Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2017-01-06 Thread Vahid S Hashemian
I'd like to thank everyone who took the time to review, provide feedback, and vote on this KIP. The KIP passed with 4 binding and 3 non-binding +1 votes. Binding Votes * Gwen Shapira * Jason Gustafson * Ismael Juma * Ewen Cheslack-Postava Non-Binding Votes: * Edoardo Comar * Mickael Maison * Ra

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2017-01-06 Thread Rajini Sivaram
U > > > > > > > > From: Gwen Shapira > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > Date: 05/01/2017 19:43 > > Subject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2017-01-06 Thread Mickael Maison
egistered in England and Wales with number > 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 > 3AU > > > > From: Gwen Shapira > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > Date: 05/01/2017 19:43 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Up

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2017-01-06 Thread Edoardo Comar
3AU From: Gwen Shapira To: dev@kafka.apache.org Date: 05/01/2017 19:43 Subject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update +1 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > I'd like to start another round of voting on KIP-88 after recent changes >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2017-01-05 Thread Ewen Cheslack-Postava
+1 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Thanks for the updates, +1 > > Ismael > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Vahid S Hashemian < > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com > > wrote: > > > I'd like to start another round of voting on KIP-88 after recent changes > > to the KIP ( > > https:/

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2017-01-05 Thread Ismael Juma
Thanks for the updates, +1 Ismael On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > I'd like to start another round of voting on KIP-88 after recent changes > to the KIP ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > 88%3A+OffsetFetch+Protocol+Update > > ). > > The discus

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2017-01-05 Thread Jason Gustafson
Thanks for the updates. +1 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Vahid S Hashemian > wrote: > > I'd like to start another round of voting on KIP-88 after recent changes > > to the KIP ( > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFK

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2017-01-05 Thread Gwen Shapira
+1 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > I'd like to start another round of voting on KIP-88 after recent changes > to the KIP ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-88%3A+OffsetFetch+Protocol+Update > > ). > > The discussion thread can be found here: > ht

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2016-12-12 Thread Vahid S Hashemian
: dev@kafka.apache.org Date: 12/10/2016 11:18 PM Subject:Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update +1 (binding) The AdminClient piece will probably need follow up, but given that it's defined in the context of incomplete KIP-4 design, I'm kind of assuming it'

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2016-12-10 Thread Ewen Cheslack-Postava
+1 (binding) The AdminClient piece will probably need follow up, but given that it's defined in the context of incomplete KIP-4 design, I'm kind of assuming it's still up for further discussion once we hit the implementation of that class (where I think a wholistic view of the API is needed). Vah

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2016-12-07 Thread Rajini Sivaram
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Jason Gustafson > wrote: > > > +1 Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Vahid. +1 (binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2016-12-07 Thread Apurva Mehta
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Jason Gustafson wrote: > +1 Thanks for the KIP! > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP, Vahid. +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Vahid S Hashemian < > > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2016-12-07 Thread Jason Gustafson
+1 Thanks for the KIP! On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Vahid. +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Vahid S Hashemian < > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com > > wrote: > > > Happy Monday, > > > > I'd like to start voting on KIP-88 ( > > https://cwiki.ap

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2016-12-07 Thread Ismael Juma
Thanks for the KIP, Vahid. +1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > Happy Monday, > > I'd like to start voting on KIP-88 ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > 88%3A+OffsetFetch+Protocol+Update > ). > The discussion thread can be found here: >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2016-12-07 Thread Edoardo Comar
+1 (non-binding) -- Edoardo Comar IBM MessageHub eco...@uk.ibm.com IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6

Re: [VOTE] KIP-88: OffsetFetch Protocol Update

2016-12-06 Thread Mickael Maison
Thanks for the KIP, I can see this being useful when investigating consumer issues +1 On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > Happy Monday, > > I'd like to start voting on KIP-88 ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-88%3A+OffsetFetch+Protocol+Update > ). >