:17 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-300: Add Windowed KTable API in StreamsBuilder
Thanks for the update Boyang. +1 from me (binding).
Guozhang
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:08 AM Boyang Chen wrote:
> Thank you so much Bill!
>
> Get Outlook for iOS<htt
uary 21, 2019 10:45 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-300: Add Windowed KTable API in StreamsBuilder
>
> Thanks for the KIP Boyang.
>
> +1(binding)
> -Bill
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:31 PM Boyang Chen wrote:
>
> > Oh, good catch Guoz
Thank you so much Bill!
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: Bill Bejeck
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:45 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-300: Add Windowed KTable API in StreamsBuilder
Thanks for the KIP Boyan
February 22, 2019 1:12 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-300: Add Windowed KTable API in StreamsBuilder
>
> Hi Boyang,
>
> One quick question: for time windowed tables the API signature is "
> windowedTable" while for session windowed tables the signature is &quo
Oh, good catch Guozhang. I just renamed the function to `sessionedTable` to be
consistent, thanks!
From: Guozhang Wang
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 1:12 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-300: Add Windowed KTable API in StreamsBuilder
Hi Boyang,
One quick
Hi Boyang,
One quick question: for time windowed tables the API signature is "
windowedTable" while for session windowed tables the signature is "
sessionTable", which seems inconsistent (adj. v.s. noun). WDYT?
Guozhang
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:56 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Thanks for the K
Thanks for the KIP Boyang!
+1 (binding)
-Matthias
On 1/16/19 9:15 AM, Boyang Chen wrote:
> Hey friends,
>
> I would like to start the vote thread for KIP-300 so that we could agree on
> the high level API. Feel free to continue making comment on the discussion
> thread.
>
> Best,
> Boyang