> On May 22, 2014, 9:14 p.m., Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > Thanks. Do we also need to do the same for PartitonMetadata, as the JIRA
> > indicates?
>
> Sriharsha Chintalapani wrote:
> Yes its included in the TopicMetadata.scala line 74.
>
Oh yes, somehow missed it :)
- Neha
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21712/#review43779
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Neha Narkhede
On May 20, 2014, 5:06 p.m., Sr
> On May 22, 2014, 9:14 p.m., Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > Thanks. Do we also need to do the same for PartitonMetadata, as the JIRA
> > indicates?
Yes its included in the TopicMetadata.scala line 74.
- Sriharsha
---
This is an automatical
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21712/#review43774
---
Thanks. Do we also need to do the same for PartitonMetadata, as the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21712/
---
Review request for kafka.
Bugs: KAFKA-1444
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
