+1 for Web Api
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014, at 11:48 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
> Apache Karaf has been doing this for quite a few years, albeit in Java
> not Scala. Still, their coding approach to creating a CLI probably
> captures many lessons learned over that time.
>
> Glen
>
> On 10/17/2014 08:03 PM
Maybe we should add some AdminMessage RQ/RP wire protocol structure(s) and
let the controller handle it? We could then build the CLI and Shell in the
project both as useful tools and samples for others.
Making a http interface should be simple after KAFKA-1494 is done which all
client libraries co
Hi, Guozhang,
Thanks for the writeup.
A few high level comments.
1. Associating (versioned) schemas to a topic can be a good thing overall.
Yes, this could add a bit more management overhead in Kafka. However, it
makes sure that the data format contract between a producer and a consumer
is kept
Sean Fay created KAFKA-1716:
---
Summary: hang during shutdown of ZookeeperConsumerConnector
Key: KAFKA-1716
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1716
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
A couple notes on this
1 / 2 - Message format should not be important to Kafka or the common
infrastructure (audit, mirror maker). As I have noted elsewhere, having to
ensure the data contract just to provide a general messaging service is
additional overhead that is not always needed. It eith
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14176624#comment-14176624
]
Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-1716:
--
This may be resolved in KAFKA-1305. Did you p
One concern I have is that using RQ/RP wire protocol to the controller
instead of the current way (via ZK admin path) may expose concurrency on
the admin requests, which may not be supported yet.
Some initial discussion about this is on KAFKA-1305.
Guozhang
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Joe S
Thanks for the detailed comments Jun! Some replies inlined.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Guozhang,
>
> Thanks for the writeup.
>
> A few high level comments.
>
> 1. Associating (versioned) schemas to a topic can be a good thing overall.
> Yes, this could add a bit more m
