tic+membership+protocol+to+reduce+consumer+rebalances>
> for
> details).
> If it is used upon the older clusters like 2.3,
> *UnsupportedVersionException
> *will be thrown.
>
> Thanks!
> Haoran
>
> ----------------------------
2020 at 9:29 PM feyman2009
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Boyang
> > > You can call me Feyman :)
> > > Thanks for your quick reply with great advices!
> > > I have updated the KIP-571 , would you mind to see if it looks
> good ?
> > > Thanks !
> > >
> > >
Thanks !
> >
> > ----------------------------------
> > 发件人：Boyang Chen
> > 发送时间：2020年2月14日(星期五) 08:35
> > 收件人：dev ; feyman2009
> > 主 题：Re: [Discuss] KIP-571: Add option to force remove members in
> > StreamsResetter
at advices!
> I have updated the KIP-571 , would you mind to see if it looks good ?
> Thanks !
>
> --
> 发件人：Boyang Chen
> 发送时间：2020年2月14日(星期五) 08:35
> 收件人：dev ; feyman2009
> 主 题：Re: [Discuss] KIP-571:
Thanks for driving this change Feyman! Hope this is a good name to call you
:)
The motivation of the KIP looks good, and I have a couple of initial
thoughts:
1. I guess the reason to use setters instead of adding a new constructor to
MemberToRemove class is because we have two String members. Coul
