g to create.
> My username is "GFriedrich".
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Kind regards
> Georg Friedrich
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryanne Dolan
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 3:46 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync -
t; Kind regards
> Georg Friedrich
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryanne Dolan
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 3:46 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/Improvements
>
> I am not certain, but I'd guess a KIP is not required.
e fact that those topics are always created this
> may look different.
>
> Kind regards
> Georg Friedrich
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryanne Dolan
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 4:57 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/
fferent.
>
> Kind regards
> Georg Friedrich
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryanne Dolan
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 4:57 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/Improvements
>
> Georg, sorry for the delay, but hopefully I
t for people relying on the
fact that those topics are always created this may look different.
Kind regards
Georg Friedrich
-Original Message-
From: Ryanne Dolan
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 4:57 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/Improvements
Georg, sorr
Georg, sorry for the delay, but hopefully I can still help.
1) I think the detail you're missing is that the offset syncs are very
sparse. Normally, you only get a new sync when the Connector first starts
running. You are right that it is possible for a consumer to lag behind the
most recent offse
