> On July 9, 2015, 4:58 p.m., Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> > Just FYI, this was also noticed in the patch for KAFKA-2123 (which is
> > moving quite a bit of code around). The solution was a bit different (the
> > condition is different and keeps the existing generation ID increment
> > locat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36346/#review91118
---
Just FYI, this was also noticed in the patch for KAFKA-2123 (which i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36346/
---
(Updated July 9, 2015, 9:42 a.m.)
Review request for kafka.
Bugs: KAFKA-1740
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36346/
---
Review request for kafka.
Bugs: KAFKA-1740
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
