That's fair, and nice find with the transaction performance improvement!
Once the RC is out, we'll do a final round of performance testing with the
new ProducerPerformance changes enabled.
I think it's fair that this shouldn't delay the release. Is there an
official stance on what should and shou
Hi Tom,
We are going to do another RC to include Apurva's significant performance
improvement when transactions are enabled:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/f239f1f839f8bcbd80cce2a4a8643e15d340be8e
Given that, we can also include the ProducerPerformance changes that Apurva
did to find and
That looks better than mine, nice! I think the tooling matters a lot to the
usability of the product we're shipping, being able to test out Kafka's
features on your own hardware/setup is very important to knowing if it can
work.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>
Hi Tom,
I actually made modifications to the produce performance tool to do real
transactions earlier this week as part of our benchmarking (results
published here: bit.ly/kafka-eos-perf). I just submitted that patch here:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3400/files
I think my version is more
Hi there,
I'm -1 (non-binding) on shipping this RC.
Heroku has carried on performance testing with 0.11 RC1. We have updated
our test setup to use 0.11.0.0 RC1 client libraries. Without any of the
transactional features enabled, we get slightly better performance than
0.10.2.1 with 10.2.1 client
Hi Ismael,
Thanks for running the release.
Running tests ('gradlew.bat test') on my Windows 64-bit VM results in
these checkstyle errors:
:clients:checkstyleMain
[ant:checkstyle] [ERROR]
C:\Users\User\Downloads\kafka-0.11.0.0-src\clients\src\main\java\org\apache\kafka\common\protocol\Errors.ja
Sure, 13 blockers were fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.11.0.0%20AND%20resolved%20%3E%3D%20-10d%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC
Ismael
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tom Crayford wrote:
> Is th
Is there a summary of which blockers were fixed in RC0 somewhere?
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Eno Thereska
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) passes Kafka Streams tests.
>
> Thanks,
> Eno
> > On 19 Jun 2017, at 06:49, Magnus Edenhill wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Passes librdkafka integra
+1 (non-binding) passes Kafka Streams tests.
Thanks,
Eno
> On 19 Jun 2017, at 06:49, Magnus Edenhill wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Passes librdkafka integration tests (v0.9.5 and master)
>
>
> 2017-06-19 0:32 GMT+02:00 Ismael Juma :
>
>> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
