having a tailored API to do si

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #1072

See Changes: -- [...truncated 568210 lines...] [2022-07-15T10:37:14.564Z] [2022-07-15T10:37:14.564Z] org.apache.kafka.streams.integration.TimeWindowedKStreamIntegrationTe

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.3 #8

See Changes: -- [...truncated 567796 lines...] ‘builds30’ doesn’t have label ‘builds26’ ‘builds32’ doesn’t have label ‘builds26’ ‘builds33’ doesn’t have label ‘builds26’ ‘builds

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-848: The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol

Hi David, Thanks for the KIP. I just had minor observations: 1) In the Assignment Error section in Client Side mode Assignment process, you mentioned => `In this case, the client side assignor can return an error to the group coordinator`. In this case are you referring to the Assignor returning

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-848: The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol

Thanks, Ismael. > 1. Regarding java.util.regex.Pattern vs com.google.re2j.Pattern, we should > document the differences in more detail before deciding one way or another. > That said, if people pass java.util.regex.Pattern, they expect their > semantics to be honored. If we are doing something dif

[GitHub] [kafka-site] StephanZimmermann commented on pull request #406: Add Qudosoft to powered-by

StephanZimmermann commented on PR #406: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/406#issuecomment-1185481331 Hi @bbejeck , I did the requested rebase. Ready to pull :-) Cheers -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to Git

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-848: The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol

Hi Sagar, Thanks for your comments. 1) Yes. That refers to `Assignment#error`. Sure, I can mention it. 2) The idea is to transition C from his current assignment to his target assignment when he can move to epoch 3. When that happens, the member assignment is updated and persisted with all its a

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.2.1 release

Here is the release plan for 3.2.1 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+3.2.1 I am working on getting clarity on the one open blocker. Once that is resolved (or rescheduled for a future release), I will build the first release candidate. -David On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 3

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-848: The Next Generation of the Consumer Rebalance Protocol

I'll be away from July 18th to August 8th with limited access to my emails so I will address new comments and questions when I come back. Cheers, David On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 2:16 PM David Jacot wrote: > > Hi Sagar, > > Thanks for your comments. > > 1) Yes. That refers to `Assignment#error`. Su