Stan, I think that makes sense. I'll update the KIP and start the vote
shortly.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:54 PM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
> What do people think if we exposed:
> * eligible topics/replicas pending delete
> * ineligible topics/replicas pending delete
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 5:
What do people think if we exposed:
* eligible topics/replicas pending delete
* ineligible topics/replicas pending delete
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 5:16 PM David Arthur wrote:
> It looks like topicsIneligibleForDeletion is a subset of topicsToBeDeleted
> in the controller.
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 a
It looks like topicsIneligibleForDeletion is a subset of topicsToBeDeleted
in the controller.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:16 AM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
> ineligible replicas/topics are not included in the pending metrics, right?
> If so, sounds good to me.
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:12 PM Dav
ineligible replicas/topics are not included in the pending metrics, right?
If so, sounds good to me.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:12 PM David Arthur wrote:
> Yes I think exposing ineligible topics would be useful as well. The
> controller also tracks this ineligible state for replicas. Would that be
Yes I think exposing ineligible topics would be useful as well. The
controller also tracks this ineligible state for replicas. Would that be
useful to expose as well?
In that case, we'd be up to four new metrics:
* topics pending delete
* replicas pending delete
* ineligible topics
* ineligible re
Thanks for the KIP. This is useful. The controller also maintains a set for
topics which are awaiting deletion, but currently ineligible. A topic which
is undergoing reassignment, for example, is ineligible for deletion. Would
it make sense to have a metric for this as well?
-Jason
On Wed, Aug 7,
Updated the KIP with a count of replicas awaiting deletion.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 9:37 AM David Arthur wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, Stan. That's a good point about the partition
> count -- I'll poke around and see if I can surface this value in the
> Controller.
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at
Thanks for the feedback, Stan. That's a good point about the partition
count -- I'll poke around and see if I can surface this value in the
Controller.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 8:13 AM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP David,
>
> As you mentioned in the KIP - "when a large number of
Thanks for the KIP David,
As you mentioned in the KIP - "when a large number of topics (partitions,
really) are deleted at once, it can take significant time for the
Controller to process everything.
In that sense, does it make sense to have the metric expose the number of
partitions that are pend
Thanks for the KIP. Its useful metric to have. LGTM.
-Harsha
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:24 AM, David Arthur
wrote:
> Hello all, I'd like to start a discussion for
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/
> KIP-503%3A+Add+metric+for+number+of+topics+marked+for+deletion
>
> Thanks!
10 matches
Mail list logo
