+1. Thanks Aditya!
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Mayuresh Gharat
wrote:
> +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mayuresh
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Joe Stein wrote:
>
> > We should probably have some release/vXYZ section so that over time we
> can
> > keep track of what KIP where approved for what rel
+1.
Thanks,
Mayuresh
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Joe Stein wrote:
> We should probably have some release/vXYZ section so that over time we can
> keep track of what KIP where approved for what release, etc/
>
> Anything not in a release folder (we could do now release/v0.8.3.0 for
> everyth
We should probably have some release/vXYZ section so that over time we can
keep track of what KIP where approved for what release, etc/
Anything not in a release folder (we could do now release/v0.8.3.0 for
everything already approved) would be where it is deemed under discussion,
or such.
~ Joe
+1
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Jiangjie Qin
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 6/1/15, 11:53 AM, "Ashish Singh" wrote:
>
> >I like the idea!
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Aditya Auradkar <
> >aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey everyone,
> >>
> >> We have enough KIP's now (25)
+1
On 6/1/15, 11:53 AM, "Ashish Singh" wrote:
>I like the idea!
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Aditya Auradkar <
>aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> We have enough KIP's now (25) that it's a bit hard to tell which ones
>>are
>> adopted or under discussion by gl
I like the idea!
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Aditya Auradkar <
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We have enough KIP's now (25) that it's a bit hard to tell which ones are
> adopted or under discussion by glancing at the wiki. Any concerns if I
> split it into 3 table
