Starting a new thread here
https://lists.apache.org/thread/895pgb85l08g2l63k99cw5dt2qpjkxb9
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 1:05 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> Also, it looks like someone already claimed KIP-865, so I'd suggest grabbing
> a new number. :)
>
> Colin
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, at 09:38, Colin
Also, it looks like someone already claimed KIP-865, so I'd suggest grabbing a
new number. :)
Colin
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, at 09:38, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Thanks for this KIP, David!
>
> In the "motivation" section, it might help to give a concrete example
> of an operation we want to be atomic.
Hello.
Sorry, but it seems we should fix KIP numbering.
KIP-865 [1] is another KIP :).
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-865%3A+Support+--bootstrap-server+in+kafka-streams-application-reset
> 9 сент. 2022 г., в 19:38, Colin McCabe написал(а):
>
> Thanks for this KIP, D
Thanks for this KIP, David!
In the "motivation" section, it might help to give a concrete example of an
operation we want to be atomic. My favorite one is probably CreateTopics since
it's easy to see that we want to create all of a topic or none of it, and a
topic could be a potentially unbound
