Thanks Tom. Sounds good. :)
Ismael
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Tom Crayford wrote:
> Hi Ismal,
>
> Sure. It's a standard heroku plan, the `extended-2`, which has 8 brokers.
> We did several rounds of performance testing, some with low numbers of
> partitions and topics (16 partitions with
Hi Ismal,
Sure. It's a standard heroku plan, the `extended-2`, which has 8 brokers.
We did several rounds of performance testing, some with low numbers of
partitions and topics (16 partitions with one topic, which we typically see
the highest throughput on) and some with many more (many thousands
Hi Tom,
Would you be able to share the details of the Kafka Cluster that you used
for performance testing? We are interested in the number of brokers,
topics, partitions per broker and replication factor. Thanks!
Ismael
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Tom Crayford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Heroku h
Thanks Tom, that sounds great. And I agree about your comment regarding RC0
to RC1 changes.
Ismael
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Tom Crayford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Heroku has been testing 0.11.0.0 RC0, mostly focussed on backwards
> compatibility and performance. So far, we note a slight perfo
Hello,
Heroku has been testing 0.11.0.0 RC0, mostly focussed on backwards
compatibility and performance. So far, we note a slight performance
increase from older versions when using not-current clients
Testing a 0.9 client against 0.10.2.1 vs 0.11.0.0 rc0: 0.11.0.0 rc0 has
slightly higher through
