Re: KAFKA-3112

2016-05-07 Thread Raj Tanneru
Thanks Ismael and Tao. Appreciate it. Sent from my iPhone > On May 7, 2016, at 1:14 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > Hi Raj and Tao, > > I just merged the KAFKA-3112 PR, so this issue will be fixed in 0.10.0.0. > > Thanks, > Ismael > >> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:47 PM, tao xiao wrote: >> >> KAFKA-2657

Re: KAFKA-3112

2016-05-07 Thread Ismael Juma
Hi Raj and Tao, I just merged the KAFKA-3112 PR, so this issue will be fixed in 0.10.0.0. Thanks, Ismael On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:47 PM, tao xiao wrote: > KAFKA-2657 is unresolved so you can safely assume it hasn't been fixed yet. > > On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 07:38 Raj Tanneru wrote: > > > Yeah

Re: KAFKA-3112

2016-05-06 Thread tao xiao
KAFKA-2657 is unresolved so you can safely assume it hasn't been fixed yet. On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 07:38 Raj Tanneru wrote: > Yeah it is a duplicate of KAFKA-2657. The question is how to check / know > if it is merged to 0.9.0.1 release. What are the options that I have if I > need this fix. How

Re: KAFKA-3112

2016-05-06 Thread Raj Tanneru
Yeah it is a duplicate of KAFKA-2657. The question is how to check / know if it is merged to 0.9.0.1 release. What are the options that I have if I need this fix. How can I get patch for this on 0.8.2.1? Sent from my iPhone > On May 6, 2016, at 12:06 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > It said this is a d

Re: KAFKA-3112

2016-05-06 Thread tao xiao
It said this is a duplication. This is the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2657 that KAKFA-3112 duplicates to. On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 22:13 Raj Tanneru wrote: > > Hi All, > Does anyone know if KAFKA-3112 is merged to 0.9.0.1? Is there a place to > check which version has this fix? Jir