ommit then I'm thinking we might
> > want
> > > to
> > > > make it gradually by applying it module by module?
> > > > This is one idea do you have any other?
> > > >
> > > > I know formatting sounds like the useless thing that doesn't m
t module by module?
> > > This is one idea do you have any other?
> > >
> > > I know formatting sounds like the useless thing that doesn't matter
> and I
> > > totally agree with this, that's why I don't want to care about it while
> > > co
ks
> >
> > On Thu, 10 May 2018 at 00:15 Ted Yu wrote:
> >
> >> Applying the tool across code base would result in massive changes.
> >> How would this be handled ?
> >> Original message From: Joan Goyeau
> >> Date: 5/9/18 3:31
- Original message ----From: Joan Goyeau
>> Date: 5/9/18 3:31 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Use
>> of a formatter like Scalafmt
>> Hi,
>>
>> Contributing to Kafka Streams' Scala API, I've been kinda lost on how
>> should I
au
> Date: 5/9/18 3:31 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Use
> of a formatter like Scalafmt
> Hi,
>
> Contributing to Kafka Streams' Scala API, I've been kinda lost on how
> should I format my code.
> I know formatting is the start of religion wars
Applying the tool across code base would result in massive changes.
How would this be handled ?
Original message From: Joan Goyeau Date:
5/9/18 3:31 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Use of a
formatter like Scalafmt
Hi,
Contributing to Kafka Streams'
Hi,
Contributing to Kafka Streams' Scala API, I've been kinda lost on how
should I format my code.
I know formatting is the start of religion wars but personally I have no
preference at all. I just want consistency across the codebase, no
unnecessary formatting diffs in PRs and offload the formatt
