Thanks for following up on this Ismael!
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I went ahead and moved the mentioned KIPs as well
> as KIP-59, KIP-64, KIP-69 and KIP-76 to a dormant/inactive table. Note that
> this is not a permanent change, people are welco
Thanks for the feedback. I went ahead and moved the mentioned KIPs as well
as KIP-59, KIP-64, KIP-69 and KIP-76 to a dormant/inactive table. Note that
this is not a permanent change, people are welcome to move a KIP back to
the "Under discussion" table if it's not inactive/dormant.
Ismael
On Tue,
+1 as well.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> +1. This is a good idea as we have a lot of KIPs in flight.
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:53 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A while back Grant proposed moving inactive/dormant KIPs to a separate
> > table in the wi
+1. This is a good idea as we have a lot of KIPs in flight.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:53 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A while back Grant proposed moving inactive/dormant KIPs to a separate
> table in the wiki. I think this is a good idea as it will make it easier
> for people to see the K
