lmc created KAFKA-2395:
--
Summary: Linked to a interfaces even though the host.name had
config
Key: KAFKA-2395
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2395
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
A
lmc created KAFKA-2396:
--
Summary: I have config host.name and advertised.host.name but
still have a link connet to 0.0.0.0 with random port
Key: KAFKA-2396
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2396
P
Can i configure new producer api with batch, and send data in batches in
synchronous mode ?
--
SunilKalva
>Any reason you think its better to let the clients handle it?
Gwen, I agree with Todd, depending on the goal, the requirements might
vary. If the goal is that someone stills the disk, then they should be
able to access the data, then encrypting at Broker is enough. However, if
the requirement is t
Sunil,
Batching is performed for you automatically. There are a few settings you
can use to tweak it's behavior (e.g. linger.ms and batch.size), but the
defaults are good for common workloads and can achieve very high throughput.
If you want to send some messages and then wait for them to be ackn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dong Lin updated KAFKA-2388:
Assignee: Jiangjie Qin (was: Dong Lin)
> subscribe(topic)/unsubscribe(topic) should either take a callback
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14650607#comment-14650607
]
Sriharsha Chintalapani commented on KAFKA-1690:
---
[~sourabhchaki] remaining r
