Since we don't really have an admin api (just standalone tools), perhaps we
can start with option A. We can potentially add an admin (or tools) jar in
the future when we expose programming apis for admin.
Thanks,
Jun
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Yes, this is a good point
That's why I was thinking c) makes sense from a design perspective.
> On Feb 2, 2014, at 21:59, Jay Kreps wrote:
>
> Yes, this is a good point, the admin api could depend on zookeeper. It does
> today. That would not work in the existing clients package.
>
> -Jay
>
>
>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at
Yes, this is a good point, the admin api could depend on zookeeper. It does
today. That would not work in the existing clients package.
-Jay
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Steve Morin wrote:
> Would the admin api's potentially have different dependencies?
>
> > On Feb 1, 2014, at 15:06, Neha
Would the admin api's potentially have different dependencies?
> On Feb 1, 2014, at 15:06, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
> I like A. It will be simpler to maintain and evolve when we add the admin
> APIs.
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Steve Morin wrote:
>>
>> I like A or C
>>
>> I thi
I would vote for A just for simplicity of dependencies.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> I like A. It will be simpler to maintain and evolve when we add the admin
> APIs.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Steve Morin wrote:
>
> > I like A or C
> >
> > I think it wil
I like A. It will be simpler to maintain and evolve when we add the admin
APIs.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Steve Morin wrote:
> I like A or C
>
> I think it will be clearer for people to separate the two.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
>
> > For the new producer
I like A or C
I think it will be clearer for people to separate the two.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> For the new producer code we currently added the new module
>clients
> This builds the jar kafka-clients.jar. The core module should be renamed to
> kafka-server and
For the new producer code we currently added the new module
clients
This builds the jar kafka-clients.jar. The core module should be renamed to
kafka-server and producer kafka-server.jar.
It is the intention that the server will end up depending on the clients
but not vice versa (or we could ma
Hey All,
Another topic worth discussing is how to layout code for the new producer
and consumer as well as the common code they will share. There are really
three questions:
1. Which top-level sub-modules/directories should we have (currently
everything is under core, but presumably we want to spl
