Thanks for the votes, everyone! I'll go ahead and close out this vote.
The vote passes with the following results:
* 3 binding +1 from Luke C, David J, and Mickael M
* 1 non-binding vote from Ziming
* No -1 votes
Thanks!
David
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:15 AM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Hi David,
Hi David,
Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding)
Thanks,
Mickael
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:00 AM deng ziming wrote:
>
> Thanks for this KIP,
>
> +1(non-binding) from me.
>
> --
> Best,
> Ziming
>
> > On Sep 28, 2022, at 10:05 PM, David Jacot
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. I re
Thanks for this KIP,
+1(non-binding) from me.
--
Best,
Ziming
> On Sep 28, 2022, at 10:05 PM, David Jacot wrote:
>
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. I really like the approach!
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:20 AM Luke Chen wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> +1 (binding) from
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. I really like the approach!
Best,
David
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:20 AM Luke Chen wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Thank you
> Luke
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:02 PM David Arthur
> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-868
Hi David,
+1 (binding) from me.
Thank you
Luke
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:02 PM David Arthur
wrote:
> Hey folks, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-868. This proposal adds
> lightweight transactions to the KRaft controller. These transactions
> will allow us to generate atomic batches of records
