> On Feb. 26, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
> >
> > I never managed to reproduce the oom, but this looks like the right fix.
>
> Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> This happened consistently for me, which provided good motivation to
>
> On Feb. 26, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
> >
> > I never managed to reproduce the oom, but this looks like the right fix.
>
> Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> This happened consistently for me, which provided good motivation to
>
> On Feb. 26, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
> >
> > I never managed to reproduce the oom, but this looks like the right fix.
>
> Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> This happened consistently for me, which provided good motivation to
>
> On Feb. 26, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
> >
> > I never managed to reproduce the oom, but this looks like the right fix.
>
> Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> This happened consistently for me, which provided good motivation to
>
> On Feb. 26, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
> >
> > I never managed to reproduce the oom, but this looks like the right fix.
>
> Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> This happened consistently for me, which provided good motivation to
>
> On Feb. 26, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
> >
> > I never managed to reproduce the oom, but this looks like the right fix.
>
> Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> This happened consistently for me, which provided good motivation to
>
> On Feb. 26, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
> >
> > I never managed to reproduce the oom, but this looks like the right fix.
>
> Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> This happened consistently for me, which provided good motivation to
>
> On Feb. 26, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
> >
> > I never managed to reproduce the oom, but this looks like the right fix.
This happened consistently for me, which provided good motivation to figure out
how to fix it :) It looks like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31447/#review74200
---
Ship it!
Ah, now I get what "dedupe buffer" refers to :)
I never m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31447/
---
Review request for kafka.
Bugs: KAFKA-1881
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
10 matches
Mail list logo
